Skip to main content

View Diary: MN-Sen Events v. 39.1, Desperate Norm Thread (190 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Peemptive Injuction? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Texas Blue Dot, WineRev

    Wonder what the likelihood is of Camp Coleman finding a court that would issue an injunction that would prevent Ritchie from certifying a winner until the duplicate ballot issue is resolved?

    •  Kind of unlikely I think (7+ / 0-)

      Team Norm heard the MN Atty. Gen. Swanson issue an opinion the Canvassing Board did not have jurisdiction on the dup. ballot issue.

      Team Norm took that to the MN Supreme Ct. and were TOLD 5-0 (and thats telling!) that the only court with jurisdiction is an "election contest" court of 3 judges appointed AFTER a winner in a race is certified. (All spelled out in MN law.)

      So I don't think Team Norm can go anywhere in MN to get a judge to rule against black-letter law and a still glowing 5-0 Supreme Ct. decision.

      If they want to file suit its AFTER a winner is ceritfied.

      Shalom.

      "God has given wine to gladden the hearts of people." Psalm 104:15

      by WineRev on Wed Dec 31, 2008 at 10:05:50 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  That was already decided by the Supreme Court (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Norm DePlume

      No lower court will issue an injunction that the Supreme Court turned down unanimously.

      Coming Soon -- to an Internet connection near you: Armisticeproject.org

      by FischFry on Wed Dec 31, 2008 at 02:19:33 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site