after an entertaining and explosive summer opening at the top of the mainstream headlines (thanks, lou!), patriotic, natural-born, constitutionally concerned and totally-not-racist birthers were relegated to the back bench while their spiritual soulmates, the pistol-packing, tree-of-liberty-watering teabaggers, closed out the season at the capital grounds, on center stage in the never-ending right-wing migraine battering the nation's consciousness.
while it doesn't yet look like the birthers will come roaring back into the fall with anything near the fanfare of summer, this week marked a few not-totally-imaginary birfer events worth noting.
1) rhodes going nowhere
| tireless usurper-hunting dentist-lawyer-realtor "our lady of liberty" and reigning "queen bee" of birfistan orly taitz was awarded another valuable teachable moment in her second case involving a military serviceperson seeking proof of the kenyan's presidential bona fides: | |
[judge clay] land also put attorney orly taitz, who represents capt. connie rhodes and is a leader in the national "birther" movement, on notice by stating that she could face sanctions if she ever files a similar "frivolous" lawsuit in his court.
"(rhodes) has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that president obama is ineligible to serve as president of the united states," land states in his order. "instead, she uses her complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the president is ‘an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.'"
... "it would appear that ample opportunity [during the primary and general election campaigns] existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the president was not eligible for the office he sought," land says.
| and to put a fine pin-point on it: | |
finally, in a remarkable shifting of the traditional legal burden of proof, plaintiff unashamedly alleges that defendant has the burden to prove his "natural born" status. ... thus, plaintiff's counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the president of the united states, to "prove his innocence" to "charges" that are based upon conjecture and speculation. any middle school civics student would readily recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental principles upon which our country was founded in order to purportedly "protect and preserve" those very principles.
somebody should consider trying [the judge] for treason and aiding and abetting this massive fraud known as barack hussein obama.
... this is so outrageous what this judge did — it goes in the face of law and order ... not every judge is as corrupt as judge land. some judges believe in the constitution. and some judges believe in the rule of law.
| fasten your seat-belts, folks! the waaaahmbulance has left the station!
so no huge surprises in her motion for a new hearing (whose leaden prose, a departure from her high-octane ramblings, means orly's finally getting some much-needed assistance in the writing dept.): | |
plaintiff avers that there is increasing evidence that the united states district courts in the 11th circuit are subject to political pressure, external control, and, mostly likely, subservience to the same illegitimate chain of command which plaintiff has previously protested in this case, except that the de facto president is not even nominally the commander-in-chief of the article III judiciary.
| so orly shouldn't be hugely surprised with the treasonous response from the treasonous usurper-slurper: | |
"it was deja vu all over again."
... if counsel had carefully read the court's order ... competent counsel would have understood ...
... although the first amendment may allow plaintiff’s counsel to make these wild accusations on her blog or in her press conferences, the federal courts are reserved for hearing genuine legal disputes and not as a platform for political rhetoric that is disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action.
... the court finds plaintiff's motion for stay of deployment (doc. 15) to be frivolous. therefore, it is denied. the court notifies plaintiff's counsel, orly taitz, that it is contemplating a monetary penalty of $10,000.00 to be imposed upon her, as a sanction for her misconduct. ms. taitz shall file her response within fourteen days of today’s order showing why this sanction should not be imposed.
| oww-itch!!! that's gonna leave a mark.
which leaves no huge surprises left coming from the man-on-the-street freeperville: | |
this judge needs to be removed for incompetence, and for unlawfully threatening a lawyer for representing a legitimate case....there is no way that this case could be determined "frivolous" without discovery....
also, there is another federal court that has allowed the case to proceed....and the longer that case is allowed to proceed....those rulings will take precedence over the loony rantings of this judge land.
the judge says he was elected so he's qualified. what happened to my america?
| i know some of you birfers are older than even john mccain, but those witch trials ended years ago ... | |
this judge has gonads the size of a dust mite.
lemme guess. this judge was a democrat appointee?
NOPE not by clinton!
on the recommendation of us congressman saxby chambliss, land was NOMINATED BY PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH on september 21, 2001 ...
everyone keeps messing up by filing this things in liberal controlled areas. if you want to get results, go file it in the most conservative area of the us.
| ♫ a-gotta get yourself a bargain, son ... don't be sold on the very first one ... my mama told me ... you better shop around! a-whoa-yeah ...♫ | |
since the judges want more evidence, we will have to commit the crime of breaking and entering. what else can be done when a fraud suspect will not reveal the documents?
| actually, there is more birfers could do, from a fanboy mash note on orly's own site (which, as a frighteningly accurate reflection of her mental state, is an html-challenged, god-awful, malware-infested mess; you have been forewarned): | |
i have challanged judge land to a round of "fist a cuff's" in the couthouse square, via e-mail... i told him that i might possibly beat some sense into him....the man has insulted Me,U and 1/2 the Citizenry of the United States, by tossing ur case and calling it "frivolous"....no such thing as a stupid question, and i want to know who or what this thing in the whitehouse is.... i will let u know what judge land's response is...
| orly's devoted and admittedly "challanged" winged monkeys appear set to take flight — provided the u.s. marshals service doesn't clip their wings first.
meanwhile, back in freeperville: | |
wasn't she quoted a while ago as saying she could get obama out of office in like 30 days or something?
i see things are working out well for her.........(orly t)
judge land elected to discuss what he feels is the paucity of evidence presented to show the obama is inelligible, not enough evidence to show the likelihood of a taitz win on the merits — BUT HE ADDRESSED THE MERITS!!!
this means, if anything, that DISCOVERY IS ESSENTIAL (motions to produce documentation against team obama — birth records, college records, passport records etc.). judge land is saying that based on what orly has produced, the case is frivolous BASED ON THOSE FACTS. orly should take this landmark precedent of the court addressing those facts and merits TO SHOW PRECISELY WHY DISCOVERY BEING MANDATED IS ABSOULTELY ESSENTIAL (and once there IS discovery, obama will fall).
stated another way, the precedent has been established to address the merits and the facts of obama's eligibility; more than just dismissal on procedural or standing grounds.
THIS IS A HUGE WIN (but judge land does it in a way to protect himself from the obamabots by his clobbering of taitz).
| bingo! once orly gets enough evidence to prove her case, she wins! it's brilliant, really! she just needs to make that obvious to the judge ... | |
2) runaway jury duty
| when last we heard from the dedicated patriots organizing the national citizens' american grand super jury, they had spent america's birthday on a two-day walking tour of the nation's capital, delivering — to lawmakers and civil servants and their dogs — their historic "presentments" charging fraud and treason against the usurper. surely everyone remembers the crickets chirping, if nothing else.
in an unusual move, the citizen jurors decided to petition the courts to convene a real grand jury (which of course in no way invalidates their claim that their "roll your own" juries are more than lynch mob kabuki theater)
recognizing the national import of the charges, the courts did not keep its concerned citizens waiting long for their ruling: | |
09/10/2009 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 1 PETITION FOR THE CONVENING OF A FEDERAL GRAND JURY by PATRIOT’S HEART MEDIA NETWORK, INC., CARL SWENSSON, ROBERT DEBEAUX, ROBERT D. PINKSTAFF, PENNY KELSO. petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. signed by chief judge royce c. lamberth on 9/10/2009. (zkb) (entered: 09/11/2009)
... plaintiffs who only alleges "a generally available grievance about government — claiming only harm to his and every citizen's interest in proper application of the constitution and laws, and seeking relief that no more directly and tangibly benefits him than it does the public at large — does not state an article iii case or controversy." id. at 573-74.
it follows, and the supreme court has repeatedly held, that an individual has no judicially cognizable interest in the criminal prosecution or non-prosecution of another person. ... ("[t]he question of whether and when prosecution to instituted is within the discretion of the attorney general."). furthermore, this principle has been applied to hold that a party lacks standing to compel the impaneling of a grand jury. ... since this is precisely the relief that petitioners seek, they do not have standing. accordingly, their petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
| ok, cue the gnashing and the caterwauling ... | |
submit the petition again! only this time put the petition under the constitutional title of PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE! also make it a class action Petition for Redress of Grievances. the injury is the threat to this nations sovereignty which induces injury to all Citizens of the United States of America!
| ... because the only thing wrong with our manifesto was TEH TITLE WASN'T ALL CAPS!!! | |
i am disappointed in judge lamberth. in the second paragraph of his opinion, he shows blatant bias in his statement that PHN wanted a grand jury to "indict" obama on the charge of forgery, etc. NO. i read the entire 181 pages, which presented evidence to the judge of criminal wrongdoing within the government. it asked the judge to convene a grand jury and have the members examine the evidence for themselves. the petition never suggested that a grand jury automatically indict obama.
apparently, despite his military service, judge lamberth does not have the guts to look at the evidence and consider what should be done to correct the terrible deception forced upon the american people. he simply falls back on the issue of "standing," like all of the other cowardly judges across the country.
it looks as if judge david o. carter has a lot more integrity than judge lamberth. the PHN filing was not a lawsuit and therefore shouldn't be treated like one. it was a report of credible evidence that a crime had been committed and a request that the judge look into it. evidently that is something he doesn't have the conscience to do.
| we wanted him to read the whole thing first -- and then indict the usurper!!! | |
obama is going to be ferreted out sooner or later, probably sooner than he thinks. its just a matter of time until all the dots, including those with acorn are connected. he will be accused of high treason along with about 100 other things!
| you'll wake me up when that happens, right? i'd sure hate to miss all the fun. | |
3) can i haz a witness?
i have tried to stay neutral in the cases of orly taitz and have even tolerated the attacks from her and her supporters. i will no longer. orly taitz needs to be held accountable and responsible for her actions and her actions need to be made public.
...later today i will be faxing to the united states district court in santa ana, california as well as to the u.s. attorney's office an affidavit informing judge carter that on september 7, 2009 orly taitz did knowingly and intentionally ask me to appear before his court on september 8, 2009 and give knowingly false testimony for the purpose of obtaining "expedited discovery," and to gain publicity for my book.
i have made it clear from my first going public on youtube january 17, 2008 that i will stand by the truth and would not allow anyone to misrepresent my statements nor would i be dishonest in any way. orly taitz as an officer of the court engaged in behavior that if allowed to go unquestioned will harm any and all valid claims made on barack obama's eligibility now or in the future. in the words of an orly taitz supporter, "she can't lie and ask others to lie at the same time accusing obama of lying. lets get to the truth but we have to be honest in doing so."
im sorry everyone but, i cannot work with orly taitz any longer. she wants me to lie under oath.
... orly taitz does not feel it is important to investigate further into any documents that backup obama's claim to hawaiian birth. she says that she does not have the money to do so however, her legal team is free to pay their own way. her whole legal team works for free and pays their own expenses. she had the nerve to tell me to get a job when i requested that she send me her another of her free legal team to sacramento, ca to investigate the birth announcenment of obama. all this after she tells the court that she fears for my life. i've been running around the world, blowing through thousands of dollars while this lady has been selling her body to legal team members rather than cough up expenses. she wont pay for anything unless i testify to her version of the STORY. no thanks orly, i'll find my own my home. keep your plane ticket.
| i guess not getting paid, especially after being repeatedly shut down by ebay, gave smith a new purpose in life.
so let's have a big round of applause for both sinclair and smith, this month's big winners of birfistan's "hero to zero" grand prize: | |
so larry sinclair can also be bought off. whatta nutjob.
larry sinclair in a bind. again.
not a bind, just a purse fight. that’s what fags do best.
smith tried originally to sell this "kenyan bc" on ebay for $1 million. smith is a career scam artist with a lengthy criminal record of fraud-related convictions.
ah yes, the oh so honorable mister smith. i wonder, how mush of soros's money will smith get to live off of before some disgruntled person he's cheated puts an end ot his sorry life? this case looks like it will get to sworn testimony and smith can't stand the heat.
this lady has been selling her body to legal team members
that doesn't paint a pretty picture.
eurrrrrghhhhhh.
i am starting to come to the painful realisation that orly is the star of a false-flag operation to discredit and distract the birther movement. the incompetence, the poor interview performance, the grandiose courtroom-inappropriate rhetoric, and now this. would russia have an interest in screwing up our republic this way? i think so.
i would suggest putting our support behind another attorney persuing this, but i can't for the life of me remember who they are ... guess that's a sign that this ploy worked :-(.
| but in the skies above birfistan, every cloud has a silver lining: | |
the genuineness of the smith exhibit is not the issue. getting to discovery through the ‘sufficient doubt' is the issue, and even a good forgery will get that done. you see, in order for the DOJ lawyers to debunk smith's exhibit, they will have to be into trial mode! bwahahahahahaha ... your messiah is doomed, i say D O O M E D!