Can this be right? Orly is boasting about it at her virus ridden site (www.orlytaitz.com - don't go there!).
Per Orly:
ACTUAL ORDER FROM JUDGE CARTER:MY CASE BARNETT ET AL V OBAMA ET AL IS GOING TO TRIAL, DATES ARE FINAL, JANUARY 26 IS THE DATE FOR THE JURY TRIAL
UPDATE Never mind. The attorneys have weighed in. This order just finalizes the schedule in case there is a trial. Don't tell the Freepers though, they're busy celebrating their victory.
LINK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date October 5, 2009
Title CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET AL. V. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL.
Present: The Honorable David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge
Kristee Hopkins
Deputy Clerk
Debbie Gale
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
N/A
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Orly Taitz
Gary Kreep
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
David DeJute, AUSA
Roger West, AUSA
Proceedings:
- MOTION BY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS CASE
- SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken under submission.
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final.
Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
3
: 21
01
Initials of Preparer kh
Some background on the case (one of many - this is not the Georgia case where Orly has been battling Judge Land with a flurry of personal accusations, which so far have resulted in the Judge threatening her with a $10,000 fine).
http://www.wavenewspapers.com/...
JUDGE HEARS ARGUMENTS IN CHALLENGE TO OBAMA BIRTH STATUS
By WIRE SERVICES
Story Published: Oct 5, 2009 at 5:29 PM PDT
SANTA ANA — Lawyers seeking President Barack Obama’s removal from office, claiming he was not born in the United States, took their case Monday to the Santa Ana courtroom of U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter
==snip==
The day started with Carter denying Kreep’s motion to sever his case from Taitz’s. Kreep represents Wiley Drake, who ran for vice president under the American Independent Party, and Markham Robinson, the chairman of the American Independent Party.
Taitz represents Capt. Pamela Barnett and other military officers who question orders from the commander in chief. She has done the same elsewhere in the country and has failed, most recently in a Georgia court where U.S. District Court Judge Clay Land rejected the lawsuit Taitz filed on behalf of Capt. Connie Rhodes, a physician who was fighting her assignment to Iraq.
In his motion to sever their cases, Kreep said, “Dr. Taitz has filed increasingly convoluted pleadings that do not adequately address the injury of plaintiffs, nor do anything but confuse the issues presented.”
Department of Justice attorneys Roger West and David DeJute argued that only Congress can remove a president through impeachment and that the only way the courts get involved is having the chief justice of the Supreme Court preside over the impeachment trial.
Otherwise, the country would be “crippled” if a lone judge could undo an election, West said.
Carter quizzed Taitz as to why she waited until Inauguration Day to file her lawsuit when it was too late to have the Electoral College go against the popular vote. Taitz said problems she had with her clients and with Kreep made it impossible for her to file sooner.
WTF? Carter's going to hear the case? O RLY? WHY? I'll wait patiently for the DK attorneys to weigh in and explain this to me.
Relevant documents here.
UPDATE
..............ME.......................................ATTORNEYS.....