Daily Kos

Blog-Journalism: My Interview with Deacon at East Waynesville Baptist Church

Sun May 08, 2005 at 03:30:16 PM PDT

[Ed]: For those just logging onto this blog, here are some links as background for the interview: Here and here and here.

As the Baptist church fuss explodes outward into the national psyche and international press, I decided to do what every good regional blogger-journalist should do. Call the church members.

I've interviewed one of the deacons who left East Waynesville Baptist Church last Monday night, 2 May 2005. The deacon's name is Lewis R. Inman. He and his wife, along with seven other longtime members, left the church on Monday night because of an attempt by Rev. Chan Chandler and 40 others to have eleven members kicked out of the church. Two of the members stayed behind and have attested to the same testimony of the nine who left.

It was clear to me, as I talked with Lewis and his wife Sue, that Chandler went off the deep end. He alienated members who did not share his political views, telling those who were planning to vote for Kerry or any Democrat that they would go to hell. In October 2004 Chandler started his six-sermon series on politics which went right into election week. Inman and his wife claim that all the messages on politics focused on Kerry and why he was an evil man. Chandler was threatened by those who asked him to stop the politicizing at church. In fact, the "eleven" told Chandler that they would have to report him to the IRS if he did not stop. The church is part of the Southern Baptist Convention.

Then again on 1 May 2005, Chandler preached two political messages (one at morning worship, the other at night) and called a deacon's meeting for Monday night but invited the entire congregation to be there.

"Monday night was a lynching," said Lewis Inman. "He [Chandler] had forty people with him, twelve adults and the rest teenagers, and said they were going to vote us eleven out. In other words, if you had voted for John Kerry for President, you were going to be voted out of the church. And he only needed a two-thirds majority to do it. I guess he thought that 40 against 11 would do it. So nine of us stood up and left before they could vote. And the two that stayed can talk with you too about what was said."

Btw, I plan on talking with those two also. For now I'm talking with another member who was not part of the eleven but is (quietly) in agreement with the eleven. A morning of police escorts and cameras and journalists everywhere has made this church the emblem of what's wrong with right-wingism in America. More to come at the Daily Bailout and Chattanooga Pulse. Stay tuned. This is where blogging meets journalism.

[Update] at 7:15 p.m.: Lewis Inman made it clear that the teens and adults were new members brought in (recruited) over the last year or so by Chandler. The teens, according to Inman, were fired up and ready to expel the older eleven members. And when the nine got up and left, the teens jumped up and clapped and shouted in triumph. Certainly sounds like a young right-wing club to me.

[Update] at 7:38 p.m.: I'm scheduled to talk with another member shortly (via phone) and will be back later. Also I have scheduled two interviews with Baptist ministers here locally (in Chattanooga, which is only 130 miles from Waynesville). In the meantime, many of you are right on about the YOUTH BRIGADE.

[Update] at 8:20 p.m.: Waiting to talk with a Mr. Richardson who will be available at 10 p.m. Just a bit more from Lewis Inman. Lewis says that the organized group of teenagers are all new members (not more that one year) and have been taught by Rev. Chan Chandler's wife. "She and her husband [Chandler] have those young people wrapped around their fingers. They're [Chandlers] brainwashing them." Of course, Inman is a Democrat and a Vietnam Vet. He's 60 years old. And he was victim of a 1998 plant closing by Dayco Products because the plant was "too unionized." Maybe these are reasons why the battle at this little Baptist church has more to do with politics than faith. Lots of generational hostility, wouldn't you say?

[Update] 9:35 p.m.: Just talked with an ordained Southern Baptist minister in Chattanooga and he said that the entire issue is about Baptist polity. "Just look at the way Charles Stanley took over in Atlanta at First Baptist," said this liberal minister. "He divorced his wife, stacked the search committee in his favor, and has been running the place ironfisted ever since." What about those pesky teens? This progressive Baptist pastor said that again it is about polity: "If you have the votes, you win. Simple as that. Now if there was secular political organization going on, you should get the preacher's relavant sermons and make them public. Maybe this guy publicized them or taped them. Just get them. That would nail it down. Otherwise what you need to know is that politics is talked about or alluded to in most Baptist churches in the South." I know, I said.

[Update] 10:45 p.m.: Got off the phone with David Richardson a few minutes ago. He's a fairly new member at EWBC but very knowledgeable about what is happening. He was not one of the eleven to show up on Monday night last. The first thing out of his mouth: "This is not a show; this is serious stuff!" Richardson was interviewed on MSNBC today. He says that Good Morning, America! wanted some of the 55 people who have sided against the minister to come on tomorrow, but their lawyer said that would be too much. Here's the interesting thing: Richardson voted for Bush but is deeply hurt that his minister is using politics in place of faith. Richardson believes that such political decisions are individual or personal, not religious. He believes strongly in a wall between church and state. Which brings to a very important point again: the Generation thing. Richardson is 72 years old. He and his wife are retired. And he's been Southern Baptist for 58 years. When I pressed him on the point of age difference, he was hesitant and congratulated the Chandlers on their work with teens. But he had to admit that the teens may have been misled by the minister into supporting him on a political cause. Richardson assured me that the supporters of the pastor are in a range of age groups. But of course Lewis Inman has been there much longer. And I have to trust Inman on this one, that the teens and early-twenty-somethings have been "brainwashed." A little Hitlerian youth group? Maybe in some figurative sense. Even Richardson compared the minister's behavior to a dictatorship.

[Update] May 9, 3:45 p.m.: Just got off the air with WGOW's Max Hackett. We talked politics and religious, focusing on the Waynesville church. The news story will be out tomorrow morning. For now let me share this bit of news. Dr. Robert Prince, minister at First Baptist in Waynesville, spoke with me about necessary causes for the Chandler fiasco. One, the movement in the Southern Baptist Convention has been to push for more authority granted to pastors--therefore, the dictatorship potential. And two, the election of '04 increased the volume of Falwell/Robertson/Dobson activity, which is pushing Baptists to commit to supporting the president while demonizing Democrats. More to come tonight with an update or new blog. Thanks for all your responses and support.

[Ed]: A clarification about numbers. First, the church membership is about 400+. Second, the number of people who exited the church last Monday night during a "Deacon's Meeting" was nine (two stayed behind). Third, 40 or so Chandler supporters shouted and hooted as the nine left. Fourth, the number of church members to have joined the nine later during the week is about 40+ or so. Fifth, 55 or so of the Chandler dissenters met outside the church on Sunday morning and went in together today (per their lawyer's instructions). Last, about 130 (including media reps) were in attendance at the church today.

Tags: (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 182 comments

  •  Sorry about the brevity... (4.00 / 77)

    ...but I need to finishing interviewing before structuring the whole piece. For now you have a blog to start.

    The Time is Now For Change

    by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 03:24:32 PM PDT

  •  Good work (4.00 / 5)

    I'm glad to hear this side of the story. I'm looking forward to the larger story when you get it completed.

    I want to die like my grandfather, peacefully in my sleep, not screaming in terror like his passengers.

    by incertus on Sun May 08, 2005 at 03:28:25 PM PDT

  •  well i for one (none / 0)

    would like to see more of the interview.

    Anyone who advocates, supports, defends, rationalizes, or excuses torture has pus for brains and a case of scurvy for a conscience. - James Wolcott

    by rasbobbo on Sun May 08, 2005 at 03:28:43 PM PDT

  •  Thanks for doing this! (4.00 / 2)

    I don't know what the larger meaning of this debacle is, or what will come of it, whether other churches will follow suit or whether this will be generally condemned and serve as a cautionary tale about over-politicizing religion. But it's a fascinating story and I am interested to hear the details and the human angle of it.
    •  Really fascinating part is (4.00 / 7)

      that a break like this would happen in the woods of North Carolina. So I started digging. Seems that Inman--and others in the church--have been the victim of Deco's plant closing and moving offshore. Lots of animosity about lost jobs there.

      The Time is Now For Change

      by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 04:23:05 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  And they support Bush? (none / 1)

        Did they ever hear of outsourcing?  Did they think that the rethugs are keeping jobs here in the United States?  If the past 5 years aren't proof enough of the sorry state of affairs for workers, we haven't been quoting "it's the economy, Stupid"!
        •  Unfortunately (none / 0)

          Unfortunately for us, there's little evidence that Democratic politicians, as opposed to the Democratic voter base, are any more interested or even able to keep jobs in the US. NAFTA screwed a lot of people over and was passed by Clinton and a Democratic congress, with no corresponding increase in the strength of the social safety net.

          When people like these guys vote for Bush, that should be a signal to us that our credibility, the "ethos" part of Aristotle's three parts of persuasion, is SHOT and needs to be re-built. You cannot persuade if you have no credibility.

          A word after a word after a word is power. -- Margaret Atwood

          by tmo on Mon May 09, 2005 at 11:20:12 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Excellent work (4.00 / 4)

    One part of Inman's statement seemed very odd:
    "He [Chandler] had forty people with him, twelve adults and the rest teenagers, and said they were going to vote us eleven out

    Why so many kids.. it's as if the bulk of his support came from the most easily swayed (or brainwashed).

    We see this same kind of mind control used on young people in the neo-nazi and skinhead movemens.

    and of course in horror movies

  •  Meetings (4.00 / 3)

    From my personal experience, this kind of church meeting is usually very sparsely attended.  It was enlightening to read that he had done his dirty work  by packing a small meeting, instead of by a vote of the whole church.  That was a really amateurish tactic that is going to cost him dearly - I think we can safely predict that Rev. Republican will be looking for a new job when his contract comes up for renewal, if not sooner.
  •  Congatulations - it's good that bloggers (4.00 / 5)

    can do "journalism" too :)

    We are powerless to act in cases of oral-genital intimacy unless it obstructs interstate commerce. - J. Edgar Hoover

    by tiponeill on Sun May 08, 2005 at 04:03:47 PM PDT

  •  Good start (none / 1)

    Very curious about that teenage fan-the-flames-of-hell club.

    FYI - Your links need fixing - there are dailykos URLs mixed in with the target sites.

  •  Does this surprise anyone? (none / 1)

    http://noruleshere.blogspot.com/

    Not Noble Savage; he says that it shouldn't when Jerry Falwell is saying stuff like the 9/11 attacks are God's judgement on a sinful America and Pat Robertson is saying that activist judges are more dangerous than Bin Laden.

    I wonder what people like Falwell and Robertson would say if there were another terrorist attack in the next 1-2 years and they can't blame the liberals?

    •  They'll still blame us (4.00 / 2)

      Being divorced from reality is the wingnut's natural state of being, after all. It's just like Krugman said in an interview a couple of months ago--they'll blame gay marriage for any terrorist attacks.

      I want to die like my grandfather, peacefully in my sleep, not screaming in terror like his passengers.

      by incertus on Sun May 08, 2005 at 04:21:13 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Btw, the forty others ... (none / 1)

      stayed. The correct story is that 40 others were mainly teens who jumped and shouted hurrah as the nine left.

      The Time is Now For Change

      by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 04:28:36 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  So (4.00 / 2)

        the Asheville Citizen Times has it wrong? Just looking for clarification, since I blogged on this and used their story as the basis for my piece. The paper also said that the congregation was about 400 members--how'd they get the story that wrong?

        I want to die like my grandfather, peacefully in my sleep, not screaming in terror like his passengers.

        by incertus on Sun May 08, 2005 at 05:26:35 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  You're probably right about 400 members (none / 1)

          but not 400 in attendance from Sunday to Sunday. Evidently only about 100 or so attend on any given Sunday.

          Also the 40 leaving seems wrong based on my interviews. Seems the 40 were those ready to vote out the eleven. Of course only nine left on Monday, 2 May.

          The Time is Now For Change

          by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 05:30:53 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Keep it up (none / 1)

            You're doing a hell of a job. You might want to present some of this to the Asheville paper once you have it all in hand.

            I want to die like my grandfather, peacefully in my sleep, not screaming in terror like his passengers.

            by incertus on Sun May 08, 2005 at 05:38:50 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

        •  an update would be nice. (none / 1)

          Yeah, it would be nice to get an update about who has the numbers wrong.  I have one poster on another site who is adamant that I'm blowing this out of proportion because the new number is 100.  I've read here and elsewhere that it was 400, but now everyone is reporting 100.

          Public Interest Law: Twice the schooling - half the pay.

          by chassit on Sun May 08, 2005 at 07:11:06 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  The people I interviewed (none / 0)

            all said about 100 per Sunday in attendance, but about 400+ in membership: the point being that those who attend any given Sunday may be a fraction of those who have joined the church.

            The Time is Now For Change

            by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 10:27:43 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  "good regional blogger-journalist" (4.00 / 2)

    ...has a very nice ring to it. Thank you so much for doing this - I look forward to the finished article.
  •  sounds like a nervous breakdown to me (4.00 / 2)

    Although, given the way I feel about Smirky McWhacko & his team of Darth Vaders, I can't say that I don't understand confusing political passions with evil.   Of course, I'm not a clergy-person, have never countenanced banning anyone from anything anywhere.

    S

  •  Caller to Ed Schultz on Friday (4.00 / 3)

    Schultz spoke to an elderly woman congregant on Friday and she, too, mentioned the teenagers. She said that Chandler has been bringing lots of 'young people' into the church. (She was in her 70s so that could mean into their 30s, I'd guess.)

    Obviously, his plan is to take over this church.  

    Turn the Mountain West blue! Support Gary Trauner for Wyoming's only House seat!

    by kainah on Sun May 08, 2005 at 04:28:50 PM PDT

    •  That's my read too (none / 0)

      And Lewis and Sue Inman's too.

      The Time is Now For Change

      by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 04:30:10 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I wonder what the teenager' relationship (4.00 / 2)

      is to him? Is he intimidating them? Is there any possibility he is abusing them? It just sounds like such an odd thing for teenagers to do unless, as someone else suggested, they are white supremecists OR they are vulnerable and being used by him. I'm just asking--I obviously have no idea why teenagers would join him in these actions.

      The corporate media are destroying progressive Democrats. The Clintons are destroying the Democratic Party.

      by lecsmith on Sun May 08, 2005 at 04:45:42 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Doesn't need to (4.00 / 6)

        Lots of teenagers go through a religious phase, and if they've grown up steeped in Southern Baptism, it's easy for them to get swept up in the current wave of triumphalism and intolerance. Especially since they don't know their history, about how Baptists were once strong advocates of church-state separation.
        •  I can tell you (4.00 / 4)

          few Southern Baptist adults have any sense of their own history either. Most have no idea whence the Baptist denominations come, nor the origins of their specific denomination.  Hell, in the rural South many drift from church to church in the varying Baptist denominations and settle on a "home church" without even knowing the difference.  In my own neighborhood as a kid, there was a Primitive Baptist  Church (strict Calvinist Baptists as a denomination) whose entire membership and pastor were theological in dissent with the denomination, and seemingly have never realized that to this day (not Calvinist at all,in fact Southern Baptist in belief, but adhere to this particular congregation).
          •  What happened to that church? (none / 0)

            The Time is Now For Change

            by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 10:29:15 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  I don't know but (none / 0)

              In the late 80's it had a large moderate and liberal  group of churches, I gather they have been driven out since.  It is sad.
            •  Wait,southlib I munderstood (none / 0)

              your question.  I took it to be question about the Southern Baptists, but you meant the congregation I mentioned, right?  Well that church is still exists, but is much smaller after an extremely nasty split (another story unto itself), but not over doctrine or theology (they elect their pastors, and had one disastrously negative election).  They still are blissfully unaware of their dissent with their own denomination (the only such church in that area).  The only teaching from that group they seem to adhere to is the lack of support for missionary action.  Otherwise they are indistinguishable from Southern Baptists.  Mostly the congregation is of people who were raised generically as Baptists, and are members because that is the particular church they happened to "get saved" at.  
          •  Oh, Lordy, I know (none / 0)

            I used to live near the Free Will Baptist Bible College.

            They owned some primo real estate along West End Ave. in Nashville, because they bought it cheap back in the day.

            When I lived in the neighborhood, I used to go to my bartending job and pass by the girls in their long skirts.

            But when I venture over there these days, they have a logo and shit. It's weird.

          •  I'm projecting (none / 0)

            Just so you know.

            I grew up Lutheran, and I didn't learn squat. Johann Tetzel? Who knew?

      •  Reality Check (4.00 / 2)

        He's a Republican.

        He pays them.

        Think of these teen-aged Stormtroopers as obscene male cheerleaders who, if this were Texas, there would be a law against them and their lewd display of religious perversion.

        They burn our children in their wars and grow rich beyond the dreams of avarice.

        by Limelite on Sun May 08, 2005 at 06:27:22 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  AP story (4.00 / 5)

      link

      Rev.: Political Ousters a Misunderstanding

      By PAUL NOWELL, Associated Press Writer
      1 hour, 5 minutes ago

      WAYNESVILLE, N.C. - Calling it a "great misunderstanding," the pastor of a small church who led the charge to remove nine members for their political beliefs tried to welcome them back Sunday, but some insisted he must leave for the wounds to heal.

      The Rev. Chan Chandler didn't directly address the controversy during the service at East Waynesville Baptist Church, but issued a statement afterward through his attorney saying the church does not care about its members' political affiliations.

      "No one has ever been voted from the membership of this church due to an individual's support or lack of support for a political party or candidate," he said.

      Nine members said they were ousted during a church gathering last week by about 40 others because they refused to support President Bush. They attended Sunday's service with their lawyer and many supporters.

      Chandler noted their presence in his welcome to the congregation, saying, "I'm glad to see you all here. ... We are here today to worship the Lord. I hope this is what you are here for."

      But Chandler's statement and his welcome didn't convince those members who were voted out that things would soon change, and some called for him to resign.

      "This all started over politics and our right to vote for whoever we wanted to," said Thelma Lowe, who has been attending the church for 42 years. She and her husband Frank, a deacon at the church for 35 years, were among those voted out.

      "Things will never be the same here until he leaves," she said

      IIRC, it was Thelma Lowe on Ed Schultz's show.  She is an excellent spokesperson.

      •  Now repenting (4.00 / 4)

        "He's a wonderful, good old country boy," Pam Serafin said, quoted in the AP story referenced above.

        I think I know the type, he's got more fire than sense.

        But he's getting the message from his attorney, 'twould be my guess, that he overstepped and needs to repent.

        Heh, heh, just a misunderstanding!

        •  Good old country boys (4.00 / 2)

          Love the macho stuff and can be as venal and worldly as anyone if they see their eye on a prize.  He has forgotten his calling, if he ever had one to the ministry. This is serious. People like the woman quoted above need to realize this.

          War is not an adventure. It is a disease. It is like typhus. - Antoine De Saint-Exupery

          by Margot on Sun May 08, 2005 at 06:52:23 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  Sounds like (4.00 / 3)

        Sounds like Jesus must have changed his mind and decided to admit Kerry voters into the Kingdom of God after all!

        Dana Garrett http://delawarewatch.blogspot.com/

        by Dana Garrett on Sun May 08, 2005 at 05:31:22 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  history repeats itself (4.00 / 5)

    Certainly sounds like a young right-wing club to me.

    Sounds like the Hitler Youth to me.  Or the Red Guards.

  •  fix your links (none / 1)

    hey you need to add http:// at the beginning of your links so they will work
  •  I have a message ... (4.00 / 9)

    A simple message for these Children of the Damned:

    (My apologies to White Feather For Jonah for ripping off their image.)

  •  Good work, southlib. (none / 1)

    Keep us posted!

    Come, come, come to the church in the wild wood, come to the church in the vale.

    by pastordan on Sun May 08, 2005 at 05:21:00 PM PDT

  •  Teenagers?? (4.00 / 3)

    Since when do teenagers vote on church memberships? Are these kids old enough to vote in an election?? What kind of an adult lets children dictate to adults regarding their political views?? And I agree with the poster who asked, why aren't they in Iraq? If they aren't old enough to be in Iraq, they sure as hell aren't old enough to be telling the grownups what to do. Were their parents present? Are their parents church members? This is so over the top ridiculous that it's almost unbelievable. Any teenager who tells me how I should vote better have really good medical insurance, because they are going to need it!

    What happens when Bush takes Viagra? he gets taller. Robin Williams

    by Demfem on Sun May 08, 2005 at 05:25:04 PM PDT

    •  The teen thing is driving me crazy too (none / 0)

      and so I'm trying to angle towards that with the interviews.

      The Time is Now For Change

      by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 05:28:40 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  In the Baptist Church, You Are A Member (4.00 / 6)

      when you decide to get baptized.  Used to be when you reached the "age of reason," - usually at around 13.  Don't know how early the wingnuts have driven that now though.  The basic idea is that only you can have a personal relationship with Christ, only you can decide whether or not you believe in Christ, and no one else can do that for you.  Thus, no priests, and no infant baptism.  You have to decide for yourself, and you have to initiate the effort to be baptized. There are generally pre-baptismal classes offered to 12 and 13 year olds, but they emphasize the choice is yours.  Once you are recognized as enough of an adult to get baptized, you are entitled to vote at church meetings (only after the baptism though).  At that point you are also allowed to take communion - not before.  
         Of course, usually teenagers speaking up too loudly at church meetings is frowned upon, and there is respect for older people in the church - that's where the deacons (the "diaconate" or church council) comes in.  Usually you are not called to be a deacon until you have been recognized as a mature and contributing member of the church.  But the diaconate does not make major policy decisions for the church - those have to be voted on by the entire congregation, and you have to have a quorum to get to a vote.  Sounds like the 9 left so there wouldn't be a quorum.  Works according to Roberts Rules of Order, plus the church bylaws.  Sometimes you do get these Pastor vs. the Diaconate power struggles, particularly if you've got a power-hungry pastor or one who just can't help but cause dissension.  The power still resides with the congregation though, and it sounds like this particular guy is a goner the next time his contract comes up (usually does once a year).

      "From all that terror teaches, from lies of tongue and pen, from all the easy speeches that comfort cruel men . . . deliver us, good Lord."

      by md jeffersonian on Sun May 08, 2005 at 07:55:39 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Fair is fair is... (4.00 / 2)

        The downside of democracy is mob rule.

        The Baptists are one denomination that believes that each congregation runs its own show and makes its own rules.  So, for that matter, do Unitarian-Universalists and the UCC.

        We decide for ourselves, congregation by congregation, what the standards are for membership.

        Is it just walking in and signing up?
        Do you pass through a class to ensure that you understand what the belief system... culture... expectations, etc. are?

        The church in question apparently instituted the deranged rule that the pastor got to rule on whether someone was suitable for membership.  I don't know if that means that he can decide a member is no longer qualifies.  Either way, it's nuts.

        There are UU congregations that allow membership only to those 18 and up.  Or 17 and up....  Or 16 and up.  Perhaps with a caveat that with the minister's recommendation to the board, someone below the standard age can be considered for membership.

        Handing over control to a minister, solo, though... silly.

        If Bill Clinton was the first black president... why can't Obama be the first female president? -- wry twinger, DKos, 5 May '08

        by ogre on Sun May 08, 2005 at 10:12:19 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Thank you! This answers my questions (none / 0)

        posted a couple of times across diaries on this topic about just how it works in the Southern Baptists, i.e., are ministers called or assigned, etc.  This actually is crucial, as you know!

        "Let all the dreamers wake the nation." -- Carly Simon

        by Cream City on Sun May 08, 2005 at 10:22:59 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  Ditto -- no wonder they don't have to leave (4.00 / 2)

      if a lot of them aren't even old enough to vote.

      The economic situation of the town could explain a lot of the generational envy here, between the retirees and the youngsters whose only hope is probably to enlist and go to Iraq.  

      Reminds me of the '60s "generation gap" when the older people supported the war while the young ones were drafted or otherwise had dreams deferred.

      "Let all the dreamers wake the nation." -- Carly Simon

      by Cream City on Sun May 08, 2005 at 09:00:34 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Great connection to 60s (none / 1)

        I hadn't thought of it that way. Except now it's in reverse? Youngsters for Bush/War/NoSocialSecurity versus Elders for Reason/Jobs/SocialSecurity.

        The Time is Now For Change

        by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 09:38:32 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Yes, everything seems backward these days (4.00 / 2)

          . . . but then again, the youngsters didn't live through Vietnam, as many of us did.  Teaching American history to this generation two years ago, when this war began, was weird; I called it a potential quagmire and got a lot of grief for it -- except from the students who were in the reserves and Guard and on callup, who agreed!

          It also is so strange to find out the messages their generation get about the Vietnam War; they are absolutely convinced that we antiwar protesters spat on soldiers when they came home.  When I told them that I had been an antiwar protester, closed down my campus, etc., but supported the soldiers and married a Vietnam veteran, they just couldn't put it together.  And they absolutely cannot understand the impact of a draft.

          I think some do now, after two years -- but most still cannot deal with the cognitive dissonance of this war.  At the same time, some of the elderly in that congregation may have lost brothers, sons, nephews, nieces as nurses, etc., in that other war beyond the youngsters' ken. . . .

          "Let all the dreamers wake the nation." -- Carly Simon

          by Cream City on Sun May 08, 2005 at 09:54:12 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Bingo on the lost brothers/sisters (none / 1)

            in war-time, especially Korea (Richardson) and Vietnam (Inman). Let's give the greyhairs some credit--I'm becoming one at 45.

            The Time is Now For Change

            by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 10:00:24 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  45 is the new 35 (4.00 / 2)

              or at least I hope so, as I'm a tad older.

              And it is interesting that these older church members are again causing me to rethink what we used to say about anyone over 30. . . .

              Now, is it anyone under 20 who can't be trusted -- because they just can't know what we witnessed in the last quagmire of a (civil) war we lost?

              "Let all the dreamers wake the nation." -- Carly Simon

              by Cream City on Sun May 08, 2005 at 10:25:57 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  There you go! (none / 1)

                The aging process has sifted us into pockets of America, with diverse value systems, historical sensibilities, and consumer markets. I can't imagine Chandler ever getting back on the Baptist circuit if he's caught redhanded, as he seems to have been.

                The Time is Now For Change

                by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 10:33:51 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

    •  Kids can vote as full members in church (none / 1)

      Our church allowed all confirmed members to vote (that's the equivalent of being mitzvah'd where you are considered an adult by the church). That had been challenged in court once. The ruling was that the church was allowed to choose to let younguns vote if they wanted to- it wasn't the governmnent's buisness.
  •  great work! (4.00 / 2)

    but, where are the pundits and the "experts" from foundations?  I thought journalism meant that you would report on two opposing "sides" by talking to two people who weren't there, but represent those "sides."  

    it must be that "blog" part of blog-journalism.  neat innovation--maybe it will be picked up by the people in plain old journalism

  •  And another thing.. (4.00 / 3)

    If Mrs. Chandler is a teacher, where does she teach? If she is teaching in a public school and recruiting members for her husband's church from her students, she should lose her job. It's against the law, you know the one, separation of church and state? And teachers aren't supposed to politicize their students either, as far as I know. Why hasn't the school system gotten rid of this woman, if she teaches in a public school?? Either way, unless she teaches in the church school, she should lose her job.

    And you Baptist Kossacks should raise hell with the Southern Baptist Convention. They have apparently repudiated this sort of behavior and should back it up by tossing this church out on it's collective butt.

    What happens when Bush takes Viagra? he gets taller. Robin Williams

    by Demfem on Sun May 08, 2005 at 05:33:34 PM PDT

  •  What about the rest of the church? (4.00 / 2)

    I've been curious about the other part of the 435 or so members of the church.  So 40 others walked out, but I am uncertain where they were when they walked out.  I pictured the announcement being made after the meeting during a church service, when they said that the members clapped as they were walking out. Now we know about the clapping and who did it. How and where did it happen that 40 others sided with them, and left, and I also wonder about the rest of the church.

    There are still 390 or so left.  This must have caused a huge stir in the town.  Has anyone else from the church spoken out?

    As for the teenagers, those are the years when everything is at it's peak, including idealism.  I can see this being a youth club centered around prolife issues, and abstinence, virginity oaths, and other things, since on Olberman the other night, the member being interviewed brought up abortion and homosexuality, to quote him, as things they do not support in that church.  I can see that it would not take much to get the teenagers against the Democrats based on these issues, and their feelings at that part of life.

    •  If I understand this right ... (none / 0)

      only about 55 people were there last Monday. And the nine that chose to leave did so because they did not want to give the pastor a chance to directly vote them out. So before the vote, they left. The teens went crazy. And the "40" who are said in some reports to have left did not leave. They stayed, along with two others who were to be voted out.

      The Time is Now For Change

      by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 05:48:49 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Great questions . . . (4.00 / 2)

      1. There's evidently not only a great stir in town; there was a great amount of media trucks and personnel there as well. And then on I-40 there was chemical spill, which delayed the MSNBC interview with Dick Richardson.
      2. Evidently, there were about 40+ members--on hearing about the Monday night debacle--joined the nine.
      3. Yeah, where the hell are the other members?!

      The Time is Now For Change

      by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 10:41:30 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Minister playing with fire... (4.00 / 4)


    Nothing against teenagers, but Episcopalian parishes that wish to put teens on the vestry have been advised not to (or advised to take extreme caution), since a contract voted on by minors can have its validity challenged in court.  

    There's also the possibility that the nation is watching a small, conservative Baptist church morph into a smaller cult.  

  •  Outstanding work! (none / 1)

    I can't believe others aren't interviewing the ejectees like you are. I'm deeply impressed.
    •  There have been some interviews (none / 1)

      on cable news, but little longer than soundbytes.  I've yet to see print media do this in such depth.  Good work!

      "Let all the dreamers wake the nation." -- Carly Simon

      by Cream City on Sun May 08, 2005 at 09:03:56 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Thanks. (none / 0)

        I've seen the contrast in local news but never in national news. Now I know. I did a TennCare story locally that made the Chattanooga Times Free Press look like it was snoring. Now I see that the national media outlets don't do much better. Amazing!

        The Time is Now For Change

        by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 09:41:36 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  The good news about this, though, (none / 1)

    is it sounds like an isolated incident... a pastor who is teetering on the brink and looking for support from the youngest, most naive of his congregation.  At least it's not suggestive of a policy sweeping the nation among Baptist churches, or any churches for that matter, to rid itself of Democrats or, even worse, liberal Democrats.  Thanks so much for bringing more answers to this very troubling and puzzling incident and for bringing a personal touch to it via actual talks with expelled members.  
    •  Inman says that this happens at a lot of other (none / 1)

      churches. We'll see.

      The Time is Now For Change

      by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 06:43:47 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Ohio story (4.00 / 3)

        Before the 2000 election, the pastor at a church I had attended for about 2 years  said, "We ARE the Religious Right." Oh, shit, I thought. "Now, I don't want to tell anyone how to vote.  But..." and went on to differentiate between the 2 candidates. He didn't mention them by name, just by code words. "We reject immorality." That means, don't vote for Gore because he was tainted with Clinton's scandal. "We support life."  etc.  

        I left. I wasn't a good fit there anyway, I guess, but I had friends there and it made me mad.  

        War is not an adventure. It is a disease. It is like typhus. - Antoine De Saint-Exupery

        by Margot on Sun May 08, 2005 at 07:10:13 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  No it's not unusual (3.66 / 3)

      This is part of a much larger movement in the USA.  As we type, the IRD is attempting to take over the conventions and conferences of the Methodist, Presbyterian, and Episopal Church in America.  I wrote a diary listing the names and foundations that are involved in the attempted take overs.  They are having enough success to create a very definite problem.  The person in charge of trying to take over the Episcopal Church, and who was, until very recently, the president of the IRD, Diane Knippers, died recently.  I'm trying very hard to be appropriately sad about it but it's not taking
  •  If all Southern Baptist Churches (4.00 / 2)

    are talking about politics then they all should loose their tax-exempt status.  

    Abortion & Gays??? WHAT ABOUT THE DEATH PENALTY YOU DAMN HYPOCRITES!!!!!

    If Monica Goodling can pass the bar exam, so can I!!

    by lawstudent922 on Sun May 08, 2005 at 07:06:39 PM PDT

  •  Congregational coup de'tat (4.00 / 5)

    One of the things that's struck me about this whole incident is that these eleven members had a lot to do with how the church is run. Even the deacons, who are elected clerics and can perform pastoral duties, but have more of an emphasis on administrative functions in the church, including oversight of the treasury. Another of the church members kicked out was the church's treasurer.

    This makes me wonder a bit. It's pretty suspect when a new minister moves in and begins removing longstanding churchgoers in the community from church administrative functions, especially those handling money, and putting in his own friends and teenage servants into those positions.

    Something tells me Rev. Chandler is right, it wasn't political, all thou preying to that aspect made it easier to remove them. No, I have a feeling the real reason is pure greed, and Chandler's obivious and hamfisted way of removing them just saved the flock from getting fleeced.

    Amateurs talk strategery, professionals talk logistics

    by Young Freud on Sun May 08, 2005 at 07:20:55 PM PDT

    •  [Ed]: If Greed is the issue... (4.00 / 6)

      then the noose is tightening. Here's what I know:

      1. All assets have been frozen for two weeks now.
      2. No salary will be paid to the pastor until a suit is settled.
      3. The IRS may be investigating soon, if it has not already started.

      The Time is Now For Change

      by southlib on Sun May 08, 2005 at 09:46:27 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  The wheels of justice are turning. (none / 1)

        Proud member of the Cult of Issues and Substance!

        by Fabian on Mon May 09, 2005 at 03:54:35 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  I'm thinking the church should have (none / 1)

        an outside audit done on the church's finances as well. Just to be on the safe side.

        Those who are willing to sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither. (Paraphrasing B. Franklin)

        by p a roberson on Mon May 09, 2005 at 06:16:08 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Where the assets frozen before or after? (none / 0)

        I hadn't heard about this, but where they frozen before or after the incident?

        If it was before the pastor kicked them out, then that's more evidence that he pulled his coup de'tat on the church so he can get a hold of that sweet, sweet green.

        I would play Devil's Advocate here, and suggest that they're might be some impropriety amongst the eleven which resulted in this action, but the way Rev. Chandler pulled this stunt probably rules that out: if they were guilty of improprieties with the treasury, he would've called them out on that, and not because they voted for Kerry.

        Amateurs talk strategery, professionals talk logistics

        by Young Freud on Mon May 09, 2005 at 09:05:35 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Assets frozen for two weeks (none / 0)


          Today is May 9, so two weeks ago would be April 25.    After the assets were frozen, the first Sunday would be May 1, the day that Pastor Chan announced the meeting at the evening service.

          I wonder who froze the assets.  I also wonder why the pastor is not being paid -- wouldn't it be more ethical to fire a pastor whose services are not wanted so he can find a job?  And I wonder why it took the pastor six months to excommunicate Democrats in the parish -- waiting until May does seem excessive.  

          This issue is sounding less like a controversy over Red and Blue than it is over Green.  

  •  A fascinating story (4.00 / 2)

    and some great work there, southlib!

    The more I read about this story, the more I am intrigued by individuals involved, especially people like Inman and Selma Morris.

    In my head, I am casting the TV movie...

    Let's see.

    Chan Chandler can be played by Nathan Fillion of "Firefly," who also played an evil clergyman in the last year of Buffy.

    Selma (the treaurer) Maureen O'Hara

    Inman  by Sam Waterson

    Sort of an intergenerational saga of conflict and change with a touch of Deliverance.

    Good part for Kathy Bates in there, too.

    •  And ALL the "steel magnolias" again (4.00 / 2)

      because I just can't see enough of Shirley Maclaine and Olympia Dukakis getting DOWN.

      Now how can this plot line again work in the best movie line ever, by Dukakis, a la "it's the ability to accessorize that separates us from the animals."

      Wait!  The Southern Baptist women still wear those big hats to church, I bet.  The line is back in!

      "Let all the dreamers wake the nation." -- Carly Simon

      by Cream City on Sun May 08, 2005 at 09:07:33 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  write-up in Baptist news (4.00 / 3)

    about the dust-up here. Sounds like they're concerned about the loss of tax-free status. They mention it quite a bit, including this quote:

    "If indeed Chandler's pulpit statement was made before the November election and did not indicate he was speaking only for himself, it would be a 'pretty clear' violation of Internal Revenue Service rules against political endorsements by churches, said Brent Walker, executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty. That could lead the IRS to revoke East Waynesville Baptist Church's tax-exempt status."

    I think that's why the pastor has been back-pedaling today.

    •  Aha! perhaps this was provoked in some way (4.00 / 2)