For the past week, people have been coming to me asking if I had any data on the 2008 military vote. The questions were typical: Did the myth of overwhelming military support for Republicans bear out? Did Obama change that? Just who, exactly, do military communities support? And to what extent?
Unfortunately, I hadn’t really come up with much until today. But now, using general election data provided by the New York Times, I was able to determine that the military communities most affected by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan shifted significantly toward Barack Obama and the Democratic Party in 2008 when compared to the numbers from 2004.
Here’s how I did it: The New York Times put together a set of graphics that showed every county in the United States. Each county was color-coded to reveal the shift in that county’s vote--whether it went more Republican or more Democratic--from 2004 to 2008. They were done according to percentage changes, and shades of red symbolized movement toward McCain and the Republicans, while shades of blue represented a shift toward Obama and the Democrats.
After examining the New York Times data, I consulted the Los Angeles Times graphic that shows for whom each county in America voted--Obama or McCain.
With that information, I identified the county’s across the country that contain military bases housing America’s primary Army and Marine Corps ground combat forces--the very forces responsible for most of the fighting.
What I found was striking, though not all that surprising: Of the 15 military communities I looked at, 11 shifted toward the Democrats and Barack Obama, two had insufficient data to make a determination, and only two shifted toward John McCain and the Republicans.
That said, despite the overwhelming gains made by Obama and the Democrats, the Republican Party in some of these communities still enjoyed enough support to put McCain over the top in eight of the 15 communities. Six of the 15 military communities ultimately voted for Obama, and one community split its two counties between McCain and Obama. Here are the results:
Military Base: Camp Pendleton
Service: Marine Corps
County: San Diego
State: California
Major Combat Unit: 1st Marine Division
Shift from 2004: 10-20%
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: Barack Obama
Military Base: Camp LeJeune
Service: Marine Corps
County: Onslow
State: North Carolina
Major Combat Unit: 2nd Marine Division
Shift from 2004: 10-20%
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: John McCain
Military Base: Fort Benning
Service: Army
County: Muscogee
State: Georgia
Major Combat Units: 3rd Infantry Division, 3rd Ranger Battalion
Shift from 2004: 10-20%
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: Barack Obama
Military Base: Fort Bragg
Service: Army
County: Cumberland
State: North Carolina
Major Combat Units: 82nd Airborne Division, 3rd Special Forces Group, 7th Special Forces Group
Shift from 2004: 20%+
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: Barack Obama
Military Base: Fort Campbell
Service: Army
Counties: Christian and Montgomery
State: Kentucky and Tennessee
Major Combat Units: 101st Airborne Division, 5th Special Forces Group
Shift from 2004: 5-10% (KY) 10-20% (TN)
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: John McCain
Military Base: Fort Carson
Service: Army
County: El Paso
State: Colorado
Major Combat Units: 4th Infantry Division, 10th Special Forces Group
Shift from 2004: 10-20%
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: John McCain
Military Base: Fort Drum
Service: Army
County: Jefferson
State: New York
Major Combat Unit: 10th Mountain Division
Shift from 2004: 0-5%
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: John McCain
Military Base: Fort Hood
Service: Army
County: Bell
State: Texas
Major Combat Units: 4th Infantry Division, 1st Cavalry Division, 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment
Shift from 2004: 20%+
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: John McCain
Military Base: Fort Lewis
Service: Army
County: Pierce
State: Washington
Major Combat Units: 2nd Infantry Division, 2nd Ranger Battalion, 1st Special Forces Group
Shift from 2004: Insufficient Data
Shift in Favor of: Insufficient Data
Elected: Barack Obama
Military Base: Fort Polk
Service: Army
County: Vernon
State: Louisiana
Major Combat Unit: 10th Mountain Division
Shift from 2004: 5-10%
Shift in Favor of: Republicans/McCain
Elected: John McCain
Military Base: Fort Richardson
Service: Army
County: Anchorage
State: Alaska
Major Combat Unit: 25th Infantry Division
Shift from 2004: 10-20%
Shift in Favor of: Republicans/McCain
Elected: John McCain
Military Base: Fort Riley
Service: Army
Counties: Geary and Riley
State: Kansas
Major Combat Unit: 1st Infantry Division
Shift from 2004: 10-20% (both)
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: John McCain
Military Base: Fort Stewart
Service: Army
Counties: Liberty and Bryan
State: Georgia
Major Combat Units: 3rd Infantry Division, 1st Ranger Battalion
Shift from 2004: 20%+ (Liberty County) 10-20% (Bryan County)
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: Obama (Liberty County) McCain (Bryan County)
Military Base: Fort Wainwright
Service: Army
County: Fairbanks North Star Borough
State: Alaska
Major Combat Unit: 25th Infantry Division
Shift from 2004: Insufficient data
Shift in Favor of: Insufficient data
Elected: John McCain
Military Base: Schofield Barracks
Service: Army
County: Honolulu
State: Hawaii
Major Combat Unit: 25th Infantry Division
Shift from 2004: 20%+
Shift in Favor of: Democrats/Obama
Elected: Barack Obama
While this is certainly no academic study, we can still learn a lot from it. First, however, it should be noted that no conclusions can be derived from this data to support the idea that military communities are either conservative or liberal. What the data does show is that, in 2008, the communities most affected by repeated deployments of ground combat units overwhelmingly shifted their votes in favor of Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. Of the two that shifted toward John McCain and the Republicans, one of them--Fort Richardson--is located only a few miles from Sarah Palin’s hometown of Wasilla, Alaska.
It’s also worth pointing out that six and a half of the 15 communities experiencing significant shifts toward Obama still voted for McCain. To me, this comes across as some serious anger. We’re talking about communities that were obviously deeply conservative in 2004--like Fort Hood, TX and Fort Stewart, GA--which were able to shift more than 20 percentage points in favor of Barack Obama in 2008, and still lose to McCain in the end.
With these numbers, there can be no doubt that the military communities that have paid the most in time and lives lost over the past seven years have moved considerably away from both Bush policies and McCain’s attempts to extend them. While Republican support is still strong in these communities, the election of 2008 demonstrates that without comprehensive changes in the way the military is utilized by the government, that support is on a trend to evaporate. Combat-experienced military communities sent a message in 2008: Keep the year-long deployments going, keep the bellicose rhetoric up, and you will lose elections to Democrats.
Another way to look at this is that military communities like George W. Bush more than they like John McCain. And that’s bad.
I also find it slightly amusing to consider, then, that John McCain ran his entire campaign on the "success" of the "surge" in Iraq--a "fact" that meant we were "winning." And yet the military communities to whom he was directly speaking moved in the direction of Obama. Talk about out of touch.
Also available at VetVoice