This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

U.S. representative (R-WI) Paul Ryan attends a vigil in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, August 7, 2012. The killings of six worshippers at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin has thrust attention on white power music, a thrashing, punk-metal genre that sees the white race u
Earlier Tuesday, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) delivered the definitive Republican smackdown on President Barack Obama's second inaugural address:
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) on Tuesday accused
President Obama of attacking “straw men” in his second inauguration speech,
arguing that the president mischaracterized Republicans’ position on
federal entitlement programs.

“No one is suggesting that what we call our earned entitlements – entitlements you pay for, like payroll taxes for Medicare and Social Security – are putting you in a ‘taker’ category,” Ryan said on conservative commentator Laura Ingraham’s radio show. “No one would suggest that whatsoever.”

Ryan, the GOP’s 2012 vice-presidential nominee and his party’s leader when it comes to pressing for federal entitlement reform, contended that Obama made a “switcheroo” in his speech by suggesting that Republicans have referred to beneficiaries of those programs as “takers.” In reality, he said, that term refers to recipients of welfare and other non-“earned” entitlements.

Ooomph. Talk about a punishing barrage of brutal rhetorical blows. Seriously, that was epic. In fact, it's a good thing that President Obama already won his reelection campaign (beating none other than Paul Ryan in the process), because otherwise, I don't know if the president could ever hope to recover from Ryan's devastating critique.

And let me be clear, I'm perfectly serious. As Ryan said, the president attacked a strawman. For example, when Ryan proposed ending Medicare as we know it, he wasn't doing so because he is against Medicare—it's just that he doesn't think it should exist, at least not as it currently stands. So it's a total strawman to say Paul Ryan isn't the most committed Medicare supporter in the world. After all, his mother is a Medicare recipient.

Same goes for Social Security. Paul Ryan is the the biggest champion of Social Security ever to walk on the face of this earth. FDR pales in comparison. Nobody should ever forget Ryan's stirring, emotional defense of the program when he spoke to the Ayn Rand Leadership Society of America (or whatever the name of the group was):

But when you look at the fight that we’re in here in Capital Hill, it’s a tough fight. It’s a very important fight. But we need more people on our side to fight this fight. That is why there is no more fight that is more obvious between the differences of these two conflicts than Social Security.  Social Security right now is a collectivist system, it’s a welfare transfer system.
See? President Obama was totally setting up a straw man when he suggested Republicans believe programs like Social Security "make us a nation of takers." That's nothing at all like what Republicans believe, certainly not Paul Ryan. Instead, he believes Social Security is a collectivist system. It's a wealth transfer system. That's totally different than "a nation of takers." Totes!

Continue below the fold to find out which one of Paul Ryan's former bosses helped make his case in a secret video recorded during the 2012 presidential campaign ...


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

And keep in mind that Paul Ryan isn't the only Republican who has repeatedly gone on record with statements disproving President Obama's claim. Take, for example, Paul Ryan's former boss and 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney. Here's what he said on secret video during the campaign:

There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax.
Clearly, there's simply no evidence for President Obama to accuse Republicans of saying things like Social Security and Medicare turn us into a nation of takers. And there's really nobody better to make that case than Paul Ryan. Because neither he nor anybody that he's closely associated with has ever said anything that could possibly have been construed as anything less than a full-throated defense of the social safety net, from Medicare and Social Security on down.
Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to The Jed Report on Tue Jan 22, 2013 at 12:44 PM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.


Your Email has been sent.