You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
There are games of musical chairs that you just don't want to win. Defending the super surveillance state is one of those games.
So, when we hear House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi join those circling the wagons to defend secret agencies empowered by secret laws, funded by secret budgets, and overseen by secret courts to the extent that their activities are secret even to elected officials with top secret clearance, that's not good.
Earlier today I wrote about the value of contributing good stories, as if they were stones in the arches that hold up the collective hall of our civilization. Those stories take many forms: good laws are one set. Another are acts of justice that contradict bad laws.
We are seeing ranks form, and form quickly, on the NSA data mining issue: Those who view the secret architecture of the super surveillance state as founded on good laws - that USA PATRIOT, for example, is darn good, does good stuff and it's a darn shame we can't tell you all about it, because secret. And if anyone were to try to tell you about that double secret awesomeness, then they'd be a whistleblower, which is even worse than 9/11 because.. well. We can't tell you why it's worse than 9/11 to drop dimes on the super secrecy. Because if we told you, we'd be charged with spying, and stuff.
But so long as you don't know what's going on... it's all awesome. Super secret awesome. And stuff!
As for why we must have the super surveillance state, the reasons why roll under that core line from the Declaration of Independence, I guess: We hold these truths to be self-evident.
We'd love to tell you what those truths are... but they're classified.