This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

I am a proponent of exploring the idea of a constitutional amendment to elect the U.S. Attorney General (as is done with attorneys general in 43 out of 50 states).  It would oppose the notion of a unitary executive by making the Justice Department independent of the president.  It would provide an opportunity to explicitly spell out the duties, powers and limits of the Attorney General and the Justice Department.  It would create another layer of checks and balances, by having the Attorney General not be beholden the President.  It would create another level of democracy and accountability, by which the public can signal its approval or disapproval of government.  If done during the mid-term elections, it would boost voter participation by creating a marquee national race.

So, how would recent issues affect a hypothetical 2014 election for US Attorney General?


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Let's say that 2014 would be the first such election.  Would Eric Holder want to remain in his job?  If so, would he be the preferred candidate of the Obama administration?  If not, would Obama be supporting someone else?

How much would the recent news over Eric Snowden and NSA surveillance affect these decisions?  Would a critic of the Obama administration launch a primary challenge from the left?  If a intra-party fight broke out in the primary, would it harm the eventual winner and guarantee a Republican win?  Would Obama critics react poorly if they tried to make the NSA a big campaign issue and got smashed in a primary?

What else would be an issue?  Will minority voters turn out in droves to support an AG who will give the stronger scrutiny to attempts to disenfranchise Democratic-leaning constituencies?  Will the American people react favorably towards a crusading candidate who vows to prosecute misbehaving banks?  Will the banks spend a ton of money to try to keep that candidate from being elected?

Would Republicans find a way to exploit the issue if a strong supporter of the Obama administration became the Democratic nominee for Attorney General?  Would populist attitudes towards issues of law and order mean that most Democratic presidents would have to deal with a Republican attorney general?  Would typical Republican politics lead to a string of hardcore social conservatives getting killed so that any Republican presidency is likely to have a Democratic attorney general providing a check on any conservative over-reach?

Would this be a good thing or a bad thing for America?

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.