Skip to main content

When the klaxon blares in the middle of the night, it seems as if your heart actually stops for a few seconds.  Then the lights come on bright, crews jump into their flight suits and combat boots, rush to the flight line, flash the appropriate security code, climb up the crew ladder, jump into their seats, decode the message and wait.

Is it an exercise? Or could it be the real thing, to launch a nuclear attack against the USSR?  These are my memories of serving as a KC-135 copilot in 1983.

Many people today vaguely remember those days of the Cold War, when we had thousands of nuclear warheads aimed at the Soviet Union, and they had thousands aimed at us. Now, when I hear that we have reached yet another step toward nuclear disarmament and accountability, I am relieved.

The 10-year Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) moves us toward our goal of reducing the threat of nuclear war and strengthens our hand when facing the increasing threat of nuclear terrorism from rogue countries.

According to the Washington Post, here’s how these complex discussions have progressed:

On the American side, negotiators were aware that any significant limits on verification or the U.S. missile shield would be unacceptable to Senate Republicans and the Pentagon. The U.S. side appears to have largely won the battle over missile defense, with a mention of it in the treaty's preamble but no new limits imposed on the American system, officials said.

American officials said President Obama and Medvedev talked 10 times on the phone and five times in person throughout the past year, often at times when the negotiations in Geneva had bogged down.

The White House official said the turning point came in a testy conversation between President Obama and Medvedev in late February.

"The Russians were pushing for constraints on missile defense to be incorporated into the treaty. The president said that was simply unacceptable," the official said.

President Obama indicated he was willing to walk away from the treaty, the official said, "That was the breaking point."

He and Medvedev finally agreed on most of the major issues: They would cut deployed warheads to 1,550 per side, down from the current limit of 2,200. They would cut deployed heavy bombers and missiles to 700 each. They would conduct 18 inspections a year, up from 10 originally proposed by Moscow.

This START agreement builds on START I that was passed in the Senate on October 1, 1992, with a huge bipartisan agreement of 93-6.

However, there are already rumors that some members of our U.S. Senate will make this agreement a partisan battle over the national security issue that it is and should be viewed as.

There is way too much partisanship in Washington, but when it comes to national security, we must all work together to ensure the safety of all Americans.

Not only does this treaty continue the combined effort of the United States and Russia to reduce and account for current nuclear weapon arsenals, it sets the world stage for accountability for nuclear weapons development.

We all know the threat that Iran continues to proclaim as far as nuclear weapons development.  We must be on strong ground when we demand the ability to inspect and verify their program.  Our best option is to live by what we expect others to adhere to.  America should always lead by example in the challenging world of nuclear accountability.

A solid front by both the United States and Russia when approaching Iran on these issues will increase our authority.  With the ever-increasing threats of nuclear terrorism, we need to increase our allies and isolate those that may want to harm us.

I proudly served as a copilot on the KC-135 that was instrumental in providing the needed fuel reserves for the nuclear-laden B-52s so that they could reach their targets.  I remember the morning briefings on how few precious minutes we had to launch before the Soviet submarine missiles hit our base.  This is why I demand that on this issue, we put our country ahead of our politics and support this new START treaty.

Originally posted to Jane Dyer on Mon Apr 05, 2010 at 06:40 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site