Skip to main content

     However the 2012 elections turn out, it's not too soon to be thinking about 2016 - because you know there are politicians already out there making calculations and positioning themselves to be ready. The 22nd Amendment has the effect of making any president who gets reelected a lame duck from day one of their second term - and has everyone thinking about the 'succession'. Both parties have names already on a short list.

     For the GOP, the usual practice is to have some foofaraw in the primaries - and then go with the runner-up from 4 years earlier. The Democratic side is usually a little less hierarchal - but there's still a short list of names. Andrew Cuomo, current governor of New York State is on that list. It behooves us therefore, to look at where Cuomo is coming from, and his track record so far. There are indications that a Cuomo run for the White House should give Democrats serious pause.

More below the Orange Omnilepticon.

Background

      Andrew Cuomo comes from a distinguished political family - his father Mario Cuomo was governor of New York and Andrew has a lot of practical experience in the nitty-gritty work of campaigning and governing. At one time he was married to Kerry Kennedy; they divorced in 2003 and Cuomo is currently in a relationship with Food Network host Sandra Lee.

        He's already run up a record of public service, notably as head of HUD for President Clinton, and as Attorney General for New York State before being elected to the governorship following the fiascos of the Spitzer melt-down and the subsequent Paterson shambles. Of note is the episode of the Gang of Four, a group of Democratic State Senators who wrecked the first Democratic majority in the state senate in years in a grab for personal power. The resulting dysfunction in state government handed control of the senate back to the Republicans and effectively ruined Paterson's ability to run for the governorship in his own right. (Of the gang of four, three have left the senate on various criminal charges and convictions; the fourth, Democrat Ruben Diaz Sr. remains as a staunch opponent of abortion rights and same sex marriage.)

The Governorship

     Cuomo's run for the governorship in 2010 was far more successful than his 2002 run, where a gaffe about then governor Pataki hurt him badly with the public, as did his contesting for the nomination with Carl McCall, who was both popular and widely favored. McCall eventually lost and many in the Democratic base (including African Americans) blamed Cuomo for the defeat.

      Cuomo's 2010 run was aided by the Republican nomination of Carl Palladino, a tea party candidate who quickly established himself as a bomb-thrower, mud slinger, and overall extremist. (New Scientist has a fascinating footnote on his campaign - he may have tapped a basic human drive to get the nomination - arousing disgust makes people tend to vote conservative.) In any case, Cuomo won the race with 62% of the vote. (The wikipedia map of voting by county shows Cuomo managed to win quite handily in upstate as well as NYC - downstate areas.)

       As NYS Attorney General, Cuomo had already racked up some positives with some high-profile activities. He forced universities to stop sending students to 'preferred' lenders for loans which saved them from higher interest rates and generated some rebates. He went after some major ISPs, forcing them to take action against child pornography. He handled a delicate political scandal when it became known that then governor Spitzer had been using the State Police to track movements of then Republican Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno, who had become notorious for using state helicopters and other state resources for travel, often combing 'official' business with fund-raising activities. Spitzer and Bruno had long been at odds; Troopergate was a serious setback for Spitzer. (Bruno eventually left the State Senate; he's currently facing retrial on corruption charges.) Cuomo forced Spitzer to apologize; but no other penalties were assessed....

       Cuomo's election to governorship in 2010 has seen a number of successes. The contrast with Spitzer, Paterson, and Palladino certainly didn't hurt. Cuomo followed up by getting state budgets done without the usual months-long delays the New York State Legislature is notorious for, made serious inroads on the state's budget gap, and was able to get same sex marriage through the legislature. He's managed to avoid bruising fights with the legislature while still getting things done, and has been rewarded with high approval ratings from New York Voters.

      A Democratic governor from a Blue state with a solid liberal agenda trophy (same sex marriage) but also with a reputation for fiscal responsibility and high approval ratings would seem to be a natural for a White House run at first glance. But even New Yorkers have some doubts.

Questions

       At the core, the question is, who is Andrew Cuomo working for?

      Every politician makes the calculation "What's good for my base, what's good for me?" in deciding what policies to pursue, what acts to take. Defining those 'goods' (and who the base is) is critical - as is understanding how the politician balances them, because they don't necessarily line up together. When looking at the record, it's also just as important to look at the things not done, the fights not waged, as it is the successes - and the failures. One measure of character after all, is how willing someone is to risk failure, and for what ends. How they cope with failure is another. We need answers to these questions if we are going to evaluate whether or not Andrew Cuomo should be the standard bearer in 2016.

          Cuomo's profession is obvious: he's a career politician. With few exceptions, his life has been about serving in government and running for office. That's not a bad thing in and of itself. If there is going to be government, there has to be people willing to serve in it. Cuomo has ambition, he has talent, and it's also the family business. The question is, how much of his motivation is based on a desire to do well for one's self while doing good for the public, and how much of it is driven by the desire for power?

     Political dynasties are always problematic for democracies because family connections can offer real advantages to candidates for political office - money, endorsements, favors - that trump real ability or fitness for office. You have only to look at Mitt Romney or George W. Bush to see how toxic the effects can be. (And there's plenty of examples on the Democratic side.) How much of Cuomo's political muscle is based on who he is, versus who he's related to?

     It's instructive to look at his actions as governor to date. While he pushed for same  sex marriage and got it through the legislature, New York State isn't the hardest place to have done that, and it's not something that would be a big problem for most of his base. On other issues, the record is mixed.

     He was able to balance the state budget (mostly) - but he did it by throwing state employee unions under the bus and going after their pensions, along with budget cuts to state programs, education, fee hikes, etc. And while he was doing that, he was strongly resisting a millionaire's tax despite widespread public approval for one.

      The fight over state employee pensions in the name of a budget fix is especially nonsensical, in that the proposed changes do nothing to close the gap now - only years down the road. But, it plays well with voters unhappy about taxes and resentful of state workers whose union membership makes them a target because they actually get something out of it. And when it comes to raising the minimum wage in New York State, Cuomo is strangely ambivalent, despite the clout his high ratings should give him. It seems a clear indication Cuomo is primarily a business friendly Democrat, and just who he thinks matters in his base.

     Other troubling matters are fights he didn't wage, promises he broke. Cuomo had campaigned on cleaning things up in Albany - not surprising how many scandals have taken place recently. So, despite the wishes of a majority of New Yorkers, it was a surprise when Cuomo signed off on letting the state legislature continue to gerrymander its districts, the only thing keeping Republicans in control of the state senate. (Details here - they are unbelievable. Alan Chartock weighs in with an analysis of Cuomo's rationale.)

     Part and parcel of how Cuomo measures up when it comes to taking serious action to make the legislature accountable for the endemic corruption among its members is the latest travesty passing for ethics reform. New York State has long had a reputation for breeding toothless watchdogs when it comes to policing the highest levels of state government, and crafting elaborate loopholes in the regulations; Cuomo has traded political peace for meaningful reform.

      Perhaps even more troubling is the growing awareness that the Cuomo administration is obsessive about controlling information; transparency is NOT a hallmark of the state under Andrew Cuomo. State Agencies are now far less able to respond to routine inquiries by the press; the governor's office insists on clearing everything.

        The Albany Times Union has been in an escalating battle to obtain what should be public information; Cuomo's people are going all out to restrict access. Of particular interest is exactly what Cuomo did while attorney general during the Troopergate investigation. It's not merely that Cuomo was investigating a sitting Democratic governor and political ally, it's also that he was investigating a political rival, and the way the state uses its police powers through an office Cuomo already had his eyes on. The Times Union's efforts to look at the records from that time are encountering some real resistance.

While the governor took office vowing to run an administration that is "the most transparent and accountable in history," he and his team are noted for their meticulous management of information.

This tendency appears to extend to the Archives. Lacewell, a top deputy to Cuomo at the attorney general's office, removed several documents from the case files after reporters had seen them. She extracted the daily calendars and notebooks of Ellen Biben, who managed the attorney general's Public Integrity Bureau for Cuomo before becoming the state's top ethics watchdog this year, even though many of the items in the schedules appeared to be mundane. Lacewell even pulled a presentation on how to improve traffic on the office's website.

The governor's press secretary, Josh Vlasto, joined Lacewell at the Archives when he and Lacewell were contacted after reporters photocopied some documents that had been authorized for public viewing after Lacewell's initial screening.

      The efforts by Cuomo's staff to control access to records has been noted by the NY Times; an editorial makes some critical assessments.
We have long experience of seeing Mr. Cuomo — any politician really — try to protect the privacy of internal debates where public policy is created. But the Cuomo inner circle seems determined to write these debates out of history by causing any record of them to disappear instantly and permanently. The governor does not use or encourage e-mail. He and his staff communicate with what they believe are untraceable BlackBerry messages. A new policy essentially describes electronic documents as unworthy of preservation, saying they “are not records and are therefore suitable for immediate destruction.”
 The Times Union weighs in today.
It was a tumultuous chapter in the state’s recent history: open warfare between a governor and a legislative leader (both soon to be disgraced by other scandals), with multiple investigations — including one by an ambitious attorney general with eyes on the governorship himself. It cries out, even now, for detail.

Yet here’s Mr. Cuomo’s office, insisting virtually everything besides already-released press releases or reports is “attorney work product” or protected by attorney-client privilege.

That’s a stretch. These attorneys — Mr. Cuomo and his staff — worked for the public. It’s the client, not the lawyer, that attorney-client privilege is supposed to protect. We don’t hear the public calling for the records of a long-closed investigation to be kept secret.

Conclusions

     While 2016 is still four years away, it's clear any consideration of Andrew Cuomo for a run for the White House has to deal with some serious questions. His union bashing and tax policies should be real red flags for anyone concerned about the fate of the middle class, working people, and the vast inequality afflicting this country. The corrosive power of money in politics is destroying our democracy. It's not clear Andrew Cuomo would be on the right side of that issue.

     His accommodation with 'politics as usual' when it comes to ethical reform should also be a warning sign. We're already seeing the consequences of 'not looking back' at some truly egregious legal and moral lapses in government. The last thing we need is more of the same.

      If the Democratic Party is going to attack a Republican candidate for lying about and concealing records about his taxes, his business career, his role in the Salt Lake City Olympics, and his one term as a state governor, the shoe is definitely going to be on the other foot if Cuomo is the candidate in 2016. That alone should sink a Cuomo run for the Oval Office.

Poll

Andrew Cuomo 2016:

22%11 votes
48%24 votes
4%2 votes
4%2 votes
10%5 votes
8%4 votes
0%0 votes
2%1 votes

| 49 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (11+ / 0-)

    If not Cuomo, who would you like to see run in 2016. And if you like Cuomo, feel free to say why.

    "No special skill, no standard attitude, no technology, and no organization - no matter how valuable - can safely replace thought itself."

    by xaxnar on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 09:33:21 AM PDT

  •  Hillary, of course (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    licorice114, vcmvo2, pademocrat, Jeremimi

    If Hillary won't run then I'm not sure.  I am not feeling for Cuomo.

  •  frack him (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Shahryar

    i wish it were possible for a true progressive champion from oregon to have a shot, but the money game will make it all but impossible for merkley ever to mount a serious run.

    The cold passion for truth hunts in no pack. -Robinson Jeffers

    by Laurence Lewis on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 09:46:40 AM PDT

  •  Valuable summary of a likely (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    xaxnar, eXtina, Byrnt, pademocrat

    candidate.

    AC isn't my first pick among possible Democrats for 2016, though.  I expect him to be in the thick of it for the primaries.  But I think the nomination will eventually go to another Democrat.  

  •  I'd go for (0+ / 0-)

    Jerry Brown

    He's outgrown his Governor Moonbeam moniker. He's working with an unworkable system in California, but getting things done, even though he is making painful cuts. A lot of people ar unhappy, but he's an effective politician. CEO's make terrible public servants. It has to be in your blood, and it is in Jerry's.

    I am progressive. I am liberal. I make no apologies. - Kos

    My political compass: - 8.38,-6.97

    by pucklady on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 09:48:07 AM PDT

  •  Kirsten Gillibrand would be a better choice than (7+ / 0-)

    Cuomo by far.

    Oh for crying out loud!

    by 4mygirls on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 09:48:52 AM PDT

  •  Gov. Brian Schweitzer (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Remediator, xaxnar, nupstateny, Byrnt, chemborg

    ...would be a reasonable nominee.

    But none of these possible contenders is in the same league as Pres. Obama.

    contraposition.org - thoughts on energy, the environment, and society.

    by barath on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 09:50:14 AM PDT

  •  My first choice at this moment (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Farkletoo, howd, fatherof2

    would be Elizabeth Warren, provided she wins her bid for the Senate.

    I also think Russ Feingold would be a good possible choice, although being booted from the Senate gives him a severe handicap out of the starting gate.

    The world is a den of thieves and night is falling. -Ingmar Bergman

    by Pirogue on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 10:05:20 AM PDT

  •  Joe Manchin wants to run. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Farkletoo

    It doesn't seem fair that West Virginia should be the only state to have the benefit of this great leader.

    So think twice about dissing Cuomo.

  •  Anybody but Cuomo (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    nervousnellie, xaxnar, nupstateny, Byrnt

    I would vote for a Green candidate, before I would vote for him.

    If I would vote for him, I might just as well vote for a real Republican, not a faux one.

    You can't take the sky from me!

    by wrights on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 10:26:39 AM PDT

  •  Martin O'Malley (5+ / 0-)

    is who I think is up and coming. He has none of Cuomo's short comings. Worked fiercely for Same Sex Marriage here, got it signed into law and will work to defeat the repug referendum on it this Fall.

    He's great on the Unions, charming and smart. He supports the Middle Class. Works on helping those in need unapologetically.

    He's been a great Governor. Was Baltimore's Mayor for 2 full terms and before that in County government.

    He's head of the Democratic Governor's Association and a great spokesman for the party.

    In our sleep, pain which cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart until, in our own despair, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God ~RFK

    by vcmvo2 on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 11:24:02 AM PDT

  •  No way, no how will I vote for (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    eXtina, 4mygirls, PorridgeGun

    him.

    A recent poll indicated that most New Yorkers like the job he's doing, but would not support a presidential run by him.

    The TU has been doing a pretty good job of publicizing his questionable activities, including his super pac which received 2 million dollars from the WI American Indians looking to build casinos here in NY.  If he could have, he would have had them already building them.


    The religious fanatics didn't buy the republican party because it was virtuous, they bought it because it was for sale

    by nupstateny on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 11:26:02 AM PDT

  •  listening to his voice is like nails on a (0+ / 0-)

    Chalkboard

    "I'm sculpting now. Landscapes mostly." ~ Yogi Bear

    by eXtina on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 11:39:12 AM PDT

  •  I will NOT vote for Cuomo in a Dem primary... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    xaxnar, 4mygirls

    ...if there is at least one other Democrat on the presidential primary ballot by the time the Illinois primaries roll around. I'd vote for that nutcase Dennis Kucinich if he was the only one running against Andrew Cuomo, and I can't stand Kucinich!

    Cuomo is the leader of the Republican Wing of the Democratic Party.

    Joe Lieberman, Mike Madigan, Andrew Cuomo, and Tim Cullen...why are they Democrats?

    by DownstateDemocrat on Sun Jul 29, 2012 at 01:44:15 PM PDT

  •  Schweitzer '16 (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    xaxnar, pademocrat

    Gov. Schweitzer pushes for Single Payer in Montana:

    Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, not willing to wait for the Affordable Care Act to kick in in two or three years, is challenging the federal government to start having a dialogue about real health care reform now by allowing Montana to set up a system modeled on "SaskCare," the Saskatchewan health system, the first universal health care system among the Canadian provinces.

    In an interview with Daily Kos Friday, Schweitzer talked about his rationale for the plan. It builds on a request he made last year for a Medicaid waiver for his state to set up a "Medicaid Part D" program, as he called it, a prescription benefit plan for all Montanans. That proposal, intended to hit at the heart of a long-time Schweitzer foe—the pharmaceutical industry—would have allowed the state to offer a prescription drug program to all Montana citizens that would provide the drugs at Medicaid prices.

    "Montana has a population of 990,000 people," he explains. "Saskatchewan has a population of 1,050,000. Their average age is about the same average age of Montana. They're about 10 percent Indian, we're about 7 and a half percent Indian. The other ethnic groups—they're a mirror image of us ... So we have the same ethnic population, we're farmers, we're loggers, we're miners, we're oil developers ... They, in Saskatchewan, live two years longer and have lower infant mortality."

    http://www.dailykos.com/...

    •  Governor Schweitzer biography: (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      xaxnar, fatherof2
      Born in Havre in 1955, the fourth of six children -- five sons and a daughter -- of Kay and Adam Schweitzer. Raised on his parent's registered cattle ranch in the Judith Basin, Brian is a third generation Montanan. His German and Irish grandparents immigrated to Montana near the turn of the century and homesteaded in Hill County, and they are buried there today.

      Brian earned a Bachelor of Science degree in International Agronomy from Colorado State University, and later earned a Master of Science degree in Soil Science from Montana State University. Brian married Nancy Hupp, his college sweetheart, in 1981. Nancy was raised in Billings and received her Bachelor of Science degree in Botany from Montana State University.

       A Montana farmer and rancher, Brian has been signing the front side of a paycheck for over 25 years. He has owned and operated Montana farms in Flathead, Sanders, Rosebud, and Judith Basin Counties. His business and agricultural experience is broad and deep, including extensive farming and ranching experience in Montana, and successful agricultural business projects on five continents.

      After graduation from Montana State, Brian and Nancy began a career of irrigation development that took them to Africa, Asia, Europe and South America. He has built hundreds of miles of roads, poured thousands of yards of concrete, buried many miles of pipe, and built hundreds of structures, from houses to warehouses to distillation plants. During seven years in Saudi Arabia, Brian developed over 28,000 acres of irrigated cropland.

      But when it was time to raise a family, Brian and Nancy returned home to Montana in 1986, and began building a ranching and irrigation business in Montana.

      In 1993, Brian was appointed by the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture to serve on the Montana State USDA Farm Service Agency committee. He served for seven years with the FSA, and his three-person committee was responsible for the operation of 46 county offices, 300 employees and a budget of more than $300 million. He resigned in 1999 to run for U.S. Senate.

      Brian has been active in developing and implementing national farm policy, and ensuring that the voice of local Montanans is heard. In 1995, he received an award from the Secretary of Agriculture for outreach efforts to Native Americans. In 1996, Brian was appointed to the Montana Rural Development Partnership Board. In 1999, he was appointed to the National Drought Task Force, a 16-member national board, to review policy and report to Congress an improved coordination response to drought emergencies nationwide.

      Brian’s life experiences are broad and diverse. He has learned to fly his own plane, obtained a Montana Boiler’s license, has communicated in several languages and has a chemical applicator’s license.

      On November 2, 2004 Brian was elected as Montana's first democratic governor since 1988. Brian Schweitzer became the 23rd Governor of the great state of Montana on January 3, 2005.

      Brian and Nancy have three children, sons Ben and Khai and daughter Katrina.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site