Skip to main content

Chris Simcox, the founder of the Minutemen Civil Defense Corps, a vigilante group who organize "Border Watch"s in Arizona, has announced he will run against John McCain in the Republican Primary.
<align="center">t

This laughable campaign does show some vital signs however.
Learning from other failed Nativist campaigns like Rep. Tom Tancredo, Simcox vows he's not a "single issue candidate" and says he's confident he can raise $10-15 million from conservative Washington anti-immigrant groups.
It's no secret the Maricopa County (Phoenix) GOP has an strong distaste for McCain. Arizona's GOP base has significantly splintered over immigration. Just what you need to make the Arizona Senate Race interesting!
Can Simcox fracture the GOP enough to make Arizona a possible Democrat pickup?
At the least Simcox's heated rhetoric and substantial political baggage should make this interesting.

More below the fold


I'm truly excited.
What better way to destroy the Minutemen than to expose them on a national platform as a political opponent to John McCain?
Chris Simcox started the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps in 2004 with a website, a truck, and a few friends.  An out of work actor who was having marriage problems (amidst racism and molestation charges), he fled Los Angeles to Arizona's Cochise County shortly after 9/11/2001.  
In fact, Simcox according to the Arizona Star, has often mentioned that his fear of terrorism drove him to the border.  It was Simcox, along with minuteman filmmaker Chris Burgard, who propagated the myth that Al Qaeda terrorists were getting smuggled across the border.  Their proof?  
A Qur'an that they said they found near an illegal immigrant.  Border Patrol never substantiated this claim and in fact House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Silvestre Reyes moved for a perjury subpoena briefly against a former Border Patrol official for citing the Qur'an Minutemen incident during a House Subcommittee testimony.  The Qur'an on the Border story however continues to be quoted by a range of border extremists as an example.
Simcox did not invent the Minutemen, something similiar was founded by failed Congressional Candidate Jim Gilchrist earlier in 2003. Chris Simcox's similiarly named group however quickly gained national attention and volunteers began showing up.
In 2007 Simcox was sued by Jim Cambell, a donor to the MCDC after charges of fraud and mismanagment of funds came from within the organization. Campbell complained that he gave $100,000 to Simcox to build a fence along the border and but none of the money was ever accounted for.  Simcox, during the lawsuit, released his first and only public budget for the MCDC, where Simcox listed his salary as $90,000.
Campbell later dropped his civil case citing lawyer costs.
The mystery over Simcox's funding has helped to derail much of his support amongst his own organization. As the Arizona Star noted, many inside the Minutemen take issue with Simcox's alliance with Alan Keyes's Renew America.
The AMerican Prospect absolutely opens this guy up:
the group began recruiting new Minutemen around the country--everywhere from Illinois to Washington to New Hampshire. The donations began pouring in. Now thoroughly enmeshed in the [Alan] Keyes organization, all the MCDC donations flowed into a web of nearly a dozen organizations revolving around Declaration Alliance, including Diener Consultants; a Texas outfit called American Caging that acted as the escrow agent and comptroller for the operation; Renew America, a Keyes-run "grass-roots organization"; and a direct-mail company called Response Unlimited.

The association with Keyes' organizations raised hackles within MCDC ranks. Some of the Minutemen began exchanging e-mails denouncing the relationships, since Keyes and his groups were perceived within the ultra-right ranks as being "neoconservative" organizations whose interests were inimical to theirs. Gilchrist, who had washed his hands of the Keyes groups, sent out a bulletin making clear that his Minuteman Project no longer had any associations with Simcox and his outfit. The Washington Times reported on the dissent and quoted Keyes dismissing the MCDC's internal critics as anti-immigrant racists "and other unsavory fringe elements attempting to hijack the border security debate to further their individual agendas."

Simcox was undeterred. In April 2006, he hit on the idea of building a "state of the art" security fence along a section of the Arizona-Mexico border and told The Washington Times that he had more than $200,000 in donations. He described the project as one that would "feature separate, 14-foot-high fences on both sides of the border, separated by a roadway to allow the passage of U.S. Border Patrol vehicles, with surveillance cameras and motion sensors." It was this description that enticed Jim Campbell to pony up his $100,000. But there were problems, notably that there were few private landholders along the border willing to participate. The ranch owner who had agreed to a fence had no interest in an "Israeli style" security barrier; he only wanted a standard barbed-wire fence to keep out Mexican cattle. So that was what was built. The steel Campbell bought was to be used for a short section of "demonstration" fence at another ranch. Of the promised 70 miles of security fence, so far a length of only .7 miles has been erected. Much of Campbell's steel still lies in a pile, collecting Arizona dust.

... Certainly there was a significant gap between Simcox’s public claims of having raised $1.6 million for the fence, and what his financial disclosure forms show his organization actually spent on it. No one can say for sure because the MCDC won’t let anyone touch its books. But a look at the organization’s 2006 public filings indicates that, of all the money raised for the border fence, only a small amount (if any at all) went toward its construction. The forms for the Declaration Alliance—through whom all the border-fence donations were directed—show that it brought in nearly $5 million that year for all its programs. What percentage of that $5 million consisted of border-fence donations is unclear, but considering that the fence appeals began in May 2006 and have remained the MCDC’s (and Declaration Alliance’s) chief fundraising focus in the months since, it is likely that they provided at least a majority of that money. It also shows that $3.19 million went to the MCDC. But for what?

The Declaration Alliance largely spent the money on printing, consulting, and similar activities. The only indication on the form that any actual money went back to the MCDC in the field is $143,000 listed as "operational expenses," though this money reportedly was for MCDC border watches, not the fence project. If any of those millions of dollars actually went toward building a border fence, it’s difficult to ascertain where they are and how much was disbursed—though a look at the disclosure form for the Minuteman Foundation, the MCDC entity set up specifically to handle the fence project, shows a mere $87,500 in total revenues from donations for 2006. If that’s the actual revenue coming from that $3.19 million the Declaration Alliance says it spent on the MCDC—and you estimate that at least half of that is fence-related—then we’re talking about less than 6 percent coming back to build the fence.

In other words, the best rough estimate is that about 94 cents of every dollar Jim Campbell spent on the fence went toward printing, mailing, consulting, and the like. It’s no wonder members at the field level were seeing so little of the money that Simcox claimed to be rolling in.

Crooks and liars has a great one as well

Originally posted to LatinoDem on Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 11:24 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  if he loses (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kurt, antooo

    He could always get into winger porn, clearly he knows how to pose so as to get the Republican panties wet. Millions would pay to watch him teabag a Sarah Palin lookalike.

    Law is a light which in different countries attracts to it different species of blind insects. Nietzsche

    by Marcion on Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 11:34:11 AM PDT

  •  Do People REALLY Walk Around (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    beagledad, kurt, Exquisite

    With loaded handguns pointed directly at their Charlie Browns?  They don't have holster stores in Arizona?

    If spittle & tooth=vigor & youth Bill-O & Savage won't grow any older If wishes & dreams=bitches & beams We'll all live in skyscrapers bu

    by TooFolkGR on Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 11:37:17 AM PDT

    •  Yes. They do. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      TooFolkGR, kurt

      Read the "odd news" section of your favorite news website, and pretty regularly you'll see reports of people blowing off/blowing holes in various body parts as a result of badly placed unholstered weapons.  If I recall, the most frequent injury tends to be the less Darwinian butt wound, with only the very stupidest "victims" shooting themselves in the 'nads.

      "...we all of us, grave or light, get our thoughts entangled in metaphors, and act fatally on the strength of them."

      by beagledad on Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 11:45:11 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  cost the Giants the playoffs (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      TooFolkGR, kurt

      Don't you remember that football play who not only had it in his waistband, but it was the waistband of sweatpants, so the gun ended up sliding down while he was in a club and he shot himself while fishing for it.

      Law is a light which in different countries attracts to it different species of blind insects. Nietzsche

      by Marcion on Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 12:22:28 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  That young man needs to tuck in his shirt. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kurt

    And to stop posing like a 1970s porn star.

    "...we all of us, grave or light, get our thoughts entangled in metaphors, and act fatally on the strength of them."

    by beagledad on Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 11:40:04 AM PDT

  •  I hope this guy wins the nomination but (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    beagledad, kurt

    he just doesn't have a "senatorial" look about him.

    Maybe George Will was right about denim, or maybe it's the gun in the pants thing, it just doesn't seem like this picture will get you elected to the US Senate, just sayin.

    We shall overcome, someday. Yes we can.

    by Sam Wise Gingy on Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 11:42:32 AM PDT

    •  I'm not sure he has a homo sapiens look to him (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      kurt

      Healthy Minds, Healthy Bodies, discussing outdoor adventures Tuesdays at 5 PM PDT

      by indigoblueskies on Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 11:48:10 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I'm trying to think what committee assignments (0+ / 0-)

      he would get.  Floor Sweepings Disposal sub-sub-sub-sub committee?  Walking Around Wondering What's Really Going on sub-sub committee?  Making Crazy Shit Up and Lying About It subcommittee (you know, the one that used to be headed by Rick Santorum)?

      "...we all of us, grave or light, get our thoughts entangled in metaphors, and act fatally on the strength of them."

      by beagledad on Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 11:49:36 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Where can I get me one of those dope (0+ / 0-)

    American Flag baseball caps? And why does this scary ass dude have a sad puppy dog look on his face? Don't neo-cons hate signs of weakness? Maybe that handgun pointed directly at his crotch is the only think keeping him from getting his ass kicked. Survival of the whitest.

    "cuz I can be your daddy be your rock an rolla, and you can be my sugar be my cherry cola!"

    by The Return Of G0nzo on Sat Apr 25, 2009 at 10:49:51 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site