Skip to main content

A group of Paultroons have sued the RNC claiming collusion (not collision) with the Romney campaign. The 132 delgates represent 18 states and 5% of the total elected to the convention.

CNN reports the lawsuit alleges the rule that state delegations must vote for the candidate that won that state's primary or caucus violates federal law. This means delegates who support other candidates are enjoined from voting their conscience in violation of the Constitution. The lawsuit also alleges delegates supporting candidates other than Romney were subjected to harassment by the RNC and Republican state leaders. It consisted of violation of party rules, threats of violence and demands that delegates sign affidavits promising to vote for Romney.
My emphasis.

Now, the non-bolded part of the block quote seems to be standard "If I don't like the result of X, then X must violate the Constitution!" reasoning. However, the bolded part sounds like something that could get someone somewhere in trouble. IANAL, but the people who are supposed to enforce the rules not following the rules can and does lead to suits.

Paul's campaign is not party to the suit. The Paultroons are acting on their own.

CNN has more.

The legal filing, which names Priebus and GOP chairmen in every state as defendants, "seeks the guidance of the court" on whether the plaintiffs are free to break with certain state party rules and vote for the candidate of their choice at the August convention.
Ron Paul conceded Romney has the delegates to win the nomination, but is not yet ready to endorse Willard. I assume he's holding out for a better offer.

The primaries may be over but we still need popcorn!

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site