Skip to main content

Hours before the Labor Day weekend, President Obama decided that he would refuse to do what the law, science, and the public interest require: enforce the Clean Air Act to reduce utility and other polluter emissions that cause illness and death for thousands of Americans each year.  He overruled his own EPA, and killed a life-saving, job-creating rule necessary to reduce ground-level ozone pollution that causes thousands of premature deaths.  Apart from the rash abandonment of effective environmental and public health law enforcement, Obama’s action gratuitously promotes the false dogma that environmental regulation costs jobs.  Just the opposite is true.

The “job-killing regulation” lie is an old one, and most people know it. Apart from the perverse logic in purporting to act to preserve some jobs at the price of thousands of lives and thousands of new cases of asthma in children, actually complying with the Clean Air Act and other environmental protections create jobs.  After all, while polluters might have more compliance costs, those "costs" are paid to innovative companies and people that create the solutions to comply with the law and protect American lives.

For example, when the Environmental Protection Agency first proposed amendments to the Clean Air Act aimed at reducing acid rain caused by power plant emissions, the electric utility industry warned that they would cost $7.5 billion and tens of thousands of jobs. But the cost of the program has been closer to $1 billion, said Dallas Burtraw, an economist at Resources for the Future, a nonprofit research group on the environment. And the E.P.A., in a paper published this year, cited studies showing that the law had been a modest net creator of jobs through industry spending on technology to comply with it.

New York Times, September 5, 2011

With this retreat on the Clean Air Act, the White House blew another opportunity to lead rather than crouch.  President Obama could have stood up for the American people and innovative businesses rather than do the bidding of the most inefficient, dangerous corporate polluters. He could have pushed ahead with the smog rules that EPA had developed so well and explained why he was doing so in his “jobs speech” this week. He could have told the American people the truth—we can handle it -- about the bogus, corporate-funded “job-killing regulation” campaign that coal, oil and other global corporations are spreading throughout the land.

It may be that Obama got weak-kneed on the smog rule because of fear of billions of dollars in potential political spending in 2012 from the oil, coal, and utility corporations. For good reasons, this kind of corporate spending was illegal for a century before the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision.  Now “corporate free speech” outweighs the lives, jobs and health of the people who would have benefited from enforcing the Clean Air Act  in a way that might actually protect clean air.

I think we’ll continue to see the effect of Citizens United on jobs, and we will not see a return of an innovative, dynamic American economy that works for Americans until the case is overturned. The Supreme Court’s elimination of the last restraint on corporate power - - a modest limitation on spending in elections - - is likely to be the end game of the transformation of our economy into one where only a few people, rather than most people, have a shot to prosper.

In the corporatist era, it is not just regulation in the public interest that is disappearing. Good wages and benefits like health care or pensions are now costs to be reduced, avoided, or eliminated altogether, rather than good things to which we should aspire.

On this Labor Day, it may be good to recall that we used to think that higher wages with more benefits for working people was a worthy goal, rather than a problem to overcome so corporations can be more competitive.

If we accept the false metaphor in Citizens United of corporate money as a “voice,” and the bogus idea that big corporations are no more of a threat to our political life than wealthy people, there is a good chance we will complete the transition of America to a state of crony capitalism, where corporate money distorts policies, corrupts markets to favor the inefficient, dirty and well-connected, rather than the good, clean and innovative business. And good, well-paying jobs will be as hard to find as clean air.

Cross-posted at www.jeff-clements.com

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site