Very wierd result in the CT race. Lamont loses with EXACT number that republican did in 2000
Okay I was wondering how LIEberman did in 2000 so after spending a half hour trying to track down the numbers I found them on the FEC site.
(I just rechecked the numbers and I had copied them wrong. they are exactly the same)
In 2000 here is the break down in voting per
http://www.fec.gov/....
www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/senparty.htm
Democratic votes = 828,902
Republican votes = 448,077
Other votes = 34,282
okay now lets look at 2006
http://www.cnn.com/....
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/senate/
Lieberman votes = 562,850
Lamont votes = 448,077
Schlesinger votes = 109,329
Ferrucci votes = 5923
Knibbs votes = 4638
Somebody should have played the lottery because the odds of Lamont losing in 2006 with the EXACT amount of votes the republican lost with in 2000 is astronomically high.
wierd.
Anybody have any thoughts on this?