This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

When they're not plotting to destroy the ecosystem, I think almost all ExxonMobil Corporation shareholders must sit around gravely concerned about the "homosexual agenda."  How else to explain this vote today?

As expected, ExxonMobil shareholders again voted down nondiscrimination protections for LGBT employees this morning at their annual meeting in downtown Dallas.

Shareholders voted to reject a resolution, 81 percent to 19 percent, from the New York state comptroller calling for the company's Board of Directors to add sexual orientation and gender identity/expression to the oil giant's EEO policy. The 19 percent support for the resolution reportedly was the lowest ever.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

What are these people thinking? The business case was made, and rejected...

... the company should recruit from and retain the widest possible talent pool. Failure to do that leads to less efficient business operations.

Most Fortune 500 companies do have inclusive nondiscrimination policies including most other major oil companies, he said.

I guess no one even thought to present the ethical case, not that it would have mattered. (An ethics module in the prefrontal cortex is prohibited as a qualification for owning ExxonMobil stock.) You do have to give them credit for consistency, though.
It marks the 14th consecutive year in which ExxonMobil shareholders have voted down an LGBT nondiscrimination resolution.

We're equally indifferent to human life, liberty and happiness.
Property? That's a whole different oil field!

Sad to say ExxonMobil isn't the only responsible party.

Exxon says it would comply with an executive order mandating LGBT employment protections for federal contractors if and/or when one is issued
President Obama could make workplace equality happen in many US corporations with the stroke of a pen. Obama refused to sign such an executive order in 2012. He has come under renewed pressure to sign it again this year but there is no indication he will be reconsidering his decision to demand - but not push in any meaningful way for - Congressional legislation instead.

With Congress, especially the House, as intransigent on this issue as are ExxonMobil shareholders, the road to equal protection in the workplace for all LGBT Americans is still blocked, and seems like it will continue to be for the next few years.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to jpmassar on Wed May 29, 2013 at 01:54 PM PDT.

Also republished by Progressive Policy Zone, Angry Gays, and Milk Men And Women.



34%9 votes
42%11 votes
7%2 votes
11%3 votes
3%1 votes

| 26 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.