This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

You can be detained indefinitely without reason or trial if the Feds want it so. All your emails are being analyzed by the NSA. They probably even know when you've been naughty (they may still be working on nice). But in one small blow for the Bill of Rights Federal District Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled today that New York City Police must stop their indiscriminate Stop & Frisk tactics as they relate to private apartment buildings participating in New York City's Clean Halls Program.

A judge is putting the brakes on stop-and-frisk.

A federal judge today ordered the NYPD to "immediately cease" stopping people outside Bronx apartments enrolled in a voluntary anti-crime program unless cops have "reasonable suspicion of trespass...

...cops will be expected to justify every stop-and-frisk encounter.

She ordered the NYPD to revise its written policies and training for stop-and-frisk encounters inside and outside of buildings in the "Clean Halls" program. She also ordered the police to document each encounter and have supervisors periodically review them to make sure there was a reason for the stop.

The New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) hailed this as a major victory, although the ruling is only a preliminary injunction. A full trial on the issue will come later.
"Today's decision is a major step toward dismantling the NYPD's stop-and-frisk regime," said NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman. "Operation Clean Halls has placed New Yorkers, mostly black and Latino, under siege in their own homes in thousands of apartment buildings. This aggressive assault on people's constitutional rights must be stopped."

The preliminary injunction decision comes in the case of Ligon v. City of New York, which was filed on behalf of residents of buildings enrolled in Operation Clean Halls and individuals who were unlawfully stopped and arrested on trespassing charges through the program....

"With today's ruling, the federal court has stated loudly and clearly that a major part of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk program is unconstitutional and that the time has come for the courts to order a halt to illegal stops," said NYCLU Associate Legal Director Christopher Dunn. "If New York City has any sense, it will use this ruling as an opportunity to start a wholesale reform of stop and frisk."

New York City has consistently demonstrated that it has no sense, so the erstwhile wishes of the NYCLU are unlikely to come true any time soon. Only a multi-pronged approach of lawsuits, public pressure and resistance is likely to achieve the simple goal of upholding the 4th amendment. And that only until the NSA starts recording your brain waves.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

10:59 AM PT: From the NY Times:

The fact that a person was merely seen entering or leaving a building was not enough to permit the police to stop someone, “even if the building is located in a high-crime area, and regardless of the time of day,” the judge ruled. Nor was it enough for an officer to conduct a stop simply because the officer had observed the person move furtively, Judge Scheindlin said. (The forms that the police fill out after each street stop offer “furtive” movements as a basis for the stop).
New York Times

11:09 AM PT: More from NY Times, Judge's ruling

"...the public interest in liberty and dignity under the Fourth Amendment trumps whatever modicum of added safety might theoretically be gained from the N.Y.P.D.'s making unconstitutional trespass stops..."
Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to jpmassar on Tue Jan 08, 2013 at 10:49 AM PST.

Also republished by Occupy Wall Street, Progressive Policy Zone, and Police Accountability Group.

Your Email has been sent.