Skip to main content

Health care reform demonstration with woman holding
Health care advocacy groups and progressives in and out of Congress are watching the Supreme Court as anxiously as any of us. But, in the potential defeat of the mandate by the Republican wing of the court, some see a real opportunity: Medicare for all. That's an opportunity, though, that elected Democrats are going to have to recognize, and start fighting for.
“The right fought [the Affordable Care Act] just as bitterly as they would have fought if it was single payer,” said Chuck Idelson, spokesman for National Nurses United — a union and trade association of registered nurses that has consistently supported Medicare for all.

“Medicare continues to be an extremely popular reform — it’s one of the most popular reforms in U.S. history,” said Idelson. [...]

[I]f the conservative Supreme Court deals a death blow to Obama’s signature legislation, the calculus could change.
“We would certainly encourage him … to say, ‘OK the court didn’t like the way this law was drawn up, ok then let’s go back to square one, let’s do a law that has no constitutional problem—Medicare,’” Idelson said. “And they could probably do this in one page.”

It's can't happen in this Congress, not with the current House. But hopefully we've all learned the lesson of trying to meet Republicans halfway; as Idelson argues, Republicans were going to fight whatever this president and a Democratic congress came up with, no matter what. One lawmaker who learned that lesson well is Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT). He tells Greg Sargent he's ready to fight for Medicare for all.
“If we have repeal by the Supreme Court, we’re back to ground zero — the Reublican goal of a health care system that’s in the iron grip of the insurance companies,” Welch said. “Our question has to be very much in your face to Mr. Boehner — where’s your Plan A?”

“If we argue for Medicare for All, it would reinforce our commitment to Medicare and highlight the Republican plan to turn it iinto a voucher system and unravel it,” Welch continued.[...]

“It works, it’s popular, and people know what it is,” Welch said. “It’s got a lot of stuff we should have done from the beginning.”

There's really not a downside for Democrats politically in pushing Medicare for all, presuming the Republican wing of the Supreme Court prevails tomorrow. Congressional Republicans and Mitt Romney are actively working against expanding health insurance, and they are actively working to curtail Medicare. The Romney-endorsed Paul Ryan budget that they all voted for does just that. (For an example on how smart it would be for Democrats to run on Medicare, look at how Republicans in tight races are running against the Ryan plan.)

A Medicare for all platform allows the Democrats to run against the activist Supreme Court, to run against the horribly unpopular Romney-Ryan Medicare plan, to provide the real contrast between the parties that many voters have struggled to see. And it would excite the hell out of the Democratic base; it would give us something to fight for. What's the worse that could happen? Republicans calling Medicare socialism?

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Alumbrados, filkertom, LouisMartin, jotter, ferg, slinkerwink, deben, greendem, Nina Katarina, Shockwave, wu ming, Pescadero Bill, Andrew C White, CleverNickName, SanJoseLady, hyperstation, Pompatus, Gustogirl, TracieLynn, annrose, nyceve, whenwego, Agathena, bluesteel, chuckvw, shanikka, chimpy, pedrito, retLT, jennifree2bme, oceanview, Eddie C, Tracker, MKS, Noodles, yet another liberal, astronautagogo, The Walrus, Diana in NoVa, zerelda, ybruti, lonespark, ScienceMom, Gowrie Gal, maybeeso in michigan, marina, ichibon, wsexson, SherwoodB, democracy inaction, irate, elkhunter, caliberal2001, dewtx, reflectionsv37, eru, Gordon20024, Tool, SBandini, Ozzie, spunhard, Lindy, Alan Arizona, splashoil, reddbierd, Reality Bites Back, martini, rcbowman, cybersaur, trentinca, Russgirl, kestrel9000, raincrow, kck, gpoutney, gooderservice, Bush Bites, real world chick, Preston S, doinaheckuvanutjob, BlueMississippi, profh, doingbusinessas, Texdude50, means are the ends, blueoregon, sea note, BeerNotWar, BentLiberal, tegrat, One Pissed Off Liberal, old wobbly, pgm 01, out of left field, Habitat Vic, Haningchadus14, Loudoun County Dem, gloriana, puakev, Mary Mike, bnasley, mbh1023, HCKAD, Aunt Martha, martyinsfo, kimtcga, jnhobbs, millwood, gchaucer2, uciguy30, mehamo, wblynch, rmonroe, fb, MKinTN, rogerdaddy, mconvente, Sixty Something, elwior, Jake Williams, Gemina13, petulans, venger, BYw, Nica24, Mike Taylor, vmdairy, statsone, legendmn, McGahee220, George Hier, ceebee7, dark daze, Zotz, geebeebee, Denise Oliver Velez, kevinpdx, Shelley99, Keith Pickering, JEnviro, porchdog1961, Larsstephens, Nalepoc, commonmass, estreya, Tea and Strumpets, Susan Grigsby, Crabby Abbey, angelajean, ATFILLINOIS, Publius2008, elengul, MsGrin, ericlewis0, Actbriniel, slice, Eric0125, no way lack of brain, Jane Lew, Mike08, tosimmonds, sabo33, jm214, southernmapper, SoCaliana, AnotherAmericanLie, nezzclay, EquityRoy, Cinnamon Rollover, thomask, evangeline135, rexymeteorite, sound of progress, VTCC73, Hayate Yagami, jolux, Sunspots, Regina in a Sears Kit House, BoulderStevo, allergywoman, ArtemisBSG, deltadoc, Only Needs a Beat, anodnhajo, cwsmoke, We Won, IndieGuy, Joieau, Yonkers Boy, Horace Boothroyd III, Mr Robert, supercereal, Arahahex, Brown Thrasher, james321, avsp, Glen The Plumber, wasatch, Bisbonian, GoGoGoEverton, doesnotworkorplaywellwithothers, koosah, Carla in Sequim, weck

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site