Skip to main content

After Tuesday's Kentucky election where Democrats greatly benefited from the scandals of the current GOP Governor, attention has immediately turned to who will run against Senator McConnell in November '08. We need to focus on who is the best candidate for the job, and who is the best candidate in a matchup against Mitch.

It seems that the new leadership of the Kentucky Democratic Party is split over two names Lt. Col.  Andrew Horne and  Crit Luallen. While Crit Luallen does has decent name ID, she is liked amongst small Democratic circles and has some things to offer a voter keen to dismiss McConnell, she will not appeal to the necessary majority nearly enough to grant her McConnell's Senate seat. I like her a LOT, but she is not ready to take on the McConnell machinery. I wish that were not the case, but McConnell will rip her to pieces in a general and win yet another term.

The Question Democrats in Kentucky have to answer, Lt. Col. Andrew Horne or Crit Luallen?

For the sake of brevity, I will lay out the top ten (of many) reasons why I believe that Lt. Col. Andrew Horne is the one and only candidate that can give Sen. McConnell a real run for his money.

  1. USMC Lt. Col. [Ret.] Horne will appeal to the most loyal voters of both political parties: 65+, ALL of whom have personal or indirect affiliation with the Armed Forces. Mitch McConnell does not, Greg Stumbo does not, Crit Luallen does not.
  1. Lt. Col. Horne has served in Iraq (twice) and understands how our strategy in Iraq (and the wider Middle East) needs to be strategically refocused in order to promote sound national security policies. He has repeatedly spoken about this number one issue for voters and lobbied Congress on our behalf. In Kentucky he is considered to be the authoritative voice on the need for a responsible redeployment of our troops and the demand to treat them well upon completion of their service. While not the only issue he is prepared to tackle, he is the only potential candidate that can adequately keep the reckless Iraq War as a major campaign issue.
  1. A military vet running for the seat of the current Republican Senate Leader will produce countless national headlines... and campaign donations from around the country.
  1. On March 31st, 2007 Horne was chosen to deliver the Democrats' weekly radio address on H.R. 1591 because he is a nationally recognized advocate for military strength and veterans' care. As a Senior Advisor to, Horne is already familiar to numerous national anti-Iraq War organizations (all of which have a PAC that can benefit his campaign coffers).
  1. Horne does not belong to either of the factions of the Kentucky Democratic Party. He is not a career politician. He is a lawyer and a veteran. He understands the law (and how to make them) and that millions of people are fighting for the success of our nation, not for the dominance of one political party. Kentucky has recently shown that it is not red, not blue... it is a purple state. Hyper-partisanship no longer appeals to KY voters.
  1. Andrew Horne is a long time supporter of organized labor. Organized labor is a long time supporter of Andrew Horne. Mitch McConnell has made it abundantly clear that he is no friend of the labor unions. They will remind him of that all year long if we give them a candidate to truly rally behind.
  1. Andrew Horne is an actual human being, not a cookie cutter politician. He is the kind of guy you want to have a beer with at the end of a long day at work. Horne is a tall, strong and good looking man. Deny it as we may, looks play a part (consciously or not) in American electoral politics. Men, women and reporters enjoy spending time with (and voting for) someone who looks and genuinely "acts the part". After all, this is still Kentucky! Voters in Kentucky cast ballots for someone that reminds them of themselves... Some argue that George W. Bush carried KY twice for that sole reason.
  1. Crit Luallen was JUST re-elected as State Auditor. To turn around and almost immediately refile for U.S. Senate would put a bad taste in a LOT of voters' mouths (which she would have to do to start raising money to try to compete with McConnell's enormous war chest)... and let's face it, Greg Stumbo just has too much baggage to carry another statewide election. He needs roll his exploratory committee funds over to run for Hal Rogers' seat... and win! (and hold that seat for life, probably)
  1. Mitch McConnell has a long history of making the campaign about "the other guy's" past. Crit Luallen and Greg Stumbo both have public records that McConnell see as red meat and he will manipulate that past (which is a trait that McConnell has mastered). Horne's background includes being a small business owner, a private practice lawyer and a rise to the rank of Lt. Col. in the USMC. To attack the past of an Iraq War vet is unacceptable in KY. Any outside "swiftboat" ad will be regarded by voters as a negative and self-destructive tactic by Team McConnell.
  1. Mitch's current campaign funds are somewhere shy of $10 million. Whoever becomes the nominee will be living and fighting a "David vs. Goliath" campaign. To be truly seen as a VIABLE candidate to overcome the odds, one has to be perceived as a true fighter for ALL American people.  To lack this vision while selecting our candidate would hand the seat to Mitch for another six years with no need for any election at all! Could there really be any Kentuckian better suited for the task than Andrew Horne?

As a Kentuckian, I fear that the wrong person will be propped up just because she is a party insider. I like Crit a lot... but I like her as I voted for her yesterday, as State Auditor. I do not want to see McConnell be granted another SIX YEARS because we did not provide the voters with a plausible and viable alternative. It is time to DRAFT HORNE

Originally posted to KentuckyElections on Thu Nov 08, 2007 at 04:45 PM PST.


Who is The Best Candidate Against Mitch McConnell

11%6 votes
60%32 votes
28%15 votes

| 53 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  If I remember right he was one of the "Fighting (0+ / 0-)

    Dems" who ran for Congress  last year  and has an excellent military record and had the support of Wes Clark and many others....

    •  You are correct (0+ / 0-)

      Andrew was one of the Fighting Dems in '06.  I'm surprised more of them didn't win those races.  But I have a strong feeling about a Statewide run in Kentucky for Andrew.  Here in Louisville, strong anti-war sentiment was what propelled Yarmuth into office.  I don't think that mood carries over to the rest of the state, but I do think that voters in the rest of the state are weary of this no-accountability leadership, they are seeing it firsthand when their sons and daughters are redeployed.  Of all the states, I think Kentucky might have the highest percentage of the population support the military -- and in these current times, supporting the military doesn't mean supporting Mitch.

      "If you dig a hole deep enough, you'll get to China. We're there." - D. Kucinich

      by winstnsmth on Fri Nov 09, 2007 at 05:54:17 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  I'm reading about Kentucky politics (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    and eating Kentucky Fried Chicken at the same  I think Andrew Horne is a good candidate and would give McConnell a run for his money.  Do you have any insight though on why he was so trounced by John Yarmuth in the KY-03 primary though?  I'm not bringing that up to detract from his candidacy but I do think it's something that needs to be addressed if Horne is going to successfully take on McConnell.  One argument to be made for Crit Luallen is that she's a proven vote getter.  

    Build the Wilshire Subway!

    by SoCalLiberal on Thu Nov 08, 2007 at 08:52:14 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site