Skip to main content

I happen to believe that Paul Krugman has been at least 90% correct through a several year period in which the majority of economists and pundits were 90% wrong. And while Krugman did spend much of that time--like Roubini, Stiglitz, Kuttner and others--shaking his head and sometimes channeling Keith Olbermann when he complained and exhorted and, yes, fumed at the "common wisdom", I NEVER considered him a shrill chicken little running around like he was about to have his head chopped off by a sharp piece of dark sky.

Which is one of the reasons why I find his most recent essay so compelling. The other is that it just is.

Of course I recommend you read the whole thing if you haven't already, but a few choice passages follow.

First, his introductory summation--

The short answer: to appease the centrists, a plan that was already too small and too focused on ineffective tax cuts has been made significantly smaller, and even more focused on tax cuts.

He's been making these two points all along, of course, and that was before the most recent "haircut." So now it comes with even greater emphasis and, dare I say it, "concern".

Why?

The real question now is whether Obama will be able to come back for more once it’s clear that the plan is way inadequate. My guess is no. This is really, really bad.

The centrists to whom Krugman refers remind me of the centrists here on DKos, for whom time does not seem to be of the essence and compromise is all well and good and to be expected. Neither of which could be further from the truth. Obama did not just enter "another" Presidency, and his turn at the wheel will not be measured like the rest, nor can it be.

Anyone who follows Krugman and the economists who come to similar conclusions knows this isn't just another economic shitstorm. The others were imposters. What's more, this one's occuring during two wars and, oh yeah, global warming. So the stakes are higher than we can rightly imagine. And while all reasonable people would like to give him the benefit of the doubt while he adjusts to the cockpit, it's just impractical. In this kind of crisis we need level-headedness, yes, but a ridiculously high appreciation for the true urgency of now. For good measure, we ought to assume the need for the urgency grows exponentially every day that these very large problems remain very largely unaddressed.

So while it is truly heartening to see the things that have been accomplished since inauguration day (excluding the tax problems, of course), they are, unfortunately, just the bongo intro to what must become a soaring anthem rocketing to the heavens and shooting for the moon. Yes, in fact, we need miracles.

We can rightly blame it on George Bush, but we can't pretend that now is the time to approach all things in moderation. As Krugman intimates, it's not time for "centrism." That time has come and gone. George Bush used up most of the fuel taking this ship out into the middle of the storm. We can't zig-zag back by some collegial, bi-partisan good enough for government work process of successive approximation. We head straight for shore by dead reckoning or we don't reach it. Period.

Like Krugman, I believe the economic downturn is going to be hard and long, that most people still have no idea what is coming, like, say, after the first week of the Iraq War. Well, like that war, the depression is going to be hell and the effects are going to last a generation or two. In fact, this nation may not ever completely recover. As Bush's own National Intelligence Committee reported this past fall, by 2025 the United States will be a "leader among equals", quite possibly still on a downward trajectory if the corporatists are allowed to keep siphoning off of the gains.

Oh, and don't forget global warming.

Originally posted to Words In Action on Sat Feb 07, 2009 at 06:48 PM PST.

Poll

Myself, I think

1%29 votes
1%34 votes
2%45 votes
8%154 votes
21%372 votes
55%983 votes
8%144 votes

| 1761 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences