Skip to main content

View Diary: Just Words (275 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Obama has won more primaries. (0+ / 0-)

    Do you have a point?

    Oh, right, because New York, California, Mass. and NJ won't go Dem unless Hillary is the candidate.  Uh huh.  

    •  I really don't have a point (0+ / 0-)

      good call - except that no one really cares to be logically consistent.

      Oh, and yeah, that's a completely bullshit line of argument - not one of the smarter things to come out of the Clinton campaign (really, I'm not sure anything smart has come out of her campaign since late fall).  I like Obama's map out of the latest SUSA polling better than Clinton's, and have said as much.  You're conflating two completely unrelated arguments.

      •  Since when did, "conflating," become (0+ / 0-)

        the new DKos word?

        It is so over-used.

        Now then, speaking of same, what did you mean by, "too bad we don't have a national caucus, then."

        •  lol it's late and I need a coffee (0+ / 0-)

          I was comparing the results of the Texas caucus to the Texas primary.

          I get the value of caucusing - I just don't necessarily see the payoff.

          Anyway, we were discussing the diary, which quotes an article (which we have established is correct) that Clinton won the Texas primary.  And because I was made a comment about the Texas nominating system, you come back with a Clinton campaign point (inflammatory and insulting - not to mention I've never claimed any states don't matter).  Nothing to do with  the diary, the article, or the sub-point we were going back and forth about.

          I guess I could've called you out on just being a dick rude, but I said conflated instead and suggested that I don't buy that campaign point to begin with.

          Clearer?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site