Skip to main content

View Diary: Just Words (275 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I really don't have a point (0+ / 0-)

    good call - except that no one really cares to be logically consistent.

    Oh, and yeah, that's a completely bullshit line of argument - not one of the smarter things to come out of the Clinton campaign (really, I'm not sure anything smart has come out of her campaign since late fall).  I like Obama's map out of the latest SUSA polling better than Clinton's, and have said as much.  You're conflating two completely unrelated arguments.

    •  Since when did, "conflating," become (0+ / 0-)

      the new DKos word?

      It is so over-used.

      Now then, speaking of same, what did you mean by, "too bad we don't have a national caucus, then."

      •  lol it's late and I need a coffee (0+ / 0-)

        I was comparing the results of the Texas caucus to the Texas primary.

        I get the value of caucusing - I just don't necessarily see the payoff.

        Anyway, we were discussing the diary, which quotes an article (which we have established is correct) that Clinton won the Texas primary.  And because I was made a comment about the Texas nominating system, you come back with a Clinton campaign point (inflammatory and insulting - not to mention I've never claimed any states don't matter).  Nothing to do with  the diary, the article, or the sub-point we were going back and forth about.

        I guess I could've called you out on just being a dick rude, but I said conflated instead and suggested that I don't buy that campaign point to begin with.

        Clearer?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site