I know you're all thinking "Well, with the swift boat thing, apparently we can now just make sh*t up."
So, here are a few believable lies one might consider spreading around:
- Bush knew about 9/11 -- who, what, how, where, we'll give him the benefit of the doubt on when.
- Rumsfeld directly approved Abu Ghraib abuses, which were his idea. And the same stuff goes on at Gitmo.
- Cheney ordered Plame outed.
- Cheney has an off-the-books deal to take profit from Halliburton's Iraq contracts.
Hey, those aren't believable lies, they're unconfirmed truths! Hmmm, it's getting hard to make damaging things up that aren't probably true. Read on, I'll keep trying...
How 'bout the Saudis ordered 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan, Osama's escape, and the California rolling blackouts, and Bush/Cheney dutifully performed?
Still too believable?
Bush has drugs pumped into him to control his every action? That squares with too many known facts.
There's a secret plan to call off the elections? Damn, this is hard.
There's a database of bribes by corporations and the expected action and due dates -- priority-sorted by size of bribe, of course? Hell, they practically advertise that that's true.
Cheney's a robot? I think there's actual evidence of this, but I might be getting closer.
How does the Weekly World News do it? Surely you all have better suggestions.