Skip to main content

I'll be the first to confess: I've been skeptical about Obama.  So, while I'm glad that he's pledged to veto CISPA and any budgetary shenanigans by the R's, I wasn't particularly confident he'd follow through.  I was talking about it with a friend, and he asked "Has Obama actually vetoed anything yet?"

I looked it up.

It turns out that Obama has vetoed two bills since taking office.  The first was an appropriations continuing resolution, H.J.RES.64, a stop-gap defense funding bill that was rendered moot after it was passed by the passage of an actual defense appropriations bill (H.R. 3326).  Boring, procedural fare.

The other, one, though, is far stranger.  H.R. 3808, the "Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010".

From the summary of the bill:

Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010 - Requires each federal and state court to recognize any lawful notarization occurring in or affecting interstate commerce which is made by a notary public licensed or commissioned under the laws of a state other than the state where the court is located.
What was so objectional about this bill that it inspired the only real veto Obama has wielded in over 3 years?  It was sponsored by a Keith Ellison and passed both houses of congress by unanimous consent.  It seems mundane.  What's the big deal?

From the Desk of the President:

  It is necessary to have further deliberations about the possible unintended impact of H.R. 3808, the ``Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010,'' on consumer protections, including those for mortgages, before the bill can be finalized. Accordingly, I am withholding my approval of this bill. (The Pocket Veto Case, 279 U.S. 655 (1929)).

   The authors of this bill no doubt had the best intentions in mind when trying to remove impediments to interstate commerce. My Administration will work with them and other leaders in Congress to explore the best ways to achieve this goal going forward.

   To leave no doubt that the bill is being vetoed, in addition to withholding my signature, I am returning H.R. 3808 to the Clerk of the House of Representatives, along with this Memorandum of Disapproval.

Hunh.  Two sentences stand out there.  First, "The authors of this bill no doubt had the best intentions in mind" is a perfect example of the diplomatically understated condemnation.  It translates from diplo-speak to plain English as something akin to "You guys are psychopathically evil, and I can't believe you thought you'd get away with it."

And second...  "It is necessary to have further deliberations about the possible unintended impact of H.R. 3808, the ``Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010,'' on consumer protections, including those for mortgages."  Mortgages?  What would be the impact of a bill about easier interstate notarization on mortgages?

...Oh.  Right.  Of course.

That little problem with the banks playing so many games with the bad loans they issued that they lost the paperwork proving they actually owned the loans, and thus resorted to mass forgery.  That might be relevant.  I can definitely see how allowing banks to produce documents from Out of State, where the Rules are Laxer might be beneficial to the 1%.

And I can definitely be thankful that the President saw through it.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  One Addendum: (10+ / 0-)

    The veto override failed overwhelmingly, with only 16 Dems in Speaker Pelosi's House voting in favor of the bill.  

    Of those sixteen Dems, six no longer with us, thanks to the R wave of 2010.  The ones who remain in congress are:
    Braley (IA)
    Donnelly (IN)

    Shuler is retiring because the NC redistricting would require he actually put effort into retaining his seat, and Donnelly is running for Senate (Dick Lugar's seat), though I don't think he's officially resigned his house seat.

  •  Nice catch! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I'm surprised about Ellison. Can it be that he was unaware of the consequences of this bill?

    Almost everything you do will seem insignificant, but it is important that you do it. - Mahatma Gandhi

    by NLinStPaul on Fri Apr 27, 2012 at 06:47:13 PM PDT

  •  Intestesting diary ... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SoCalSal, AaronInSanDiego

    Not as eye-catching as others, but the story says something about Obama and his staff that is very interesting to think about in terms of a Bush or (shudder) a Romney response.  Hopefully, people will pay some attention to it!

  •  Fewest vetoes since James Garfield. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Pretty far from the 635 vetoes of FDR. That says something about the president's governing philosophy.  But I hope that number goes up a bit during his second term.

    "Okay, until next time. Keep sending me your questions, and I will make fun of you... I mean, answer them." - Strong Bad

    by AaronInSanDiego on Fri Apr 27, 2012 at 10:21:47 PM PDT

    •  Mixxed feelings, there - (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      The main reason he hasn't vetoed much is that the only things getting through congress are the most insanely milquetoast, watered down do-nothing bills.  He hasn't had anything to veto.

      If he has to start vetoing things, that implies that the R's have taken the Senate.  I really hope that doesn't happen.  I really hope he's given the opportunity to sign bills produced by Speaker Pelosi's house again.

  •  Thanks for reminding us of this. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I recall the notary bill.  I am following the foreclosure mess and this was one of those under the radar moves to facilitate the bankers manufactured foreclosures.  I was surprised and pleased that he made such a quick but strong veto.  Someone was paying attention. He is not perfect but he is good.  I just sent my $100.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site