This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Among the flurry of amendments Senator Lee (R-Utah) has added to the Senate's immigration reform bill is this little gem:

"Purpose: To exclude certain employment of domestic service from the prohibitions on unlawful employment of unauthorized aliens."
The upshot - them illegals are fine to work as "cooks, waiters, butlers, housekeepers, governessess, maids, valets, baby sitters, janitors, laundresses, furnacemen, caretakers, handymen, gardeners, footmen [footmen? Who the fuck has footmen in the 21st century?], grooms, and chauffeurs of automobiles for family use."

More on this latest installment of the Great GOP Hispanic Outreach below the curly-kos.

Read on . . .


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

You would think that, particularly on the heels of the latest kerfluffle from the Heritage Foundation, Republicans - especially the ones in the "cooling saucer" of the Senate - would maybe not suggest that it would OK to keep brown people around just to trim their hedges. Alas, character is destiny. So, here they come - with Lee's amendment to specifically protect undocumented workers who work for rich people (and, more importantly, the rich people they work for).

A few years back, here in Jacksonville, we had a high-profile deportation story. The owner of a popular local restaurant, as it turned out, was in the country illegally. So, after years of building a business, providing jobs and adding to the local economy, he was facing deportation back to his native India.

In my world, he was the kind of guy that we need in this country - a guy who built something and hired people. I want people, no matter their immigration status, to start businesses, to rise to higher-paying jobs, to do increasingly better for themselves, their families and their communities.

But in the world of the Far Right, deporting a "Maker" is just fine, if the Maker in question is, you know, foreign-y. No matter what someone has done, what they've contributed, if they're "illegal" they need to go (note: this philosophy void if Rupert Murdoch's papers don't check out). Rewriting the law to help people in that situation would be "amnesty".

But, gosh, how would we get by without Roberta to take care of the kids? How would the GOP donors (and the only part of the base whose best interests truly matter to the party leadership) survive if they were potentially subject to - gasp - prosecution over having undocumented workers dusting their living rooms and making their beds?
So the GOP is reaching out to Latinos - and saying "refill my glass, would you, Ricardo?"

I don't know what the odds are that the "Romney Shouldn't Have to Sweat His Lawn Service" amendment will survive the Senate Judiciary committee. They don't seem all that good to me, as even in the Clown College that is the current Senate Minority, there are people who at least grasp how this sort of thing looks, whether they object to the principle or not. And any Democrat that gave this thing more than an incredulous guffaw should have their Donkey Card revoked.

But the fact remains that this amendment remains. This kind of thinking, this kind of tone-deaf catering to privilege with a side of overt racism, hasn't even dimmed in the GOP. If anything, it seems to be cranking up.

Are these people seriously too dumb to learn, or just to racist to care?

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Dark Armadillos of the Soul on Thu May 09, 2013 at 09:52 AM PDT.

Also republished by LatinoKos.

Your Email has been sent.