Daily Kos

View Story | 142 comments

  •  On Cass Sunstein (4.00 / 2)

    I saw Sunstein lose it at CLS.  He gave a lecture supporting Catherine McKinnon's anti-pornography ordinance.  Sunstein argued that pornography was low value speech -- being just a "masturbatory aide" -- and thus could constitutionally be subject to banning.  After the lecture (held in the fifth floor handle of the "toaster,"  professor Andrzej Rapaczynski made the point that many works considered pornographic -- like those by the Marquis de Sade -- were also very political and therefore "high value" speech.  In response, Sunstein lost it, and started yelling at Rapaczynski accusing him of just wanting to be able to look at dirty pictures.

    This was on the heels of a then very recent, very popular visiting professorship at Columbia, in which we who took Sunstein's Administrative Law class idolized him.  He taught Ad Law like what it is -- high octane constitutional law.

    The point is simply that Sunstein in person can get overwrought and flaky when he's been working too hard and hasn't been getting enough sleep.  He does have feet of clay.

    This aggression will not stand, man.

    by kaleidescope on Tue Dec 27, 2005 at 08:40:31 AM PDT

    •  As one known to "lose it" (4.00 / 4)

      on occasion, I sympathize with Sunstein on that character flaw we share.

      But, I hope he is willing to, as I try to be, own up to errors and correct his mistakes. He has made a grievous one here.

      Everybody dies alone.

      by Armando on Tue Dec 27, 2005 at 08:43:28 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Wow! How can anybody... (none / 0)

        How can anybody possibly "rate" speech?  I don't care much for sports, so I'd rate football pretty low.

        Obviously, most of my buddies would disagree with that assessment.  

        That doesn't make me a genius and them fools, but I'm not going to change my viewpoint anytime soon, nor do I expect them to change theirs.  

        Not only would I rate some erotic/pornographic writing pretty highly, it's also unclear how one distinguishes between the two.  Autobiography of a Flea is a "classic" (read: old and much-reprinted) and I don't find it very sexy at all.  Many others find it tremendously exciting.  

        I find the whole basis for his distinctions on writing to be extremely subjective and thus worthless.  

View Story | 142 comments