Skip to main content

View Diary: Noam Chomsky on U.S. policy towards Iran (223 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  see this exchange (6+ / 0-)

    Ron Paul: We are escalating our sharp rhetoric toward Iran, we're deploying additonal carrier group and Patriot missiles to the region. And, although Iran has approached the United States to establish serious dialog two times since 9/11, they have been rebuffed both times...
    Condoleezza Rice: ...When we have a carrier strike group into the gulf, or provide PAC-3, which is a defensive system, it's simply to demonstrate that the United States remains determined to defend its interests in the gulf, and the interests of its allies. And that, congressman, is a position that has been held by American presidents going back for nearly 60 years. I would just note that these are discrete respones to Iranian activities that are really deeply concerning, not just for us, but for the rest of the world as well. Now as to Tehran, and whether we can talk to them. I offered in May to reverse 27 years of American policy, and to meet my counterpart any place, any time, to talk about any set of issues that Iran wishes to talk about, if they would just do one thing. And that is, adhere to the demand that the international community is making, that they stop enrichment and reprocessing, so that we that while we're talking, they're not improving their capability to get a nuclear weapon. So I think, congressman, the question isn't why won't we talk to Tehran, the question is why won't they talk to us.

    •  I Iove the whole "international community" meme. (0+ / 0-)

      At least Russia & China are sane.

      And this one is a great way to approach the bargaining table: "we'll generously talk to you without any preconditions whatsoever, as long as you agree up front to do what we want".

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site