It's clear to everyone that Dennis J. Kucinich is the candidate with no strings attached, willing to call for Impeachment, willing to cut the profit motive out of health insurance, willing to change into a pro-choice Progressive... the non-insane proven choice for whom we've been waiting to prove to the world that we're still human, right?
Or is admitting to seeing a UFO or supporting equal rights for all Americans just too embarrassing for those who think we can't win without a Southern Accent Strategy?
"I can win if you vote for me"
Dennis J. Kucinich on Ed Schultz show Sept 12, 2007
During the last debate when Edwards condescendingly called Dennis or his reasoned comment "cute" he showed us a rare view as to just how unimpressive he is.
( Does anyone remember how he already won the Vice Presidency once, but didn't cry foul? )
For those of you still under the impression that John Edwards is a real leader with Wisdom of his Own, I've linked below to a post Dennis put up on his site:
Edwards’ pro-war posture in ’04 raises serious credibility questions.
MANCHESTER, NH -- Revelations in today’s New York Times regarding John Edwards’ staunch pro-war stance as a Vice Presidential candidate in 2004 “raise serious questions about the credibility of his positions on every issue being debated in this Presidential campaign,” Ohio Congressman and Democratic Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich said today.
“Voters have every right to ask, ‘Were you telling the truth then, John, or are you telling the truth now?’ And Senator Edwards has a responsibility to answer,” Kucinich said.
In a major story today about the relationship between Edwards and Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry during the 2004 campaign, the Times reported, “Mr. Kerry had increasing doubts about the war. But Mr. Edwards argued that they should not renounce their votes — they had to show conviction and consistency.” Edwards was a co-sponsor of the 2002 war authorization resolution, along with Sen. Joseph Lieberman.
“Mr. Kerry yielded to his running mate,” according to the Times story, and told reporters early in the 2004 campaign that he would still have voted for the 2002 war authorization even knowing that Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction. Six weeks later, in a speech at New York University, he reversed himself, over the objections of Edwards, the Times reported.A year later, in an opinion piece published in The Washington Post, Edwards reversed his own position, a move that some Kerry aides described as “politically expedient” in the planned run-up to the 2008 Presidential campaign.
“John Kerry was hammered by the Republicans and by many in the media for changing his positions on the war and other issues in the 2004 campaign,” Kucinich noted. “The fact of the matter is that he wanted to come out against the war in 2004, and John Edwards argued against it.”
“Now,” Kucinich continued, “we have a candidate who voted for the war and voted to fund the war, but says he against it. He voted for the Patriot Act, and now he complains about its abuses. He voted for China Trade in 2000 knowing that Americans would be hurt, and now he’s decrying the unsafe products pouring into this nation from China. He supported nuclear waste dump at Yucca Mountain, now he’s against it.”“Will the real John Edwards please stand up?” Kucinich said.
here's the Times article (another serial offender)
Hey People!
Wake out of yer slumber Ye of weak faith in the ascendancy of the so-called "Meek" with righteous track records and the courage to keep a mole, if one were to have one.