So you want to be President, but you're facing someone who's a better candidate for the position. He's smart, inspiring, and has shown better judgment than you. He's the best choice to lead this country out of the mess you helped create.
But don't despair. You can still win. Because that's what's important to you. You just have to frame the discussion in your terms.
Problem: He's held elected office longer than you.
You say: He's inexperienced.
Problem: He's a better orator than you.
You say: It takes more than speeches to lead a country.
Problem: He inspires people far more than you.
You say: His passionate supporters are creepy and cult-like.
Problem: He's raising more money than you from the public.
You say: He should accept public financing.
Problem: He has a track record of being right.
You say: We had to trust the information we were given at the time.
Problem: He's taken bold progressive stands.
You say: Nobody knows what he stands for.
With my help, we can beat this upstart. We can keep his ideas from spreading. Yes, we can.
Update
The "tips" post at the top is not mine. The real tip jar is here.
Don't miss the additions below by Donald Drennon and by brooklynbadboy. Here's one from each; click the links to read more and recommend.
Problem: He wins in states with insignificant black populations and cuts into every demographic group.
You say: Well we weren't going to win these states in November anyway and besides caucuses are undemocratic and oh yeah the press favors Obama anyway and wait until the GOP attack machine gets into this.
-- Donald Drennon
Problem: You can't manage to lead your own campaign staff effectively.
You say: You are ready to lead on day one.
-- brooklynbadboy