Skip to main content

Yesterday, the U.S. Senate approved $600 million in funding for additional security measures along the border with Mexico, including new technology, personnel, and even a couple unmanned predator drones (feel safer yet?). I blogged about the proposal yesterday in "Democrats Bow to Republican Border Security Lies, Spend $600 Million On Non-Solutions."

This latest development represents not a reasoned response to some massive crime increase on our Southern border (thank goodness) but election year politics at their worst. Senate Democrats and Republicans both know that the only route to true border security is real, comprehensive immigration reform.

According to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America’s Voice:

Congress has now delivered on the latest request for extra funds and personnel that the ‘border security first’ crowd, such as Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ), have been advocating for.  Will these former champions of comprehensive immigration reform keep moving the security goalposts and sticking with their ‘border first’ talking points?  Or will they recognize that Republican primaries will soon be over and the time is right to deliver an actual, lasting solution to fix the broken immigration system?

Here's hoping that's the case. If not, Senate Democrats have handed certain Arizona Republicans just what they were looking for: validation for their absurd claims about crime and illegal immigration to justify blocking real, comprehensive immigration reform.

As Sam Seder argues, that's BS (WARNING- language may not be suitable for work):

(h/t John Aravosis, AMERICABlog).

Edward Alden, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, has argued that "it's time for lawmakers to reconsider what they'd like to see  happening in the region." According to Alden:

"Border security has become the most overused, and least understood,  concept in the struggle over what to do about our broken immigration  system," he said. "While an election year may not be the best time, the  United States finally needs an honest debate over what it means to  secure the country's borders."

Let's face it. The border debate has rarely been about facts – border spending and security have dramatically increased in recent years and crime rates in border cities and states such as Arizona have actually declined, despite the incendiary rhetoric.  Instead, the border has become a proxy for heated political battles, including John McCain’s primary challenge from anti-immigrant zealot J.D. Hayworth. Not to mention Democrats’ misplaced race to catch up with hardline  Republican rhetoric on immigration, instead of countering it with the facts and steadfastly fighting for the real solutions that American voters back in poll after poll.

So where are we now?

For months, Republicans have been saying "border security first"  while blocking any possible action on comprehensive immigration reform –  the best way to secure the border and the only way to actually repair  our broken immigration system.  While many Democrats have been calling  for a reasoned approach, Senate Democrats caved to misplaced political  fears yesterday. Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and the Democratic co-sponsors of the bill should know better. Relentless bleating about "Border security first" is a Republican campaign slogan, not an immigration policy.

Senators on both sides of the aisle need to drop the slogans, get  past the wedge politics, and finally work together to pass what the  American people want: comprehensive, pragmatic reforms that turn a  chaotic immigration system into a legal, just, and humane one. Not to  mention raising billions in tax revenue from newly-legalized workers instead of throwing hundreds of  millions at unmanned predator drones to patrol an already-heavily  guarded border.

In the meantime, there are many ways that Senators can move to fix our broken immigration system immediately.  Senate leadership should figure out a path forward on immigration that cuts through the ugly rhetoric on immigration instead of embracing it.

Cross-Posted at America's Voice.

Originally posted to AmericasVoice on Fri Aug 06, 2010 at 01:10 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  what do you think? (0+ / 0-)

    justified?

    BS?

    in-between?

    •  The Lame Duck Session (0+ / 0-)

      If the Democratic Congress does not pass Comprehensive Immigration Reform during the upcoming Lame Duck Session, then it will have failed us miserably once again, and particularly the Senate. Just how much rank disappointment are we expected to suffer at the unclean hands of the Democratic Congress?  

  •  Profound Problems (0+ / 0-)

    First of all, Democrats in Congress have to get re-elected.  Nobody can really do that without bowing to what is easy and understandable, as repeated ad infinitum by the media.  

    More sophisticated approaches have to either wait, or become victim to the Catch 22 of it:  what the public doesn't understand it won't support.  Leaders ought to be taking the intitiative to educate the public so that the whole field of effort can move forward.  But conventional wisdom is that if you try to educate the public, you get perceived as being out of step.  

    Look, the reason that this issue is where it is has to do with decades of consistent efforts by multinational business with trillions of dollars worth of investments south of the border.  That is a factor that is hidden in plain sight.

    Why doesn't the media look at that?  Because the media is owned by the same interests and because American consumerism is the basis for the profit that comes from all that investment.  All advertising is based on there being cheap bananas available to people who don't know where they come from and don't want to know.  

    Democrats and progressives are being played.  The only debate grounds for this whole large issue is on terms dictated by the army of advertising and PR agents that this investment is protected by.

    Not a thing will get accomplished until the blinders come off, and the debate about how to work with the OAS states in order to create better economic equity for our brothers and sisters and cousins south of the border - as well as north.  

    Until then, this will continue to be just a gigantic game of "ignore the little man behind the curtain."

    hope that the idiots who have no constructive and creative solutions but only look to tear down will not win the day.

    by Stuart Heady on Fri Aug 06, 2010 at 01:21:36 PM PDT

  •  Ok... (0+ / 0-)

    So predator drones won't work...what about sharks with lasers on their heads? See, I'm always thinking.

    Is that a real poncho, or is that a Sears' poncho? - Frank Zappa

    by JoesGarage on Fri Aug 06, 2010 at 02:12:35 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site