Skip to main content

This video first before I get into the meat of the article:

The 99% seem to have finally evoked emotion from Progressives.  Seven Progressive House candidates for 2012 confronted John Boehner's office and handing in Petitions urging the Speaker to support and move to pass the President's Job Bill:

This diary is about the agenda of the ALEC fronted "Cabal" and the mechanics of how they are able to accomplish so much in the face of timid Progressive opposition.  I use the term "timid" here not to accuse Progressives of lacking the courage to fight ALEC and the cabal, rather as a description of lacking courage to effectively come together to coordinate a proper defense or any offense to counter ALEC and their pro-corporate Conservative initiatives.

Time and again I - and other Kossacks - have written about the Cabal's coordination and ability to bring support for their initiatives from the entire Conservative Right.  As the following clearly shows us, on each important pro-corporate, free-market issue developed within ALEC's Task Forces, Koch money and influence is used to bring support from every corner of Conservativedum (pun intentional); the Lame Stream Media, Institutes, Organizations, lobbyists, lawmakers, special interest publications and groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce  

This diary uses a transcript of a hearing held in 2005 in Connecticut before a committee examining various proposed state bills to get across my point.  I find this incident and what has followed since 2005 very descriptive of how ALEC, their Conservative affiliates, individuals and others help advance the pro-corporate legislation put forth by ALEC.  This shows the effort put into just one of ALEC’s thousands of bills spreading like a disease across America over the past 38 years.

This example demonstrates how cohesively the cabal is and their efforts coordinated to achieve the end goal – passage of pro-corporate favored/written ALEC legislation  and  in effect, getting their way.  It also shows how the various organizations, media and lawmakers work closely to support ALEC’s efforts – and why Progressive Democrats are unable to compete against them or defeat their efforts outright. As I said above, ALEC and the Koch funded cabal bring all of their “tools” to bear when advancing a piece of ALEC’s legislation.  Since 2005 this same legislation has been making its way state by state across the U.S.  When defeated (like it was in Connecticut in 2004) they are patient, revisit the legislation, amend, tweak or revise it then re-propose it the following year and if necessary the next and next until passed.  As you read this, keep in mind that this is an initiative begun by ALEC as far back as 2004 and is still being pursued vigorously.  What happened in Connecticut in 2005 should be defined as lobbying – in the extreme – yet ALEC and their proponents continue to argue what they are doing is “educating” lawmakers on how to write legislation…

In 2011 ALEC is still pursuing this legislation nationwide: calling it their “Private Attorney Retention Sunshine Act” which they publicized in 2007 A Current New Mexico bill mirroring this earlier Connecticut legislation is titled: “TRANSPARENCY IN PRIVATE ATTORNEY CONTINGENCY CONTRACTS ACT”, in Missouri This Private Attorney Retention Sunshine Act is also independently supported by the U.S. Chamber’s  Institute for Legal Reform: Heartland Institute: and when vetoed by Oklahoma’s Governor in 2009, the Wall Street Journal reported negatively upon the Governor’s decision and in support of the legislation:  Just this month “The Blaze” published an article about ALEC’s  Private Attorney Retention Sunshine Act: , as did the Manhattan Institute:

The below transcript is of a hearing on just one of the ALEC bills being pursued in Connecticut in 2005, HB 5143, “Legislation To Establish Oversight Process For State Legal Expenses”.  ALEC is represented at the Connecticut hearing by Mark Behrens from Shook, Hardy and Bacon.  Behrens is lobbying for this ALEC legislation sponsored/presented by Representative John Harkins (R)who served as ALEC’s State Chairman in Connecticut:

This clearly shows several things to us;  1) ALEC’s pro-corporate written legislation is disseminated and introduced to individual states by ALEC’s state chairmen as called for under their charter (Article X – 10.03);

Section 10.03 - Duties:"State Chairman duties shall include recruiting new members, working to ensure introduction of model legislation..."
2) once introduced, ALEC sends their lobbyists (disguised as “counsel”) to various states where passage is questionable or has been defeated previously.  He/they then lend support for the legislation and present decision swaying arguments in support of their legislation, and; 3) Behrens is not honest and open in those instances when he attends such hearings on behalf of ALEC and their legislation.

First, Behrens failed to advise the committee that he was also registered as a lobbyist for Shook, Hardy and Bacon and had been since 2001.  Second he misinforms the committee by stating he is simply “just counsel” for ALEC.  Behrens has been ALEC’s Civil Justice Task Force “Advisor” for a number of years as reported by the Federalist Society.  Secondly – regarding Behrens’ honesty – as the Civil Justice Task Force advisor, he takes part in the TF’s working groups and actual formulation of legislation.  In those Civil Justice task force meetings his SHB boss, Victor Schwartz is the ALEC Civil Justice Task Force Private Sector Chairman and serves concurrently as the chair of the lobbying practice at Shook, Hardy & Bacon though he is identified in his bio as simply the Chairman of SHB’s Policy Practice.  This alone shows ALEC's Civil Justice Task Force is Chaired by a lobbyist and the TF's adviser is a lobbyist from the same firm...lobbyists entirely control that one single TF.

Behrens and Schwartz sit side by side with the corporate members, work with them to create and write the legislation, offers legal expertise to further advance proposed task force legislation.  Thus, at the Connecticut hearing cited below Behrens knew full well the names of corporations participating in that task force and other activities.  Below he misleads the committee, claiming to not be a member of ALEC and thus has no knowledge about the names of corporate members or where the funding for ALEC comes from.

Clearly this hearing was about ALEC legislation proposed by their state Chairman in Connecticut – though at no time during the hearing was that disclosed.  Behrens’ appearance “on behalf of ALEC” was clearly an attempt to lobby the committee members in support of this ALEC legislation, though Behrens stated he was appearing as ALEC’s counsel.  This is similar to what Behrens did again in 2009 in No. Dakota where he lobbied the state legislature on behalf of ALEC’s proposed Asbestos legislation; but failed to register as a lobbyist for ALEC.  Days later when it was discovered that Behrens and the other SHB lobbyist represented ALEC, and had been openly lobbying on behalf of ALEC, ALEC registered them with North Dakota as lobbyists;

This situation in Connecticut 4 years prior to the ND fiasco, was the same operation on different issues with undisclosed lobbying on behalf of ALEC – by one of the same registered lobbyists who would ultimately be caught in 2009 doing the same thing.  Common Cause has raised this ND incident with the IRS in trying to get ALEC's 501 (c)(3) exemption revoked.  As yet the IRS refuses to act or respond and ALEC continues to get away with these obvious lobbying activities.

You can read the entire hearing transcript at the link below.  I have cut and pasted the pertinent section below the link.


REP. CARUSO: I appreciate it. Our next speaker is Mark Behrens...

MARK BEHRENS: Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee. My name is Mark Behrens. I am a partner with a law firm in Washington, D.C. called Shook, Hardy & Bacon. I am here today on behalf of the American Legislative Exchange Council.

ALEC is the nation's leading membership organization of state Legislators with about 2,400 Legislators nationwide. I understand I have about three minutes today.

I have submitted written testimony to the committee, which should have been passed out earlier this morning. I would ask that that be submitted into the record. I will just summarize my remarks today.

I would strongly support Proposed H.B. 5143, which is to be introduced by Representative Harkins. My understanding is that it's similar to a bill that was considered by this committee last year, which was R.B. 570...

REP. O'ROURKE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I noticed you folks (ALEC)have been pursuing this bill for a year or two now. Generally, I think competitive bidding is very important all across government and something I would want to encourage.

You folks have sort of focused in, your group, ALEC, on the lawyers who were hired. I guess I think, traditionally, when we're doing professional services, the quality, the experience of the people involved, it's not like building a building. You know?

There are a lot of different intangibles that don't exactly equate to the normal low-bid process. Just so I can understand where your organization is coming from on this and why you're focusing in on the lawyers that are hired by the government, where do you folks, the Legislative Exchange Council, get your funding from?

MARK BEHRENS: I am just counsel to ALEC. I don't work there. So I don't know names of companies to rattle off. ALEC is sort of an interesting organization. I've learned more about it.

The reason they call it American Legislative Exchange Council is that ALEC's membership includes public sector members, state Legislators, and private sector members. There are corporate members of ALEC.

REP. O'ROURKE: So, for instance, the big tobacco companies that you mention, they seemed grieved by the tobacco settlements that were forced on them by the action of Attorney Generals across the country.

MARK BEHRENS: I'm not sure.

REP. O'ROURKE: Are they a major funder?

MARK BEHRENS: I don't know whether they are or not, but, frankly, they get nothing out of this bill. Their litigation is water under the bridge at this point. They've entered into their agreement with the Attorney General. That litigation is resolved.

I don't know where they stand, whether they are ALEC members or what their level of funding is. It has absolutely no bearing on this bill because they get nothing out of it.

REP. O'ROURKE: But it's typical, a lot of big business are the funders of the group.

MARK BEHRENS: They get big business funding. Yeah.

REP. O'ROURKE: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Has this shown us clearly how ALEC's agenda is advanced?  How they openly lobby on behalf of "their" model legislation and are supported across the board with every weapon available in Koch's Conservative arsenal - including lies and disinformation?  Is the cabal's mechanics clearly shown from this?  Can we see the tightly concentrated and coordinated manner in which everything available is brought to bear in support of these Initiatives; media, Institutes, organizations and corporations? I believe the answers are all a resounding "YES".

This is why we have continuously and consistently called out to all individual Progressives, groups, media and organizations to come together and coordinate a defense to ALEC and Koch's agenda.  Until we actually present a united front in both a defense to this and to fund an offensive of our own, we are helping enable this kind of agenda.  The outcome will continue to be the same if our efforts remain piecemeal and disorganized.  CMD, PFAW, The Nation, Common Cause, In These Times and dozens of others have published articles about ALEC, the Koch's and their corporate agenda.  These articles are sporadic and and continue to draw attention without inflicting one iota of actual harm to the cabal or their efforts.  While the same conservative players concentrate on defeating President Obama and advancing their free-market philosophies of protecting the wealth of the richest through lowering wages, refusing to allow proper taxes, privatizing everything possible and disenfranchising voters...we stand around waffling about President Obama (as if there is any real question of not supporting him or voting for a Republican candidate in 2012).  We are fighting them state by state, opposing model legislation one by one when we should be fighting them nationally and doing it tooth and nail.

The cabal pools the Koch, DeVos, Scaife, Olin and Murdoch money along with funding from GE Foundation, Shell, PhRMA, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other corporations to fund their activities and advance their ideologies.  They control the MSM and they tell them what stories to follow, what to print and what politicians and model legislation to support.  They bring all of those resources to bear upon us and in return we're refusing to pool our resources and fight for our own ideology.  They have us divided and we all know what comes after division in any conflict.

I hope the foregoing demonstration of the tactics, ideology and coordinated manner used to successfully advance the Conservative agenda is now clearer.  I hope it also demonstrates we're behind the eight ball, underfunded and fighting back in a manner that is beneficial to the Koch and ALEC goals...and awakens more to what has to be done if democracy is going to be saved in the U.S.  They are on the verge of a complete corporate take-over and we're on the verge of becoming the latest addition on the endangered species list.

Please help us fight for democracy as the 2012 election comes closer and closer.  Help us fight them at ALEC's states and nation meeting in Phoenix from November 30th through December 3rd.  Contribute to the efforts of Common Cause, CMD and the others mentioned above.  Along with those contributions let them know it's time to pool information, resources and energy to concentrate our efforts on defeating ALEC once and for all.  Remove the ability to create and pass legislation from the cabal and Kochs.  Abolish ALEC entirely and vote their members from office at every opportunity.

I believe this is the only way forward - unless we want a President Cain, Perry or Bachmann advancing ALEC's agenda far into the future.

Originally posted to Bob Sloan on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 03:43 PM PDT.

Also republished by Earthship Koch, American Legislative Transparency Project, and In Support of Labor and Unions.


Should Progressives come together and pool everything to fight against the agenda of the Conservative Cabal?

88%40 votes
2%1 votes
4%2 votes
4%2 votes

| 45 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks Bob (7+ / 0-)

    The radical Republican party is the party of oppression, fear, loathing and above all more money and power for the people who robbed us.

    by a2nite on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 03:50:29 PM PDT

  •  One thing to remember, as voters, (11+ / 0-)

    is that ALEC operates at the state level. Many people don't realize the importance of down-ballot, state legislative elections. Some people don't even bother turning out to vote in non-presidential years, big mistake. Everybody should know their state reps, follow their state races and vote every time.

    •  I know it is often thought that ALEC's agenda (9+ / 0-)

      is contained to the state pursuits.  However, they have a "federal Initiative" that operates at the U.S. Congressional level (more about that upcoming) and has 100 alumni in that joint assembly that represents Corporate/1% er's interests and advances their pursuits within Congress.

      The Atlantic Bridge Charity in the UK was ALEC's Brit arm and just resulted in a Conservative MP's (Liam Fox) resignation over there.  They have now become aware of ALEC here and the ties between the two organizations.

      So we can no longer continue to be misled into believing that they aren't an international cabal now - by thinking they only operate at the U.S. state level.  Their alumni in Congress have to go as well.  They are the "Good Ol' Boy" forum representing ALEC and the Kochs at our highest levels of government.  Rep Jon Kyle was deeply involved in the Atlantic Bridge scandal, as was Bush/Cheney's go to guy, Scooter Libby: and major Conservative Republican benefactors.

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled"

      by Bob Sloan on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 05:00:51 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The more exposure this organization gets the (8+ / 0-)

    better. It's like sunlight on vampire skin.

    And even though it all went wrong I'll stand before the Lord of Song with nothing on my tongue but Hallelujah! -Leonard Cohen .................@laurenreichelt

    by TheFatLadySings on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 04:16:18 PM PDT

  •  influence of money is root of evil for society (7+ / 0-)

    Pat Buchanan was right; this is a Religious War. The religious right and corporations have been waging it on us for years. And we haven't found a way to show them for what they are; a league of frightened elitists being used by their faith. Their leaders meddle with government while the corporatists of the nation use the authoritarian control religious leaders have over their flocks.
    Want a good revenue source for the government? Rescind the no tax policy for churches. Maybe someone should ask Mr Romney how much could be made from that.

    •  Good analysis and questions. I have long been (5+ / 0-)

      unable to understand the reason for the "charity" exemption provided to churches - since they have become so deeply and openly involved in politics.

      Believe it or not the "Church" of Scientology partnered with ALEC and the National Foundation for Women Legislators, (NFWL) in the late 90's on legislation they wanted to advance, including: "Second Chance Act of 2004" which was  Bush Initiative under the same name: (thankfully it did not pass, but it was introduced time and again during the Bush years.  They wanted to cash in on the state and federal money available for re-entry programs under the "Faith based community initiative" program of Bush (WHOFBCI).

      Rob Portman who introduced this Second Chance Act is an enabler of ALEC's who has received much campaign funding from ALEC's corporate elite over the years:  Portman joins ALEC members in sponsoring legislation, joins their letter writing "Resolution" and in general signs on to anything ALEC.

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled"

      by Bob Sloan on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 05:19:58 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  There's a couple of techniques used by Churches (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        nomandates, Jean Sloan

        to rationalize their disregard for the rules.

        One technique is their distribution of "voting guides". They get handed out by "lay volunteers" outside of church-related functions. The same with phone calls to their "friends" reminding them when and where to vote (and probably who to vote for). Since these people aren't clergy of lay ministers, they skirt the rules this way. Scott Walker used about 50 different "conservative Christian volunteer leaders" to gather their local flocks to hand out pamphlets (voting guides) and make phone calls.

        They are organized in "districts" and "squadrons". Organized crime, imo. They really think that this is war.

        The volunteers aren't paid, of course. That would be illegal. Odds are good that they get rewarded in other ways.

        The voting guides often point to web sites that are blatently partisan. Or they include both sides of an issue and use biased labels. Vote for the angels or the devils, or to keep your rights or give your rights away to heathens, only a little more subtle than that.

        Another technique is to invite candidates to speak at church-related functions. The loophole, as they interpret the rules, is to invite candidates from each party to speak at one event. They deliberately invite the Democratic candidate who has already committed to another function on the date they have chosen.

        So the Republican candidate speaks to the church members and the Democratic candidate is a no-show.

        Both of these things go on everywhere. I've misplaced my link, bu there's a guidebook published by one of the far right wing legal firms that fights these challenges all the time. They somehow keep winning in court.

        If you read the IRS letters and the legal-sleaze letters side by side, it's clear that the IRS prohibits many of their techniques.

        Yet it continues.

        Those are a couple of techniques that came to mind. There are many.

        "All people are born alike - except Republicans and Democrats" - Groucho Marx

        by GrumpyOldGeek on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 06:12:06 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Works like the proverbial "model legislation" and (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          nomandates, GrumpyOldGeek

          other tactics employed.  Side by side comparisons of the IRS code and their activities does clearly show their lobbying.

          A second factor is though they are listed as a charitable 501 (c)(3) over the course of their history they report $0. in charitable work - the same as the Atlantic Bridge "charity" in the UK that just got rolled up - taking Liam Fox, the defense minister with it.  How can the Brits see so clearly and our government be so blind?

          "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled"

          by Bob Sloan on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 06:21:11 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Every time I look at the regs, it makes me angry. (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Bob Sloan, kurt

            Yeah, right. $0 dollars isn't a substantial part of ALEC's "charitable" activities. Unless they just want to destroy the government. Oh, wait.

            An organization will be regarded as operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities that accomplish exempt purposes specified in section 501(c)(3).  An organization will not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities does not further an exempt purpose.
            What might those "chariable" purposes be?
            The exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3) are charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literary, testing for public safety, fostering national or international amateur sports competition, and preventing cruelty to children or animals.  The term charitable is used in its generally accepted legal sense and includes relief of the poor, the distressed, or the underprivileged; advancement of religion; advancement of education or science; erecting or maintaining public buildings, monuments, or works; lessening the burdens of government; lessening neighborhood tensions; eliminating prejudice and discrimination; defending human and civil rights secured by law; and combating community deterioration and juvenile delinquency.

            ??? lessening the burdens of government ???

            How did THAT become "charitable" ?

            "All people are born alike - except Republicans and Democrats" - Groucho Marx

            by GrumpyOldGeek on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 09:15:50 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  Three interrelated points: (4+ / 0-)

    1) I'm guessing that ALEC has some savvy lawyers on staff that can steer clear of technical violations of rules against excessive lobbying.  For example, invited testimony in front of legislative bodies is excluded from the definition of "lobbying" for purposes of 501(c)(3) rules.  

    2) I really, really hate scammy organizations that abuse non-profit status, technical compliance or not

    3) You have a wealth of info on ALEC; have you put together a complaint to the IRS against them?

    •  A complaint is in the works but I hold out no hope (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      GrumpyOldGeek, kurt

      for a factual and honest ruling from the IRS concerning ALEC.  Their tentacles are everywhere.

      As to the issue of "Invited Testimony" you're right...however in most cases it is the ALEC legislative member who "invites" ALEC to attend and testify and that opens the door to lobbyists to attend as "Representatives" of ALEC.  This is precisely how they have been handling their Healthcare Initiative(s) over the past three years or so.  State legislative members invite ALEC to testify before state legislative committees on the issue.  In come Christie Herrera, ALEC's Health and Human Services Task Force Director, along with the normal lobbyists.

      At the federal level ALEC does the same thing, being invited by their Alumni sitting upon committees or representing caucuses.

      A huge and unrealized part of the overall problem.

      "Inmates should be reformed - not recycled"

      by Bob Sloan on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 05:26:02 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  The IRS exceptions seem to be written for ALEC (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Bob Sloan, Eric Nelson, kurt

      Bob didn't include all of the IRS text that applies. The length would be prohibitive. There are also several IRS guides and ruling that attempt to clarify the issues, but they don't address the parts that ALEC seems to depend on.

      Any reasonable person who is capable of deciphering the IRS and legal terminology would conclude that ALEC is in flagrant violation of the rules. But they've gotten through more than one challenge without a whimper.

      "Invited" testimony is an exception, as you point out. Another exception is that "paid" lobbying activities get reported. So ALEC doesn't pay their stooges for lobbying activities. They make it up in speaking or teaching fees. Or they donate to the person's "other" organization. Or PAC. Or a secret PAC ala Crossroads GPS.

      ALEC is slime. Everywhere you look.

      There are so many loopholes that fall into the ALEC "education" model that it looks like the rules have been customized just for ALEC. I hesitate to say that it is. Oh, hell. It is. I have no doubt.

      The most important task right now is to educate people about ALEC and how ALEC has hurt them personally. It's legislation that people don't want or need that gets rammed through corrupt legislatures by graft and bribery. The lazy asshat elected officials must be exposed and removed from office. Their corrupt staff and associates, too.

      "All people are born alike - except Republicans and Democrats" - Groucho Marx

      by GrumpyOldGeek on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 05:40:13 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Wow. A super top tax attorney. What are you (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Bob Sloan

      $750/hr, $1,000/hr? We don't see many like you on this site.

      Are we really as screwed as you make it sound, or are you trying to make it sound that way so that we don't look as hard at trying to find ways to get unscrewed?

      I've read a litle bit of your stuff, and I don't see anything that says that you're concerned about anything but yourself.

      Please feel free to fill in the blanks.

      There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

      by oldpotsmuggler on Mon Oct 31, 2011 at 08:36:40 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  The haves and have mores never have enough n/t (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night, alive as you and me.

    by plankbob on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 05:16:50 PM PDT

  •  Lawyered up, all right (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    GrumpyOldGeek, Eric Nelson

    I worked for that awful firm (SHB) for a time (don't ask). Bob, do me a favor, please please please. The next time you post a poll, please don't give anyone the option to say they don't care. It just enrages me. I hope whoever clicked on that option doesn't have children/grandchildren to have to try to clean up this mess. Give them a pie option instead. Cowpie preferable.

    Thanks, Bob, for the eloquent reporting, as always. I'll be reading into the night about all this, as I always do when you post.

  •  SOSDD (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Bob Sloan, Eric Nelson

    Same old shit, different decade.

    In the last 70 years, Dems have had 3 Presidents.

    The GOP has destroyed democracy.

    Hope we are frustrated enough to join an Occupation locally.


    80 Years of Planning: The Kochs + The Family + Birchers = Tea Party

    It's difficult to be happy knowing so many suffer. We must unite.

    by War on Error on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 06:04:03 PM PDT

  •  bad link?? (0+ / 0-)

    your link to the isn't good.

    Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

    by a gilas girl on Sun Oct 30, 2011 at 10:29:03 PM PDT

  •  the fight against the cabal--being continued (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Bob Sloan

    I look forward to parts 2 and 3 when you tie in some more of the cabal organizations and think tanks--like the ones on the Koch Muckety chart.

    NPRI is important to the #OccupyLasVegas#OccupyTogether group.  It came up in a discussion of the cabal yesterday.  

    shows a lot of the same money as in other cabal ventures.  On their web site, they are already joining the trashing of the Occupy movement.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site