Skip to main content

View Diary: MO-Sen: Dems suffering from intensity gap (246 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Riiight. (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Aexia, askew, savvyspy, greatdarkspot

    Because if 70% of Missouri didn't like the mandate they'd LOVE single payer.  

    Missouri is a pretty conservative state and Canrnahan will be attacked for Obama's liberal policies not because he hasn't done enough.

    Sen. Reid is no different than the Republicans who demagogue the issue. He's no different than Sarah Palin, Steve King, Rush Limbaugh. Enjoy the company.

    by Jonze on Tue Aug 17, 2010 at 08:52:25 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  As you must know, (12+ / 0-)
      The Republcians turned out heavily for the primary and ended up voting on health care.

      Please don't use Republican talking points to paint Missouri as more conservative than it is.

      Obama pulls down Carnahan and his new voters may not turn out.

      That does not mean it is over.  Blunt has been running agaisnt Obama.  Carnahan's ads hit hard at Blunt.  No one is engaged now, so the polls are not destiny.

      Misouri has progressives and moderates in the Democratic Party.  

      I think the entire health care battles harmed Dems tremdously because it went on and on.  

      Carnahan can win.  It does not mean she will.

      But Blunt is beatable.

      The economy ius strangling Dems evewrywhere.  Thank Summers and Geithner for that one.

      Pooties and Woozles unite; you have nothing to lose but your leashes!

      by TomP on Tue Aug 17, 2010 at 08:59:37 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I think Carnahan can win as well... (7+ / 0-)

        But not as some progressive lion, which means the idea that Obama's lack of progressive policies is what's hurting her is bunk.  How progressive is Claire McCaskill?  How much did she win her race by?

        Sen. Reid is no different than the Republicans who demagogue the issue. He's no different than Sarah Palin, Steve King, Rush Limbaugh. Enjoy the company.

        by Jonze on Tue Aug 17, 2010 at 09:02:37 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Obama hurts Carnahan. (8+ / 0-)

          That seems obvious.  I think it is mostly the economy.  The lack of sucess there hurts her.  "Progressive polcies" include economc policies.  But, yes, the list in that comment does not resonate that much with regular voters.  As you know, Missouri is a purple state.  Economic populists can do well here.  Moderate liberals can succeed.  Progressives have trouble winning statewide.

          Carnahn is more prgressive than Claire and I think she will run an economic populist campaign.  

          Pooties and Woozles unite; you have nothing to lose but your leashes!

          by TomP on Tue Aug 17, 2010 at 09:07:43 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  I'll bet on a Carnahan win. (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        askew, AgentOfProgress
        Carnahan is just getting started.  Blunt has been running hard against her, but he has mostly been campaigning against Obama, Pelosi and Reid since March.  

        The Carnahan brand carries a lot more weight than does the Blunt crime family's.  I expect that things will even up soon but that the race is going to stay neck and neck until November.  

        It's a shame that Feds dropped their investigation of DeLay.

        "[Tea Party]Patriot: The person who can holler the loudest without knowing what he is hollering about." Mark Twain

        by duckhunter on Tue Aug 17, 2010 at 09:35:19 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  New Voters. (6+ / 0-)
      AA tunrout may be big in St. Louis County because Charlie Dooley, the AA County Executive, will be in a close battle.  St. Louis County has a million people and about 20% are AAs.  If they turn out for Charlie, it will help Robin.

      Pooties and Woozles unite; you have nothing to lose but your leashes!

      by TomP on Tue Aug 17, 2010 at 09:01:23 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  How does hating a mandate to buy junk insurance.. (4+ / 0-)

      from corrupt private insurers translate to a dislike of Medicare for All?

      The only similarity between the two is that Republicans oppose both, but then Republicans oppose everything.

      In fact, liberals (like me) oppose the mandate too, but we don't oppose Medicare for All.

    •  GOP doesn't know what "liberal" means. (0+ / 0-)
        Today's Republican Party would like our leader to be a king, you know, a commander-in-chief who has all the power and who doesn't have to worry about getting elected.  It's a good thing our founding fathers were liberals.  
    •  I'm already seeing ads in MO attacking her (0+ / 0-)
      for being a "rubber stamp for the Obama/Reid/Pelosi liberal agenda"

      Amazing. She has absolutely no voting record in the senate and the assholes on the right are already assuming she'll rubber stamp the "liberal agenda"

      Proud Socialist Fuckstick

      by yg17 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 at 09:51:36 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site