Skip to main content

An airplane pulls a banner in protest to remarks made by U.S. Republican presidential nominee and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney over the site of the Univision Facebook
Turns out Mitt Romney should have been worried about the '47 percent' after all
Hmmm:
Ed Gillepsie, senior adviser to Mitt Romney, told reporters that the Republican presidential candidate is ready to talk about his comments on Americans who don’t pay federal income tax:

“We wouldn’t be surprised, obviously, if that came up in the debate, and the governor’s prepared, obviously, to respond to that. We believe the voters will see and appreciate the fact that what Governor Romney’s talking about would improve the quality of life for 100 percent of Americans.”

But that's not at all what Romney said. What he said was that 47 percent of Americans are freeloading moochers who "will vote for the president no matter what." These people, Romney said, "pay no income tax" and as a result "our message of low taxes doesn't connect."

The night the video was released, Romney doubled down. "Among those that pay no tax," he said, "I’m not likely to be highly successful with the message of lowering taxes." Romney also said those voters wouldn't be attracted to his plan to cut spending. "Those who are reliant on government are not as attracted to my message of slimming down the size of government," he said.

So it's abundantly clear that despite Gillespie's spin, Mitt Romney and his campaign didn't (and don't) think his message will appeal to 100 percent of voters. But that's not the mortal sin here: nobody really thinks every political campaign could possibly appeal to 100 percent of voters. The real problem is that Romney went beyond his political analysis and literally wrote them off, not just as potential voters, but as productive members of American society.

We've all seen the quotes before, but they are worth repeating. First:

All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them.
And then:
And so my job is not to worry about those people—I'll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.
That goes way beyond political analysis. He's not just saying he'll never get their votes, he's saying that 47 percent of Americans will never by worthwhile citizens. If Romney had never said that, this whole thing probably would have blown over—but not only did he say it, but he's repeatedly defended it. And he can't simply make it go away by blurting out some nonsense during the debate about how he really cares about 100 percent of Americans and that anyone who says otherwise is lying about him.

There's a reason that among the two-thirds of voters who have heard about Romney's comments, more than twice as many had a negative reaction as a positive reaction. (Among independents, it was three times as negative as positive and among Democrats it was nearly 18 times more negative than positive.) The reason for the negative reaction is simple: Mitt Romney, using his own words during an unscripted moment that he believed was private, arrogantly and callously dismissed half the nation as worthless. And that's not something he can undo with a scripted zinger.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site