This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch. &nbsp;REUTERS/Chip East
Get rid of the filibuster, win back the House, and THEN Orrin Hatch is irrelevant
Sally Kohn:
My friend John Fugelsang likes to say that the Democratic Party is like an S&M submissive who forgot his safety word. After the lame performance of Democrats in the immigration reform markup, I would say Fugelsang is being generous. Republicans are incredibly skilled at holding no actual power but nonetheless making wildly effective threats. Democrats on the other hand display the unique and vexing ability to have every political advantage and still cave on their own goals, more often than not preemptively.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I would not be surprised if the modern Democratic Party’s strategy is secretly being bankrolled by Eli Lilly as a ploy to sell Prozac to liberals.

What has Kohn so upset? That committee Democrats shelved Sen. Pat Leahy's amendment granting same-sex couples the same rights as everyone else when granting immigration visas, while agreeing to another amendment by Sen. Orrin Hatch to make it easier for U.S. companies to import workers from abroad.

The first is disappointing because Democrats should fight for equality, the latter because it makes it easier for companies to keep wages down by ostensibly importing lower-cost immigrant workers. And since Democrats have majorities in committee and the full Senate, Kohn argues, there was no need to court extra votes.

On the morality of those votes, Kohn is right of course. But not on the politics. Senate Democrats aren't engaging in a statement vote, a la the House's umpteenth vote to kill Obamacare. They are actually trying to make law. And that doesn't just require getting it through the Senate with that ridiculous 60-vote threshold, but through the tea party-controlled House as well.

Thus, Hatch's committee vote had less to do with getting his specific vote, and more to do with sending a message to conservative House members that even the conservative Orrin Hatch from Utah supported the bill. Of course, he doesn't actually support it. He's still threatening to vote against it in the full Senate if he doesn't get additional changes, none of which would be for the better. But that's why his vote was courted: The more conservatives they can bring aboard, the harder it is for the House to reject the bill.

And thus Leahy's amendment was doomed from the start. Not only were Senate Republicans threatening to blow up the bill over the provision, but it was a guaranteed non-starter in the House. Not to mention, the problem isn't that the immigration bill doesn't sufficiently protect the rights of gay Americans, it's that federal law currently discriminates against them. The place to fight that battle is over DOMA, particularly if the Supreme Court doesn't do the right thing by invalidating it. Get rid of that, and same-sex couples are on equal immigration footing. But blowing up Latinos' top policy priority, when Latinos are the most supportive racial or ethnic group on the issue of marriage equality, would be counterproductive.

If this was an exercise in political grandstanding, then sure, make the bill perfect and trumpet its purity to the high heavens. But this is an attempt at actual governance. And that requires compromises, many of which will be unpalatable. In other words, sausage-making.

If we want fewer concessions to asshole Republicans, the answer is simple: eliminate the filibuster, hold the Senate, win back the House. We do that, and Orrin Hatch and his friends in the House become irrelevant. Until then ... yeah, it sucks. But it's not a sell-out.

2:12 PM PT: Here's the argument, in short:

If the LGBT language is included, the bill is dead, LGBT couples are SOL on immigration matters.

If the bill passes, and DOMA is revoked, LGBT couples receive equal treatment under the law.

If the bill passes, and DOMA remains law, then LGBT couples are discriminated against.

Of the three scenarios, only one leads to non-discriminatory federal immigration policy, and that one requires that the bill pass without the LGBT language.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to kos on Wed May 22, 2013 at 12:09 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.