Skip to main content

The Pedia article titled 'Behavioral immune system' is a brief and informative read. I qoute below from the 'Implications for human behavior' section (bolding mine);

Within the psychological sciences, there is extensive research linking the behavioral immune system to a variety of prejudices—including prejudices against people who aren't actually diseased but are simply characterized by some sort of visual characteristics that deviate from those of a subjectively prototypical human being. The disease–avoidant processes that characterize the behavioral immune system have been shown to contribute to prejudices against obese individuals, elderly individuals, and people with physical disfigurements or disabilities.

In addition, the behavioral immune system appears to contribute to xenophobia and ethnocentrism. One implication is that these prejudices tend to be exaggerated under conditions in which people feel especially vulnerable to the potential transmission of infectious diseases.

Additional lines of research on the behavioral immune system have shown that people engage in more reticent and conservative forms of behavior under conditions in which they feel more vulnerable to disease transmission. For instance, when the potential threat of disease is made salient, people tend to be less extraverted or sociable. Evidence suggests that the behavioral immune system also incorporates mechanisms designed to search out and process (heuristic) signs of disease at the level of basic visual attention.

That a person or group who understands this principle and has access to mass media might choose to exploit this ingrained response mechanism for cynical and self serving purposes is not a novel observation. Specifically, by effectively defining political opponents in the public mind as carriers of disease (socialism, negritude, otherness) a Machiavellian operator can gain varying degrees of control over society (Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, a long string of former middle eastern gentlemen now residing either in jail, in exile or in their graves, etc.) to restate the obvious.

Our Princes understand that "Politics is the continuation of War by other means", they have read and understand Machiavelli, Sun Tzu and Carl von Klausewitz, and the reptilian brain and they form their decisions on those bases. If we understand that we can be the Jackie Chan to their Kareem Abdul Jabbar. Swing voters are by definition 'swingable' and to some degree are so because they smell the disease but are not sure which direction the stench is coming from. The true sources of social corruption are the cynical self serving tactics and those who use them to define certain ideas and groups as virtual Plague Rats.

If this is a reasonably accurate model our current political situation then, to paraphrase Sun Tzu "the wise General will use his enemy's greatest strength against him". I think current as well as historical developments clearly show that this job is made far easier than it might otherwise by the Princes' own words and deeds. Metaphorically speaking, the task at hand for we Peasants is not to build the gallows and tie the rope, but just to keep sawing away at the legs of the stool they're standing on having tied the rope around their own necks.

The problem with their approach is that it always becomes a kind of inverse psychological pyramid scheme where favor in The Court of the Princes inevitably contracts over time because the Princes can only maintain control over their equally cynical second tier followers by pitting them against each other. Many will be watching forthcoming developments in the Empire of NewCorp with great interest, knitting the Phrygian Cap, to see how much loyalty there is among the ever-so-clever Princelings when they are looking at the inside rather than the outside of the Bastille/Tower of London.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pluto, boophus, murasaki, bronte17

    "Liberals support..... constitutionalism, liberal democracy, free and fair elections, human rights, capitalism, and the free exercise of religion." Wikipedia. And that's bad how?

    by Old Lefty on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 08:39:02 PM PDT

  •  Très intéressant. (0+ / 0-)

    Democrats promote the Common good. Republicans promote Corporate greed.

    by murasaki on Sat Mar 31, 2012 at 09:59:29 PM PDT

    •  Merci et oui, je pense qu'il est vraiment trop (0+ / 0-)

      Interesting to at least the two of us, non? In fact at just this moment I was preparing to forward this Diary to the Strategy Kos group by way of humble introduction. Reading through the description I found both Sun Tzu and Clausewizt and thought "hmmmm".

      Avez-vous dire de plus ?

      Just getting a handle on the knobs and dials.... Hey, don't touch that!

      by Old Lefty on Mon Apr 02, 2012 at 04:30:45 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site