You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Any gang led by these two is only going to do harm.
Deniers of reality in the Senate, led of course by Republicans and bolstered by a few soft-spined Democrats, are trying to find away to avoid allowing the Senate to become a marginally more functional body.
Influential senators, fearful of Majority Leader Harry Reid’s threat to jam filibuster changes through the Senate early next year, have begun back-channel talks to avoid what critics dub the “nuclear option.” [...]
So top Senate Republicans — including John McCain of Arizona, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Jon Kyl of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina — are trying to head off the showdown. They’re reaching out to Democrats who have expressed concerns about changing the rules by 51 votes, including Sens. Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Carl Levin of Michigan. And Republicans are reaching out to a key Reid ally, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, the No. 3 Senate Democrat and chairman of the Rules Committee, to see whether a deal can be cut before the new Congress convenes in January.
Gee. Where have we heard that before? Maybe in 2005 when it was the Democrats, including Pryor, teaming up with—you guessed it—Lindsey Graham and John McCain and others to constitute the "Gang of 14" to prevent Democrats from filibustering George W. Bush's most heinous judicial picks. Or maybe you remember the January 2011 "Gentleman's Agreement," the set of empty promises from Republicans on reducing obstruction the last time Harry Reid threatened real filibuster reform. We all know how that worked out for judicial nominees and just about every other piece of critical legislation taken up since Democrats took the Senate back in 2007.
These senators say they are "alarmed that the move could fundamentally change the Senate: Future majorities could cite such a precedent to change whatever rules they want in an institution designed to protect the rights of the minority." Never mind that the minority has already fundamentally changed the Senate by abusing current rules and nearly grinding the body's actions to a halt. And never mind that the proposal Reid has floated retains minority protections and that the filibuster can still be used on final passage of bills—it just means that Republicans couldn't prevent simple debate from happening on a bill with a filibuster, and would actually have to do some real work to continue to make the Senate as dysfunctional as it is today.
And never mind that the Republicans, who have happily broken every other agreement made so far, are going to have absolutely no compunction about fucking over Democrats should they regain the majority in the near future. Let's look at the reality of what the Senate is now. The absolutely unprecedented obstruction by Republicans has prevented real deliberation, has made compromise essentially impossible, and has put the federal judiciary in a very real crisis.
The Senate has already been fundamentally changed. Reid's simple reforms might actually bring back the Senate these people say they revere.