You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Republicans are proceeding exactly as could be expected on President Obama's proposed Social Security cuts. First, they condemn him for "trying to balance this budget on the backs of seniors," and then taking up the cuts and pushing for much more.
This week, two House subcommittees plan to hold hearings on “reforms to protect and preserve” programs for retirees, starting with Obama’s proposal to apply a less generous measure of inflation to annual increases in Social Security benefits.
Also on the table are higher Medicare premiums and reduced benefits for better-off seniors, and a higher Medicare eligibility age.
Both means testing for Medicare and the eligibility age have been on offer in previous negotiations, so Republicans will happily go there now. Boehner has already dismissed the Social Security cuts as "modest." Obama's offer of Social Security cuts is just the starting point for negotiations as far as they're concerned. As usual. That's how it's worked every time Obama has begun the negotiations on Republican grounds.
But the White House and Democrats shouldn't be comforted by the fact that Republicans have embraced the cuts, because that's not going to prevent Republicans from running against Democrats on "trying to balance this budget on the backs of seniors." We've seen this game before with the "$700 billion in Medicare cuts" that Republicans hammered Democrats with while voting for those same cuts in the Ryan budget. That's what they do.
Democrats have one real choice, both on policy and political grounds. Reject the cuts.
Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 08:49 AM PDT.