Daily Kos

Reid Nails Bush and Republicans; w/ Video Link

Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:19:55 AM PDT

Update [2006-1-24 16:15:18 by MLDB]: See the speech at Crooks and Liars.

Update [2006-1-24 16:41:11 by MLDB]: Before he began his speech Sen. Reid played a video put together by the Center for American Progress. You can look at this 'pre-show' video at Think Progress. Give it a look. It shows how Bush is all platitudes and no action.

Raw Story has an advanced copy of a speech Sen. Harry Reid is giving today at the Center for American Progress.  It's kind of a pre-SOTU thing.  
Opener?:
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely."

He then proceeds to assail the Republicans: allusions to DeLay and Libby; direct references to Rove and Safavian leading to Abramoff and the K-Street Project.  His thesis?  
The Republican abuse of power comes at great cost to our country, and we can see it in the present state of our union. Special interests and the well-connected have grown stronger, while our national security... our economy... our health care... and our government have grown weaker.
The real meat of the speech, though, addresses national security and the economy.

First -- Security

Americans have heard tough talk from President Bush over the last five years, but the reality is, his policies have made America less safe.

The President's failed record speaks for itself.

Just over four years ago, Osama Bin Laden attacked America and took 3,000 lives. The President said at the time that he wanted Bin Laden "dead or alive."

But four years later, Bin Laden is still on the loose and continues to threaten America. Meanwhile, the number of terrorist attacks across the world has increased, and we now face the risk that Iraq will become what it was not before the war: a haven and launching pad for international terrorism.

Four years ago, the President declared Iraq, Iran, and North Korea an "axis of evil," whose nuclear threats we needed to preemptively strike.

But four years... 23 hundred American lives... and more than 250 billion dollars later, we have found that Iraq had no nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, the problem of Iran has been outsourced to Europeans, and North Korea's nuclear weapons program has likely quadrupled.

Four years ago , the President said in his State of the Union: "America will always stand firm for the non-negotiable demands of human dignity" which include the "the rule of law."

But four years later, we've heard that the President has ignored the rule of law in order to spy on Americans. We've also found that the White House given the green light to torture, even though it violated our laws and made our troops less safe.

After reviewing the Republican record, I know why Ken Mehlman and Karl Rove want to play politics with national security in 2006 instead of having an honest debate about who can keep Americans safe. It's because this is a debate Republicans cannot win.

Republicans run good campaigns, but when it comes to actually governing and protecting Americans, they have a record of incompetence.

Democrats know that keeping Americans safe means more than talking tough.

It means providing our troops proper planning and equipment, like body armor.

It means securing our ports, nuclear plants and cargo holds.

It means making 2006 a year of significant transition in Iraq.

And- it means doing everything in our power to protect, not trample, the rights set out in this document.

Tuesday night, the President must unite the nation behind our most important goal - keeping our people and way of life safe. We need to hear honesty and humility from the Commander in Chief, not swagger from the Campaigner in Chief.

And the economy:

President Bush is "passing along" problems to other generations. He's bankrupting our country and placing an enormous tax on our children and grandchildren, simply so he can hand out tax breaks to special interests and the wealthy.

Next month, because of George Bush's reckless spending, America will hit a debt ceiling of 8.2 trillion dollars

In 2005, we had the third-highest budget deficit ever - 319 billion dollars.

Two years earlier, we had the second-highest budget deficit - $378 billion.

And in 2004 - the year President Bush was re-elected - we had the highest budget deficit ever - - $412 billion.

In baseball, it's three strikes, you're out. But under the rules of this White House, that fiscal record is a home run for special interests.

George Bush has no one to blame but himself for today's fiscal mess. Not 9/11... Not a weak economy... And certainly not the Democrats.

Democrats want to return to the responsible fiscal policies of the 1990s - led by Bill Clinton - that yielded a budget surplus. We believe in restoring "pay as you go" rules. We've fought the president's irresponsible spending, and we've promoted a pro-growth agenda with tax fairness for hard-working Americans.

We have a proven record. The Republicans do not.



Update [2006-1-24 12:52:42 by MLDB]: Make sure to click through and read the rest of the speech here or here. I've hit the national security and economy angles here, but he's got more to say about Bush's doublespeak (i.e. "Clear Skies), energy, Medicare, 'honest leadership', etc.

Update [2006-1-24 15:30:0 by MLDB]: Some comments have asked about media response. The AP article is up. The second paragraph opens with Reid's Abramoff quote
"In his 2000 campaign, George Bush promised to bring 'dignity' to the White House but we've since found that he brought Jack Abramoff instead."



Tags: Harry Reid, George W. Bush, Recommended (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 117 comments

  •  thanks (4.00 / 14)

    lets see if it makes the evening news.

    fouls, excesses and immoderate behavior are scored ZERO at Over the Line, Smokey!

    by seesdifferent on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:27:16 AM PDT

    •  I for one (none / 1)

      would love to see it on the news (for a change)...

      If you won't pray in our schools, we won't think in your churches.

      by BlueInARedState on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:51:42 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  On the corporate GOP media? (4.00 / 8)

        Yeah they will headline it:

        "Reid Sounds Like bin Laden"

        We are never going to get a fair shake from the GOP controlled corporate media.

        We need to drown that baby in a bathtub and create our own media.  Yesterday.

    •  Yeah. (none / 0)

      It is great when we see it, but it is even better when the public sees it.

      Yes, I was the guy in the kilt at Yearly Kos.

      by AndyT on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:03:37 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Reid Gets it (none / 1)

      Keep the pressure on Bush. Keep reality in his face...And keep telling Americans how Bush is F*** everything up at home and abroad...
    •  Oh, it'll make the evening news all right. (4.00 / 13)

      "In further news, the democrats launched another vicious attack on president Bush today.  With us in the studio are these fine, upstanding citizens, who just happen to be republican congressmen, actors paid by the White House from tax dollars to express republican viewpoints, the president's press secretary, and scientists from right-wing think tqanks receiving millions of dollars per year from the Bush administration, to give us their completely non-partisan take on these vicious democratic attacks.  Mr. Scott McClellan, would you say that Reid is a knowing traitor to our country, or just criminally ignorant?"
    •  speaking of corrupt (none / 1)

      Mike Isikoff says on MSNBC that the Bush Abramoff photos are being shopped around by Jack himself.  

      Popcorn, please.

      fouls, excesses and immoderate behavior are scored ZERO at Over the Line, Smokey!

      by seesdifferent on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 03:24:24 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  That was a great comment. (none / 0)

        Loved the line about pass the popcorn, but my question is: if it is true that Abramoff is shopping his photos with Bush (which is beyond belief), isn't that just more evidence that it really is a game to some of these people.  See Arianna's comments about this past Sunday's MTP with James Carville and his unlovely bride).  
  •  Spending needs to be reduced (none / 0)

    but what big programs can realistically be cut?

    Every spending item has its defenders.

    No other success can compensate for failure in the home.

    by Sargon on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:28:19 AM PDT

    •  spending (4.00 / 10)

      Corporate welfare and wasteful pork spending can obviously be cut significantly.
    •  National Defense (4.00 / 2)

      We need to try to offload Iraq onto the Arab League or the UN.

      We also need to offer contingent withdrawal of 10,000 American troops for every month the insurgents and terrorists refrain from violence and threats against Iraqis.

      •  Interesting (none / 0)

        I hadn't heard of using the withdrawal of troops as a tactic to combat the insurgency. I'm sure it would have it's problems, but it's probably one of the best solutions I've heard to the situation as it stands now.
      •  Arab League is hoping we don't (none / 0)

        I'll bet the Arab League is just praying we don't think of this solution, since it would potentially pit Sunni vs. Shia, nation vs nation in the Arab League army.  Very touchy, not very feely.
      •  Way, way too late for that (none / 1)

        The Arab League and the UN will never, ever take this monkey off the backs of the US.  It is way too late for that now - I used to think like this too but having talked to folks who consult at the UN it just isn't a realistic option until the insurgency is largely quelled.  I have never heard of this contingent withdrawal plan before either, it's definitely worth some consideration.  For example 'refraining from violence' would have to be relaxed somewhat since there will never be a month in which terrorists refrain from violence against the Iraqis.  But it's an interesting idea..I just wonder whether the US government wouldn't use it as an excuse to keep forces there forever a la Israel in the West Bank.  

        Give me liberty, or give me death!

        by salsa0000 on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:25:27 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Cheney (4.00 / 2)

        was just in the mideast trying to get moderate Arab states like Egypt to send troops to Iraq, and probably strong-arming them (threatening them with cuts in funds) to do it--since it seems highly unlikely at this stage of the game. And given how Bolton and Bush have alienated the U.N. and are busy gunning for strikes on Iran, the U.N. also is likely none too eager to lend troops to what is--let's face it--a lost cause.

        No eventually we will admit defeat in Iraq, just like we did in Vietnam. That outcome is by now inevitable. The problem is the Bushies can't admit defeat (they're way too arrogant), so a more sane administration will inherit this mess.

        On another note, anyone see this article

        http://abclocal.go.com/...

        raising doubts about the authenticity of the recent Osama tape?  

    •  Taxes can be raised (4.00 / 13)

      on the wealthy as well--loop holes for corporations closed.

      "In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican." ~ H.L.Mencken

      by PoliSigh on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:50:46 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Lets go back to the days of Eisenhower (none / 0)

        when the wealthy paid their fair share of taxes.

        "I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president." -Gen. Clark

        by assyrian64 on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:55:21 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  and corporations (none / 0)

          Big oil & pharma specifically..

          Republicanus non carborundum

          by azureblue on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 11:04:44 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  Taxes (none / 1)

          Why don't we come out with a plan that says that $30,000 and under=0% tax rate, then 30-60 some marginal tax rate, 60-90 significantly higher, 90-120 higher yet. over 2 mill or some such number a VERY high rate.  This would give everyone the same treatment, I would not pay anything on my first 30 just like the poor, I'd pay considerably more on my 2nd 3rd and 4th $30k, and more if I made more.  This would also really jumpstart the economy, because young families and people in general who are on the bottom stages will spend the money, they need to have the money to spend.

          The rich can still use money to keep score, but the taxman (person) can scoop up the markers to pay for things that need to be funded.  Another advantage to having the rich pay taxes is that it gives them a stake in the system and should make them more chary of the pork-barrel projects so loved by congress.

          Lets see if the Repubs really think that Tax breaks jumpstart the economy, or whether they just think that tax breaks for them are good.

          "Time to focus on McCain and kicking his McAss." Angry Mouse

          by NearlyNormal on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:26:04 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  But, but that would make SENSE! (none / 0)

            Obviously that will never happen!

            Capitalism has to be the only competitive activity that is made easier for those who are already winning.

            John McCain--not so much old as obsolete.

            by ohiolibrarian on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 01:14:40 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  Not only is its sensible and fair (none / 0)

              to tax the wealthiest individuals, but it would also require empathy for others who happen to be born within the lower economic strata, an empathy dearly lacking in today's Republicans, whose only concern is to stuff their maws with more cash and accumulated wealth.

              "I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president." -Gen. Clark

              by assyrian64 on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 03:31:49 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

          •  There was a time when we used tax policy (none / 0)

            to make investing in things we needed to happen. Now we need altervative energy sources. To my mind a rich person should get tax breaks for investing in things like that. He wins if it pays off and does not lose badly if it fails. The people through the congress decide what areas investments are needed. That is the way it worked in 50's when the tax rate for the rich was high and how they got out of paying 90% rates. It creates jobs and fulfills a need. It was one of those terrible Liberal ideas that worked so well. The rich thought it was communism or something so they got rid of it

            In every moment of every day we only have two choices. Act out of fear or act out of love

            by Jlukes on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 01:53:26 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

      •  That's a great idea... (none / 1)

        Because the way it is now, I feel like I gave more tax dollars to the government last year than Wal-Mart!  

        Believe it or not, I like paying taxes.  I'm happy to chip in to help support the greater good.  But it hurts to know that multi-billion dollar companies and mega-rich individuals (hmmm, like our veep?) aren't being required to pay their fair share.

        "Love all, trust a few. Do wrong to none." William Shakespeare

        by R i c k on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:23:00 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Tax rates (none / 0)

        are only part of the issue.  We hear all the time about how "complicated" taxes as code-speak for lowering taxes.  The "complicated" part of taxes, though, is not figuring out the rate...the complicating part of taxes is figuring out the adjusted gross income that is taxable.  Stop letting the super wealthy hide all of their assets and revenue would pour in.

        "Politics didn't lead me to working people. Working people led me to politics." Barack Obama

        by MLDB on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:33:47 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  REMOVE ALL LOOPHOLES, (none / 0)

        all unnecessary projects and waste in defense, all the corporate welfare programs, subsidies to the special interest groups and pork projects and then see what adjustments to the tax code are necessary.

        Of course, if George becomes king, we can eliminate the expense of the legislative branch and the FISA court.

        No courage = No $$$ for Dems

        by MO Blue on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:49:34 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  To start (none / 0)

      Get rid of these ridiculous and harmful tax cuts! Then address all the corporate welfare programs for the poor and ailing oil industry!
    •  here's a wild thought (4.00 / 2)

      Maybe we should have the wealthy pay their fair share in taxes?  Hmmm?  Is this so outrageous?

      "While there is a lower class, I am in it. While there is a criminal element, I am of it. While there is a soul in prison, I am not free." - Eugene Debs

      by matthewc on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:14:40 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  When Bush hears this from Reid (none / 0)

    He'll know he'll soon be tree'd
    And he will get
    Himself all wet
    'Cause in his pants, he pee'd.
  •  actually quite good (none / 0)

    There are some good memes there. Now lets see the message get across.
  •  Why the HELL isn't this is SOTU response? (none / 1)


    Much as I'm proud of Tim Kaine- there is something about grandfatherly yet mob-busting Harry Reid looking into the camera, roaring fire in the background, and delivering this kind of harsh assessment.

    Dems need to use this language responding to the SOTU.

    Bush will be impeached.

    by jgkojak on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:40:35 AM PDT

    •  Dems need to use this strong (none / 1)

      straightforward and HONEST language every day of the week, not just in response to SOTU.

      "There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall -- think of it, ALWAYS." - Gandhi

      by hopesprings on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:44:52 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  This goes for the Dem talking heads too. (none / 0)

        Dem talking heads need to call out Rep talking heads when they use talking points full of truthiness (B.S. passed of as reality).

        Dem talking heads  need to stand up, look into the camera or right down at the Rep and call then a liar on camera. They need to stop trying to debate against lies, you can not win that way, the truth gets lost and the Reps win by giving the perception of being right. Call them a liar, explain what the lie is, and you defuse the talking point on the spot and put a cut in the Rep talking head's credibility and by extention the Reps.

        The same goes for Dem talking heads who hear a reporter repeat a Rep talking point that is based on false facts. The reporter needs to be called out and corrected on camera. If a reported is called out on a regular basis viewers will think the person is an idiot and he/she will clean up their act or lose ratings. This forces them to do their jobs.

        We can not take spin anymore. We need to not just fight spin with more spin, or debate it, but call it out first, then make them back it up, and when they can not, make them apologize.

    •  Agreed (none / 0)

      Kaine needs to come out swinging in the response.  

      I hated Bush before it was cool.

      by daveriegel on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:51:11 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  just a few simple questions here (none / 1)

      Why are you attacking Kaine here, now, before he even delivers his SOTU response?  What purpose does that serve?  Second, since there's no text up of what the Democratic response will be, are you privy to something?  And third, if the answer to the previous question is "no", please go back to the first question and reread it.
      •  I am privey to the track record (none / 1)


        All I know is the Dems track record... I'll expect a pathetic excuse for an opposition party and SOTU response until I am delivered otherwise.

        Its not 2002 anymore.  Bush should be impeached and has approval ratings in the 30s.

        There is no excuse this time.

        Bush will be impeached.

        by jgkojak on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:11:06 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  This helps...how? (none / 0)

          I am privy to the track record

          Nicely done.  

          </you know what>

          It's all been done in public.  Privy doesn't quite fit, does it?

          I'll expect a pathetic excuse for an opposition party and SOTU response until I am delivered otherwise.

          See the title of the comment.  And then 'splain, please, how that and the other such comments can do more to create a perception, even within our own numbers, of an effective opposition.  

          I am, with both apologies and credit to the estimable Miss Devore, calling for a "Kainescot" until the SOTU response has been delivered.  If he says, or does not say, things of significance, let's respond to that, not create the perception in our own ranks here that we expect a bad, or even indifferent performance.  

          •  I am CHALLENGING them (none / 0)


            To provide an adequate response...

            I am DEMANDING, as a lifelong registered Democrat, that my party stand and be counted.  This is not about pushing issues x,y, z... in fact, I believe if I hear Kaine say "The Democratic party believes we should raise the minimum wage and move toward health care for all" I will throw something at the TV.

            I believe that too-- but that is not what its about--

            It is about what Harry Reid says above:  

            This is a CRIMINAL administration, breaking the law, and luring America closer and closer to a Constitutional Crisis.  Period.  That is the ONLY thing the SOTU response should be about.

            Bush will be impeached.

            by jgkojak on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:03:46 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  Related (4.00 / 5)

    Dorgan is about to put a plan into action to take on the K Street Konservative Korruption.

    The Senate leadership knows they have to drive on the corruption issue to make big gains in the Senate in '06 - and the developments are going to come faster and faster over the coming months.

  •  Let's hope... (none / 0)

    ...Reid's message gets through.  The media like to accuse the Democrats of playing politics with issues, as if they've never heard of Karl Rove.

    "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson

    by rmwarnick on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:45:25 AM PDT

  •  " We have a proven record... (4.00 / 4)

    Actually that is half true. We have a proven record of SUCCESS. The Republicans have a proven record of FAILURE and INCOMPETENCE.

    God, when will the Dem leadership learn to be specific and thorough, especially with the punch line.

    Obama is the more honorable person.

    by oofer on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:46:38 AM PDT

  •  Proven Track Record. 100% <eom> (none / 0)

  •  Go Harry! (4.00 / 3)

    He speaks softly and carries a big stick!

    And we know he has right on his side.

    (Watchinig the Altio hearings this morning, I swear, Altio is so so extreme, that even the blackballed Republicans looked shame faced and weak in their arguments)

    Stand strong dems. We are behind you Harry Reid.

    Overthrow the Government ~Vote~

    by missliberties on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:50:04 AM PDT

  •  Wiretapping (4.00 / 4)

    This is a pretty good release, but I really wish the Dems had the spine to take the wiretapping issue head on (he nakes only brief mention of what is clearly an impeachable offense).  

    It's not about spying, it's about breaking the law, repeatedly and unapologetically.  It's about an out-of-control executive branch that is seizing all powers of government, in clear violation of the Constitution, at the expense of Congress, the judiciary, and the rights of American citizens.

    If they can do this, what else can they do?  What's next?  The Dept. of Justice's paper on the issue doesn't suggest there is any limit to executive authority.  This is Nixon territory, and I don't get why the Dems are so tentative to take this on.

  •  Let's just hope (4.00 / 2)

    that when this comes out we don't see yet another case of the Rethugs whining about "divisiveness" followed by  Dem apology.

    The response to the SOTU address should be given by Paul Hackett.

    Al Qeada is a faith-based initiative.

    by drewfromct on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:04:12 AM PDT

    •  Apologies (none / 0)

      Yep, no more damn apologies until the crooked Repubs start start resigning in disgrace, then we'll apologize to any honest Repub who is left if we've offended him.  Stop the criminal shit, stop the damn war, quit taking bribes and funneling money into your own pockets then we'll apologize.  Maybe

      "Time to focus on McCain and kicking his McAss." Angry Mouse

      by NearlyNormal on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:32:31 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Thank you (none / 0)

    for pointing us to this.
    Harry Reid continues to surprize me (in a good way).
    This speech should be published far and wide.

    obama muslim More wars; fewer jobs; vote Republican -- and get off my lawn!

    by middleagedhousewife on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:06:45 AM PDT

  •  I love this (none / 0)

    I especially like the idea of a speech before the SOTU
  •  Pitch-perfect, Harry (none / 0)

    Farking brilliant.

    Now let's get the rest of the Democratic party lined up behind those same ideas.  Don't get distracted, don't get cold feet.  Put in your own words, but don't stray too far from those central themes.

    Come out swinging, and taking no crap from Rove and the GOP, and you'll win in 2006.

    If you let Rove and pals frame the debate, and you don't respond by hitting 'em back harder, you'll lose.

    That's the choice.  Very simple.

    JOHN McCAIN = George W. Bush's 3rd term.

    by chumley on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:08:19 AM PDT

  •  Reid for President? (none / 1)

    Has there been any talk about this? Now I don't agree with him on some major points (bankruptcy bill, abortion), but I think he offers a solid Democratic stance that I could support.

    The thing I see about Reid is that he's the type that could appeal to Americans during this period. He's a fighter (and literally was), yet he also offers a trusting calming grandfatherly persona. The age thing is a little dicey, but it might work in his favor since he appears energetic and vital (especially when he's angry). And I think he's one of the few people who could actually take Hillary down during the primaries. Fantasy land?

    •  This is an interesting fallback (none / 0)

      I always thought Reid would make an interesting Presidential candidate:

      -Swing State/region

      -squeaky clean (he had to be to be gaming commissioner)

      -tough- no one can claim he's a wimp (how many clips from "Casino" do we need to show?-- and of course that FBI choking video)

      On the other hand- could you imagine if the Dems have the Senate and the White House with Reid as Maj leader what we could get done???

      Bush will be impeached.

      by jgkojak on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:55:25 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Fantasy land? Probably. (none / 0)

      But it's a fantasy I think I'll indulge in for a day or two.

      Hmmm. President Harry Reid.

      Who would his running mate be?

    •  I keep saying... (none / 0)

      Reid / Obama in '08.  Will someone tell me why this won't work.  This is the only guy with stones in the whole Senate and he can do it without pissing off the Republican "base" and face it,  we're going to have to convert some of them in order to take back the government.

      Size 7 1/4 Aluminum Picture Hat

      by fishhawk on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 11:51:09 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  YES!!! (none / 0)

      The more I hear from Senator Reid the more I like him and want him to be our nominee in 2008.  If he announces a run my check book is WIDE OPEN and ready to go!!!
    •  We need the adults to take back power... (none / 0)

      Senator Reid is the man for the job!!!
  •  There yuh go... (4.00 / 5)

    ...amid all the hand-wringing about how to counter Rove's strategy, here's Senator Reid to show us the way:  Tell the goddam truth.  

    The problem is not with the rhetoric of the Bush administration and the GOP.  As rhetoric goes, it's not bad.  "Freedom is on the march" would in fact be pretty darned inspiring -- if only freedom really were on the march.  But when it's code for "By the way, not only are Iraqis still being raped and tortured, but they don't have electricity in their homes anymore," not so much.

    Apart from the hardcore wingnuts, those who support the Bush administration do so because they believe the rhetoric.  The facts say otherwise.  That's a powerful weapon, if used the right way.

    "The Romans brought on their own demise, but it took them centuries. Bush has finished America in a mere 7 years." -- Paul Craig Roberts

    by Roddy McCorley on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:14:14 AM PDT

  •  I love the phrase (none / 1)

    "working for tax fairness"

    to counter the idiotic "tax relief" that really means "tax cut".

    Taxes are not hemorrhoids that need to be "relieved" - they are a necessary function of governement. We all have to pay our share.

    I pledge allegiance to the dollar of the United States of America, and to the corporations for which it stands, one consumer, under debt, invisible...

    by super ju on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:19:16 AM PDT

  •  And now I'm waiting for (none / 0)

    his apology to the Republicans, for saying things they might not like.  I have absolutely NO respect left for him after he wussied out on his comparison of the GOP to the Mob.  None.  Nada.

    "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."-- Isaac Asimov.

    by ssundstoel on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:21:06 AM PDT

  •  Pre-SOTU (none / 1)

    While I agree w/ REid about much of this, where he falls short, as Dem officeholders often do, is that he fails to offer positive, plausible alternatives to what Bush is proposing.

    Yes, Health Savings Accounts are a bad idea, but what's our alternative to improve the nation's health care system? And, again, we can't be "GOP-lite". We need to put forth a bold, creative alternative that will catch the country's imagination.

    "I'm not a member of any organized political party, ... I'm a Democrat." Will Rodgers

    by CCSDem on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:38:06 AM PDT

    •  But it's a SOTU speech (none / 1)

      He bills it as "the real state of the union" on his website.  (It's a "where we really are right now" speech, not a "where do we go from here" speech.
      I think it's his responsibility to counter the lies that the republican machine has been spreading, first and foremost and pre-empt the false rosey picture that GWB will no doubt paint on Tues.  I'm very pleased with his tell it like it is speech.  The time for positive alternatives is later, although he does allude to them in this speech.  For example:

      "In his 2003 State of the Union, President Bush called Medicare the "binding commitment of a caring society." Three years later, we can see it is not seniors the president cares about.

      Democrats have always supported adding a drug benefit to Medicare, but nearly all of us voted against the Medicare Bill of 2003 because it was clear that President Bush's plan would help drug companies more than seniors.

      Unfortunately, time has proven us right. The state of our union today is that we have seniors begging in the streets for the medicine they need.

      We need to fix Medicare and do it now.

      Last week, Senate Democrats introduced a plan to fix the Medicare crisis this White House has created.

      Tuesday night, we must hear a similar plan from President Bush. ..."

      That was from his website's copy.

      I thought it was great and just wrote him to thank him.

      obama muslim More wars; fewer jobs; vote Republican -- and get off my lawn!

      by middleagedhousewife on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 11:25:38 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Sounds like he read (none / 1)

    Dr Tom More's diary.

    Abe: My Homer is not a communist. He may be a liar, a pig, an idiot, a communist, but he is not a porn star!

    by Sylvester McMonkey Mcbean on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:49:55 AM PDT

  •  Give 'em Hell Harry (none / 0)

    Great speech-he hits all the right themes. Basically calls him out as a liar with the "doublespeak" stuff(finally)

    WAY TO GO

    Freedom is what you do with what has been done to you...Sartre

    by kevsterwj on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 10:53:03 AM PDT

  •  On the whole, a very good speech (none / 0)

    But I had a few problems with it, and one of those problems was right at the start.

    Many people will be turned off by a reference to "Lord Acton".   People don't like lords, unless they were some kind fo war leaders.  Harry Reid might have been better off leaving that unattributed.

    I think he should have used the word lie a lot more and terms like mislead a lot less.

    It would have been good to hear something about impeachment.  Probably too much to ask for, but still.

    Also, there was a repetitious grammar error about midway through that just sounds wrong (as well as being incorrect).  That's minor though.  

  •  Every Dem running for Congress (none / 0)

    Should use the text of the security section in their own campaign spots.

    There is so much ammo for this party to use in 2006, they just cannot be afraid to use it.

  •  Amen Harry! (none / 1)

    What a leader! He's hitting a grand slam with that speech. But will the networks and newspapers give it any space? Or will the traditional media ignore it with some lame one paragraph hidden in the middle of the newspaper. I'm not taking any bets on coverage!

    I love that speech though and coming on the heels of Dean, Gore and Kerry the fighting Dems seem to be in the ascendent...

  •  Ha! (4.00 / 5)

    In 2000 President Bush said he wanted to bring dignity back to the White House, instead he brought Jack Abramoff...

    Gotta love it!

  •  Namin' names (none / 1)

    John Kerry did this over the weekend, and here we see a continuation of it as well--calling out Karl Rove by name. Karl Rove--he of a possible indictment hanging over his head--is the puppeteer of this administration and is a name associated with lowball politics and absolute hypocrisy (Plame affair).  

    Keep that name out there.  

  •  We need to hammer on the fact that Lobbyists (4.00 / 2)

    are running the government.  Pick any federal agency and Bush has put a lobbyist in charge of running it.  Who is in charge of the forrest service.  A former timber lobbyist.  Who is in charge of mine safety, a fucking coal lobbyist.  The EPA, whatever, all of the federal agencies that are charged with protecting either the people or the natural resources are now in the hands of lobbyists.  And now that we are in the midst of a lobbying scandal we need to shout this fact from the rafters.
  •  Guys, not to be snarky (none / 0)

    but when does the part where Reid then proceeds to APOLOGIZE for saying such mean and nasty things about those poor, poor republicans!

    That just pissed me off to no end last week.

    Sorry but this "not in the face" democrat strategery fucking PISSES ME OFF!

    EITHER THEY FIGHT THESE FUCKERS AND MEAN IT OR THEY DON'T.

  •  NO APOLOGY (none / 0)

    Senator Reid was telling the truth about this President and his crooked adminstration, look what this man has done to our country, and Reid better stand firm and not apologize to these thugs.
  •  HOW ABOUT A SILENT WALK OUT FOR SOTU (none / 1)

    Why don't we send e-mails to our senators and reps to stage a silent walk out for the State of the Union, it would certainly be impressive wouldn't it, all Dems Senators silently walk out during the State of the Union address, that would get the media into a spin!!
  •  "good campaigns" (none / 0)

    I wish that instead of saying "Republicans run good campaigns," Reid would say, "Republicans are good at running campaigns." So often Republican campaigns are smear-driven, and I wouldn't call them "good campaigns."

    Help send troop care packages from Netroots Nation: Netroots for the Troops

    by roses on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 11:48:03 AM PDT

  •  Great speech (none / 1)

    The best thing he does show how incompetence, arrogance and dishonesty intersect in a way that harms our national security and our economy. The best way to challenge the Republicans on national security is to point to their record. "Talking tough" is not enough. Following through is the most important part. And that will resonate with lots of voters who supported the Iraq war but are disenchanted with the Administration's bungling of the occupation.
  •  Stop focusing on the attacks in summaries! (4.00 / 3)

    First off, thanks for the attention drawn to Reid's speech. I agree, it's a doozy. And I'm glad to have read the whole thing, which not only blisters the Republicans but also lays out key frameworks for Democratic policies that would be different and more successful.

    Herein the problem: this diary, while welcomed, excerpts some great attack lines while grabbing very little or nothing from the second half of the speech, where Reid lays out a number of Democratic alternatives and priorities to counter Republican mismanagement.

    This, I humbly represent, is what we ought to be excerpting and emphasizing in diaries. If all we do is repeat the attack lines, we salve the parts of our political selves that are sick and tired of losing and watching the country and Constitution get demolished by BushCo. That feels good, but it doesn't win the war. We win the war by offering our alternatives and arguing as passionately for them as we trumpet the abuses of Bush and his cronies.

    By repeating only the attack lines from speeches like this one, we contribute to the noise machine that makes it sound as though Democrats "have no positive policy proposals to offer". Let's attack, but let's accompany the attacks here as Reid has done in his speed, with statements of the alternatives, and with a positive vision of how American can do better with Democrats in power.

  •  We're behind him. (none / 0)

    Harry is politically astute and knows we have his back.  I love the guy.
  •  SHIT YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (none / 0)

  •  All fine and dandy, but........ (none / 1)

    This is all fine and dandy, but if Reid really wanted to nail Bush, he would lead a filibuster to block Alito from his media-proclaimed coronation to the Supreme Court.

    The stakes have never been higher to our party, to our country, or to our own civil liberties.  Whether our nation's fate is sealed in Fascism all hinges on whether the Democrats have the guts to filibuster and save the nation.  

    If they don't, our fate is sealed.  They control the executive, they control the congress, the only thing even partially holding back their fascist agenda has been the judiciary, and them even very meekly.

    Once Alito is allowed to sit on the Supreme Court, he of the Unitary Executive dogma, we will see no checks on the coming Fascism.

    I am serious people.  We will no longer have a free election in this nation as a remedy.  Diebold, Sequoia, and black box voting have taken away that prospect.  

    There is coming a fascist crackdown in this country as surely as the Reichstag fire was used as a vehicle for Hitler to declare emergency dictatorial power in prewar Germany.

    The fascists want to have records of what we are searching for on Google.  They are being allowed full access to our records on America Online and other Web portals.  They have been allowed open access to gateway phone systems by the telecommunication industry so they can monitor our phone calls.

    It is time to either put up or shut up, my fellow Democrats.  If we don't do something, if the Senate does not filibuster, everything is lost.

    When will martial law be declared?  When will they come after Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, the Kossacks?  The membership list of Moveon.org or John Kerry.com?  The ACLU?  The answer is sooner than you think.

    "The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself."-FDR

    by Michigan Paul on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:20:56 PM PDT

  •  Reid for President 2008 (none / 1)

    Wish is straight talk was there in 2004... but the future holds promise for our next President!!!

    REID FOR PRESIDENT!!!!

  •  FIVE * * * * * FOR REID (4.00 / 2)

    "Campaigner in Chief" I just love this description.  Democratic spokespersons should adopt this in their talking points.  Something to the effect: America needs more than tough talk by the "Campaigner in Chief"; it needs concrete WELL PLANNED actions to keep America safe. The one thing that the Democratic speakers fail to realize is that repetition works.  A strong, effective message needs to be repeated as often as possible so that more people hear it and it becomes embedded in the minds of the public.

    The next thing that needs to happen is for the party to find a way to successfully get their message out to the American people.  If the MSM is not going to do the job, maybe we need to start distributing handouts door to door or through the mail.  Somehow we need to get the message out to people who are not regularly involved in the process. This blog is wonderful and does quite well getting ideas going, but in order to win we need to find a way to get others involved and not just preach to the choir.

    No courage = No $$$ for Dems

    by MO Blue on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:33:53 PM PDT

    •  Why have not the Democrats done this? (none / 0)

      Your idea of passing out handouts door to door is great.  We have been living under a rightwing corporate media and fascist state since 2000.  The Democratic leaders know this.  And they don't care.  They still get paid their lofty salaries. They still get their egos stroked by going on CNN and MSNBC and the networks and are given their 15 second sound bite.

      But the American people are getting fed a steady, brainwashing diet of rightwing propaganda.  Any other political party with an ounce of backbone or creativity would have done something by now to get their message through the rightwing corporate filter.

      The Democrats should be out leafletting door to door, at the mall, over local access cable, hell they should be sending people out to talk to the people at the thousands of churches across the nation like the Republicans do.

      But they do nothing.  They make a few speeches, sound angry for the cameras, and then sit back and do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING while the nation sinks into Fascism.  

      "The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself."-FDR

      by Michigan Paul on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 12:46:48 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Axis of Evil vs. BushCo 'Axis of Incompetence' (none / 0)

    Everything is funny as long as it is happening to somebody else. --Will Rogers

    by groggy on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 01:06:22 PM PDT

  •  A case of be careful of what you wish for (none / 0)

    Bush wanted the Congress and the American people to believe that Iraq was a terrorist state. Now it is.
    •  Pre-emptive (none / 0)

      I'm hoping for a solid week of this sort of whoop-ass that also clearly and forcefully presents Democratic alternatives.

      And then I want to see Tim Kaine clean W's clock on domestic issues.

      And the next day I want to see Jack Murtha clean W's clock on national security.

      And the next day, I want to see some quiet-as-a-mouse Dem in the House of Representatives speak up forcefully and loudly against some other Bush outrage.

      Well, one can still hope, can't one?

  •  anyone notice? (none / 0)

    After Bush gets caught he delivers a defense that is easily refuted.  Then he comes back with another defense - easily refuted. Then he sends out his goons - who keep trying to "make it all better" with 1984 doublespeak. They say they're doing A -- but all the evidence is B. This has happened with Iraq, Katrina, spying, and the mine disasterS - and probably others.  
    Hey - with Bush we get - lying, spying, and dying!!

    Dems will not hold impeachment hearings while Bill is campaigning with Hillary.

    by annefrank on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 01:55:02 PM PDT

  •  Campaigner in Chief (none / 0)

    Ooh, I like that. We should use that a lot. I bet that would really get under His Codpiece's skin because he so loves his little symbolic world of military references!
  •  President Reid (none / 0)

    Nuff said.

    I drink your Republicans. I drink them up!

    by Splicer on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 02:23:25 PM PDT

  •  Reid is great until... (none / 0)

    he apologizes and hides under his chair like every other Democrat. Why wasn't there outrage, seething, pulling of hair at dKos when this happened? I mean, this was the depths of flaccidity, and yet I didn't see the boards light up. "Reid '08"? Yeah, right. He's a decent Senator, but that's not saying much in Presidential politics, precisely because of this kind of crap.

    Barack Obama is a noble-hearted patriot and humble Christian, and he has my full faith and support.

    by benheeha on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 02:45:43 PM PDT

  •  Reid's Orwell Comments - Add a Few More Harry!! (none / 0)

    Just helpin' Harry along -

    Orwellian bills passed under Bush:

    1. Deficit Reduction Act - "Gives special deductions to his fucking rich friends".

    2. Patriot Act - "Patriots becoming the enemy".

    3. "Help America Vote Act" (HAVA) in 2002 - arraigning for vote fraud

    4. "US Census: American Community Survey" - Snooping into everyone's business under penalty of law - 24 pages of questions.

    5. "New Freedom Initiative" - Screen your kids for mental health problems so pharmaceutical Companies can sell more drugs.

    6. "NCLB: No child left behind" - so the Army has access to a database of schoolkids to assist in recruiting.

    7. "Clear Skies Act," - which increases allowable levels of pollution and mercury contamination  

    8. "Healthy Forests Act," - which permits clear cutting and the destruction of forests.

    9. "Model Emergency Health Powers Acts." (MEHPA) - complete with everything from property confiscation to "Quarantine Camps," on par with the Nazi Concentration Camps.
  •  Can The Democrats (none / 0)

    Force a resolution, or law or something that states that when the President gives SOTUA, that he be held legaly accountable for accuracy of data, facts, and information given?  

    So if, for example, Bush states that Iran has (fill-in-the-blank), and are an imminant threat to the US, and that (fill-in-the-blank) has reported this very damning threat assessment to the US...... (we all know the drill I think)----- when Bush says this stuff and when it's proven false that he will have broken the law?

    Just a fantasy I guess....

    Kafka: The Trial; Republicans: In power.......... What's the difference?

    by ekeithj on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 03:40:43 PM PDT

  •  Senator Reid's Speech (none / 1)

    Senator Reid should have added that the Republicans are governing as though they have another planet to go to when Bush leaves office.
  •  Dems talking points (none / 0)

    Now I hope the speech is sent to all Dems to memorize and repeat to anyone who would listen 100 times a day until election day.

    Any Dem representative going on media should memorize the speech and the talking points and repeat it 100 times.

     

    Fact check Obama spins on Hillary http://facts.hillaryhub.com/

    by timber on Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 04:46:45 PM PDT

  •  Campaigner in Chief (none / 0)

    The empty suit that launched a thousand points of propaganda
  •  Campaigner in Chief (none / 0)

    The empty suit that launched a thousand points of propaganda

Permalink | 117 comments