Skip to main content

I've taken quite a few, over the years...some better than others. I've taken a lot of psychological evaluations over the years, too (a consequence of the type of jobs I have had), and these type of tests remind me of those.  Lots of questions, multiple choice answers, attempting to gauge how strongly you agree with a particular statement.  Often, they will ask the same question several times (scattered throughout the survey), but worded slightly differently, to try to narrow in on some particular nuance.  

Writing survey questions can always be tricky.  You can take that two ways:  tricky to word it in such a way that it will generate an accurate response, or tricky as in manipulative...trying to generate a specific response.  I don't like taking the latter kind, and I wouldn't want to subject you to that, either.  This one appears to be to be pretty objective.

If you are interested thus far, continue below the Orange Kleinur for more on the survey I recently took.

Many of you have probably taken this particular survey before.  I've taken it a few times, and sometimes I feel differently about some of the questions, at least in terms of degree.  I've gotten slightly different results, but always in the same general neighborhood.  I think I may have drifted more to the left over the years.  If you have taken it, it might be interesting to do it again and see if there is a noticeable difference.

This particular test recognizes that the standard spectrum of "left" and "right" is really an over-simplification, and isn't descriptive enough to show the range of possible political beliefs (and policies, of course).  So it plots results on two axes...the tradition Left and Right crossed with another to measure Authoritarian vs. Libertarian.  (Note that "Libertarian" doesn't refer to the political party of that name; their policies don't score very far from the center on that scale, actually).  The creators of the test have this to say about the multi-axis approach:

There's abundant evidence for the need of it. The old one-dimensional categories of 'right' and 'left', established for the seating arrangement of the French National Assembly of 1789, are overly simplistic for today's complex political landscape. For example, who are the 'conservatives' in today's Russia? Are they the unreconstructed Stalinists, or the reformers who have adopted the right-wing views of conservatives like Margaret Thatcher?

On the standard left-right scale, how do you distinguish leftists like Stalin and Gandhi? It's not sufficient to say that Stalin was simply more left than Gandhi. There are fundamental political differences between them that the old categories on their own can't explain. Similarly, we generally describe social reactionaries as 'right-wingers', yet that leaves left-wing reactionaries like Robert Mugabe and Pol Pot off the hook.

To take the test, head over to The Political Compass.  While you are there, poke around.  They've got songs that are supposed to be appropriate to segments of the spectrum, and ways to compare yourself to some more well known political figures.  Then come back here and tell us how you did.  You can do that via my little Poll, below, or as I am going to do, and post a link to the actual graph of my results.

Poll

Which General Area of the Spectrum Do You Fall Into

8%34 votes
2%10 votes
1%5 votes
10%43 votes
53%217 votes
4%20 votes
9%38 votes
2%10 votes
4%19 votes
2%9 votes

| 405 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site