Skip to main content

View Diary: Just Words (275 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  yes (0+ / 0-)

    the same way she "lost" Nevada.  the same sort of undemocratic process that's so hateful when it could be used to give Clinton the nomination is perfectly permissable when ends up awarding Obama more delegates.

    And yes, I'm comparing the disproportionate awarding of delegates in the nevada caucus and the caucus system in general to superdelegates.

    •  Yes, Obama won Texas. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      DrJeremy

      It's just the rules. Texas chooses to have a primary and a caucus. Whoever wins the most in both of those combined, they win the state.

      And whoever wins the most delegates wins the primary.

      Just rules.

      Do you live in MI or FL by any chance? They seem to  have a problem understanding rules in those states.

      Bitch isn't the new black. It's the new racist. They didn't leave bitches to die in NO. And Hillary, if experience is so critical, explain Cheney.

      by jonathan strange on Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 09:34:08 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  yeah, (0+ / 0-)

        slander the whole state of Florida because the republicans fought to push up the primary.. or didn't you notice that republicans carry a supermajority in both houses and have the governor's mansion...

        as for Michigan.. well, I dunno what happened there.

        but that's my point.  under that logic, it's perfectly fine for Clinton to try to pull supers to her side and win.

        well within the rules.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site