Skip to main content

I get that people all across America, and especially in Washington, are currently involved in a contentious debate about universal health care. I also get that one side of the argument is using smear tactics and making things up to try to kill a bill which their bank-rollers don't want to see passed. But, really, I'm still astonished to see that same side of the debate attacking the Department of Veterans Affairs.

It's pretty transparent what is happening here. Proponents of a public option can point to two successful implementations of government health care: MediCare, and the VHA. Rather than supporting their point of view on its own merits (assuming it has any), opponents are trying to tear down the reputations of those services, which consistently get high marks from those who use them.

That's why we saw this yesterday:

If President Obama wants to better understand why America's
discomfort with end-of-life discussions threatens to derail his health-care
reform, he might begin with his own Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). He
will quickly discover how government bureaucrats are greasing the slippery
slope that can start with cost containment but quickly become a systematic
denial of care.

Last year, bureaucrats at the VA's National Center for Ethics in Health Care
advocated a 52-page end-of-life planning document, "Your Life, Your
Choices." It was first published in 1997 and later promoted as the VA's
preferred living will throughout its vast network of hospitals and nursing
homes. After the Bush White House took a look at how this document was
treating complex health and moral issues, the VA suspended its use.
Unfortunately, under President Obama, the VA has now resuscitated "Your
Life, Your Choices."

Of course, as we've been covering at VetVoice.com, and first reported at Huffington, this is a bunch of garbage from a guy who was trying to push his own document on the VHA:

In light of the absolutely ridiculous argument Towey makes in
his op-ed, I'd like to point out something Towey isn't telling you.  In
1996, Towey founded an organization known as "Aging with Dignity" which
still exists today. The following year, Aging with Dignity released a
document titled "Five Wishes". Five wishes is the same type of document as
the VA's "Your Life, Your Choices", only 41 pages shorter and not legally
sound as a living will in 10 states.

That's right. All you need, according to Jim Towey, to make your end of life
decisions is five questions and twelve pages,  because wrestling over end of
life shouldn't take up more than two minutes of your time. That is, if you
are lucky enough to live in one of the 40 states in which it is acceptable.
Here is something else that Jim Towey isn't telling you: He wants to kill
the "Your Life, Your Choices" pamphlet because he has been trying to sell
his own "Five Questions" document to the VA for use in VHA medical
centers.

Which leads me to the point of this post. Senator Arlen Specter has personally questioned
why VoteVets.org PAC endorsed his opponent in the Democratic primary, Admiral (Ret.) and Congressman Joe Sestak. This illustrates exactly why the organization made their
endorsement:

Sen. Arlen Specter on Sunday called for hearings to scrutinize a
guide for veterans' end-of-life care which one former Bush official says
sends a "hurry-up-and-die" message to injured troops.
The guide, called "Your Life, Your Choices," was suspended under the Bush
administration but has been revived under the current Department of Veterans
Affairs.

Rather than seeing the argument for what it is, a reactionary attempt to make a partisan argument against the effectiveness of a government agency that consistently receives high approval ratings from those it serves, Specter instead called for tax payer dollars and the time of Congress to be spent on hearings over a pamphlet which is still being reviewed, is not mandatory for use by VHA physicians, and is no where near the "hurry-up-and-die" document which its slanderers have purported it to be.

Enjoy the primary, Arlen.

Originally posted to Richard Smith on Mon Aug 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site