This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Wayne LaPierre being rudely interrupted by reality
"Keep guns out of the hands of criminals" eh?
The Hill reported yesterday on this, and since I haven't spotted it here yet, seems worth mentioning. The Senate's package of stronger gun laws includes straw purchasing of guns -- specifically, making it a federal crime, a tougher new law to crack down on one of the methods criminals use to acquire guns.

And so naturally the NRA is demanding that this legislation be changed, making it harder on law enforcement and easier on the straw purchasers. Because you know, they're all about keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, except when the NRA chooses to defend the criminals.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

So, this is what's happening to the first legislative measure that passed muster in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Increased penalties on straw purchases of guns sailed through the Senate Judiciary Committee and looked like a safe bet to win Senate approval even as other provisions — including the expanded background checks that remain a goal for gun control supporters — ran into trouble.

Now the straw-purchasing bill could be in danger because of NRA demands to change the language so law enforcement officials would have to prove that a straw purchaser intended to commit a crime or further the commission of a crime by buying a gun for someone else.

This was the first one out; this was the one proposal that actually picked up a vote from a Republican, Chuck Grassley (R-IA). But he's now on record not supporting the bill he voted for.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) fails to impress
“I voted for the trafficking bill in the Judiciary Committee, but it was far from a perfect piece of legislation,” Grassley said.“At the time, I explained that there were changes that needed to be made before I would support it on the floor.”
Senator Grassley hasn't said what changes he is looking for, perhaps because he hasn't received his instructions from the NRA as of yet. Since he's made his opposition clear against background checks and an assault weapons ban, however, Grassley's vote for the eventual legislative package is looking like a 'no' right now. As it happens, I know the phone number for Senator Grassley's Washington office is (202) 224-3744, and he's on Facebook and Twitter @ChuckGrassley.

As for the NRA, they're busy trying to make it tougher for this crime to stick, and they're even trying to take out a provision to confiscate the guns and ammo of convicted straw buyers. Even those who manage to get convicted of this crime -- should any aspect of that survive the NRA's assault and become law -- even those convicted and facing 25 years in prison ought not have their guns taken away, according to the NRA.

On the one hand it's ridiculous, outrageous; and yet for the NRA, this seems natural for them, expected. This is the NRA's predictable response to any stricter gun law: opposition. Even when they say they want to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. That's proven false by this; they're shown (yet again) to be liars and hypocrites. Their only interest here is the facilitation of gun sales. And they achieve this new low after being caught defending domestic abusers, and defending felons from being disarmed. So, again, it's only natural that the NRA would fight for straw purchasers as well.

Even the gunmakers ought to be ashamed of the NRA's spirited defense of criminal straw purchasing of their products, but I expect not a peep of protest from them. And their silence gives consent.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to The Tytalan Way on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 10:32 AM PDT.

Also republished by Shut Down the NRA and Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA).

Your Email has been sent.