View Story | 145 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
No connection? That's a bit far fetched. Maybe they do not care about Iraqi prisoner torture, but what a stage it gave them. The torture stands on its own as a crime against humanity perhaps worse than the rush to war. It sure did as much to destroy the standing of the US as the war, if not more. And it was every bit as effective as a recruiting tool for AQ. Indeed, the torture by US troops was powerful enough to render the entire US military impotent and the US unable to "win" the war in Iraq. Why walk away from that?
by schemp on Tue May 11, 2004 at 09:28:58 PM PDT
by dacarlton on Tue May 11, 2004 at 09:36:24 PM PDT
[ Parent ]
by Jeff Simpson on Tue May 11, 2004 at 09:41:25 PM PDT
by dacarlton on Tue May 11, 2004 at 09:47:29 PM PDT
I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat. Will Rogers.
by tomathawl on Wed May 12, 2004 at 08:28:17 AM PDT
Another angle: Do we even know how many Americans, not to mention Westerners, are held hostage now? Remember the way the Iranians taking the US Tehran embassy staff hostage had completely paralized the Carter administration? BushCo wasn't going to repeat that mistake. They just ignore or downplay any hostages in Iraq. So decapitation is one of the few ways that Iraqis have available to point out that they are holding Americans captive.
Dose BushCo even bother to determine what Americans are being held hostage by Iraqis? Not that I am aware of. It's bad P.R.
by Alexander on Tue May 11, 2004 at 11:24:27 PM PDT
this was like lighter fluid added and it burst into flames
What gets me is all these scandals and BS and we are still polarized, 50-50 with BUSH? Thomas Frank had a good article in Harpers recently about the rethugs base and how they get their base to vote for them even when it is against their own interest. Im off on an open thread tangent........
"If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking 'til you suck seed."--Curly Howard
by JackAshe on Wed May 12, 2004 at 06:01:24 AM PDT
by haglera on Wed May 12, 2004 at 07:30:07 AM PDT
I raise it as an open question about the similarities and differences between Berg's murder and Quattrocchi's, which was also videotaped and was not run by Al-Jazeera because it was too horrific.
For example, it might be worth noting that the Quattrochi killing was assertedly prompted by PM Berlusconi's remarks refusing to withdraw troops from Iraq. As confirmed by the demands with respect to Berg, it seems that the hostage-takers are paying attention to news cycles in the West and then tailoring the demands and timing the murders to generate attention more than anything else. And generating attention I think serves two purposes. One is as a recruiting tool (as posters below have mentioned). The other is perhaps to prompt a violent and irresponsible reaction by the US. Which of course, become a terrorist recruiting tool ...
Another question: the Guardian article noted that the "Green Brigade" took the Italians hostage, but said no one had heard from that group before. I wonder if anyone knows more about that group and, if it's connected to Zarqawi. Maybe the Italian killing by an unkwown "brigade" was a test run for a more publicized, gruesome, and emotionally twisted murder of an American.
"Supposing truth is a woman -- what then?" -- Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil
by phaedrus on Wed May 12, 2004 at 11:44:02 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 145 comments