View Story | 147 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." Sinclair Lewis
by cpa1 on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 08:59:04 AM PDT
by BrianVA on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:02:54 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
Now I'm not one for torture, but this rendition is extraordinary.
by kbse matt on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:05:01 AM PDT
Join Me at Netroots Nation: The Next President and the Law
by Adam B on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:06:38 AM PDT
I don't appreciate accusations of racism, even borderline warnings, when there is no direct evidence. I think racism is a very important issue that gets diluted when people overreact to statements like the original comment.
by kbse matt on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:13:46 AM PDT
by BrianVA on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:24:17 AM PDT
I just feel that it's important to explain when making a comment like yours. I don't want us to self-censor ourselves out of fear of being called racists. Your later reply explains the issue much better than your first one and I thank you for sharing it.
by kbse matt on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:27:39 AM PDT
by Adam B on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:28:59 AM PDT
by kbse matt on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:30:05 AM PDT
Are they both, he and Obama out of their f___ minds? What reasons could they have had for supporting this lying incompetent Bush ass kisser? Maybe what THEY did was racist. I'm Jewish and hate can't stand Lieberman or Feinstein. The site of them makes me nauseous. I have no respect anymore for Obama, Ford or Salazar. They are not the kinds of Democrats I want. So, they are either stupid or they are racist for voting to confirm because she is African American and neither is what the Senate Democrats need. They are in bad enough shape without that kind of stupidity and arrogance. If Mfume will follow in their footsteps, his announcement does nothing for me. The only reason I brought it up was because of his answers on ABC's "This Week."
We have to be a lot more discriminating in our selections and make Democrats pay dearly who go against what we are trying to do, regardless of their color or their religion. I am very disappointed in my Jewish friends and family who were so quick to become Republicans because they thought Bush was good for Israel and the economy. We have to call it like it is. I am not upset with Obama and Ford because they are African American, I am upset with how quickly they sold out.
by cpa1 on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:34:45 AM PDT
by BrianVA on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:38:32 AM PDT
As far as the rest of the Democrats, I think they were spineless assholes for voting to confirm. Being Jewish, if I can be pissed off at Lieberman and Feinstein for closing their eyes and sticking with the Republicans too often because of Israel, why can't I be pissed off at Obama. Like I said, I assumed he was less tainted being new.
Why do you think he voted to confirm Rice?
Also, why would Harold Ford be so pissed off at the Senators who gave Rice a hard time? Isn't he smart enough to realize why she never should have been confirmed?
by cpa1 on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:48:30 AM PDT
by BrianVA on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 10:00:29 AM PDT
Then Rice, flat out lied to the American public to cover up her inadequacies. Then she lied about Iraq and then she lied to the 9/11 Commission. What kind of Senator would allow a piece of trash like this to represent our country all over the world? And so far look at what she has done. She's being Bush's whore again by trying to deceive everyone about confirming a would be UN Ambassador John Bolton, a man who wants to remove the top ten floors and have the US as the only permanent member of the Security Council. We're back to Old Europe again.
So like what are the Democrats supposed to be doing? Wouldn't that nomination have been a good time to put the Bush Administration in a boiling cauldron? So, what they did instead, is pull a John Kerry, the wimped out (I know Kerry voted not to confirm but he knows how pissed we are at him...he's useless!!!!). By confirming Rice, they are confirming, in the minds of the American people, that she and Bush did a great job or why else would they confirm her.
Obama didn't have the baggage of being a 6 term Senator and he could have made his statement. If he really thought that a president could even appoint the most incompetent boob, who happens to be a serial liar, then I have no use for him as I have no use for anyone who voted for Rice's confirmation. When are we going to get angry, selective and punish those Democrats who live in their own dream world? We have that right you know. As I have said before, for this confirmation of Rice to be Obama's introduction to the Senate, all the hopes for him, at least mine, are gone.
by cpa1 on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 11:04:21 AM PDT
by BrianVA on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 11:23:52 AM PDT
I am sick and tired of one set of rules with no boundariess for the Republicans and different rules that have to follow strict interpretation for the Democrats. As far as I am concerned, Condoleezza Rice committed a lot more high crimes and misdemeanors against the US than Clinton did.
There is an Advise and Consent function that the Senate must perform. I think Rice was unfit for the job. Just because her boss is unfit for any job other than dog catcher, that should not obsolve the entire executive branch. Rejecting that lying incompetent would be without malice as it could have easliy been proven she was unfit.
Given what the Republicans CS did to Clinton, Obama and the rest of those jerks, a law professor and many lawyers, couldn't figure this out? I wonder how many votes she would have gotten if she were white and lied the same way she lied, and wouldn't answer questions of the 9/11 committee after appearing on all the Sunday news talk shows and missed just about everything that had to do with national security, as she so clearly missed? I bet Obama and a lot of those assholes in the Senate would have rejected her. This has noting to do with my bias because I have absolutely no bias. It has to do with the stupidity of the Democratic Senators and maybe in Obama's case, because he wasn't there for Clinton and this was his first vote, maybe it had to do with color. Either way, I've lost a lot of repsect for Obama, the same kind of loss of respect that happened with Liberman, Biden, Feinstein, Clinton, Schumer....need I go on?
by cpa1 on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 02:32:08 PM PDT
by cpa1 on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:38:49 AM PDT
Because he believes in largely deferring to the President in filling his cabinet, as did 32 other Democrats?
by Adam B on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 09:41:46 AM PDT
The consequences of deferring to them on anything are not the same consequences of deferring to a sane political leadership.
We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"
by Gooserock on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 11:31:01 AM PDT
by Adam B on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 11:33:13 AM PDT
by jiacinto on Mon Mar 14, 2005 at 05:54:08 PM PDT
by cpa1 on Tue Mar 15, 2005 at 06:58:14 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 147 comments