What a bold faced political ploy to try and cancel a presidential debate under the guise of putting aside politics. Let me reveal to you the actual motivation behind this pathetic gambit:
(cross-posted at my brand spanking new blog, here )
....over the fold....
John McCain's polling numbers rise when the dialogue is centered on foriegn affairs and warfare, inasmuch as this is seen as his strong suite. This actually begs the question as to whether or not he has any worthwhile policy suggestions or general ideas in this field, but the traditional media have allowed him to take a pass on any real scrutiny in this area, supposing that his credentials are beyond dispute. What a joke. But here is the point:
John McCain was depending upon this debate to bring his "strengths" back front and center. When he and his advisors realized that they would have their moment to shine overshadowed by economic disaster, they opted to try and put off that debate so that he could get the most bang for his withered buck.
Were there other calculations that helped him arrive at this miserable decision? Sure, but I think this was the core motive.
Do I have any expertise here or inside information? No. But call it a hunch...
So, should the debate go on? If possible, yes! Obama should do everything in his power to make it clear that he is ready to go, no matter what the theme, which I am certain he is. Any sign of hesitation here will deny Obama the opportunity for a moment of contrast on the intangible matter of "leadership style". If McCain wants to play politics deny him the opportunity to do so and rob him of a opportunity to profit from his accident. Play hard ball here, Obama.
If there is a consensus that the debate should go on and center on economic woes, Obama should enthusiastically embrace this proposition as well. Remember - this is a moment in which Obama needs to capitalize on his momentum, not hunker down on John McCain's terms .