Skip to main content

Yesterday I ran excerpts from a puff piece that the biggest paper in Minnesota did about Michele Bachmann. Read the excerpts from the lead in the piece and then read about the reader reaction, today...

From the Minneapolis Star Tribune"

The baby knocked over a glass of water. Without missing a beat, Rep. Michele Bachmann crouched down to mop up the mess.

"I'm used to it," said Bachmann, who is facing an unexpectedly tough re-election campaign for her fourth term in Congress. "Just like I'm cleaning up the mess in Washington. How many times have I cleaned up spilled milk at home? I was fully prepared to do what I do in D.C."

Bachmann dealt with the puddle, then ran a wet wipe across the baby's cake-covered face for good measure, all while answering a constituent's question about the medical device tax in the president's health care bill. It was Thursday afternoon in Forest Lake, and Bachmann was on the third stop of a daylong swing through the Sixth District.

Yeah, that's how the Minneapolis Star Tribune ("the Strib") presents Congress's most notorious national demagogue in the run-up to election day. According to the leading paper in Minnesota: she' s a supermom/policy whiz! The reporter's name is Jennifer Brooks. When I called that to your attention here yesterday, people began to write in to her twitter feed--excoriating her for puffing a documented nut, liar, and bigot without providing any context. (CORRECTION, Oct 8, 2012: In this article I may have given readers the impression that a lot of people wrote in to Brooks' twitter feed to complain. That turns out not to be true; only a few seem to have done so. My misunderstanding about the number of readers who wrote in is due to my misunderstanding of emails I read that morning. I regret the error.)

People who read the excerpts from Brooks' puff piece began to give her a hard time at her twitter feed. She was portraying Michele Bachmann as some kind of "supermom/policy expert"--and leaving out any mention of twelve years of conspiracy theories, overt bigotry, sowing hatred, etc.   
(CONTINUED)

Here's what you need to know. Even if you see Michele Bachmann wiping a cute little baby's face--even if you see that with your own eyes--you know that that is not what Michele Bachmann is "about" politically. If you're a reporter or editor and you are willing to reduce Bachmann's political significance to that endearing image--you're helping an extremist nut to stay in government.

And you know that.

And you know that doing that--is wrong. It's not in doubt that Bachmann's an extremist nut, liar and bigot. That's a matter of record, out of Bachmann's own mouth--since before 2006. We can only conclude that this paper, this editor, and this reporter are trying to help her to win when they run pieces like this.

Back to the details...

Ms. Brooks got mad about the heat she was drawing for running a crap piece. She passive-aggressive'd me at my Twitter feed...

   @BillPrendergast Aw, pumpkin. I am butthurt that you didn't link to my Jim Graves story too. bit.ly/UvAobz
Very professional. But I took her suggestion and checked out her Graves story, the one she pointed me to. I expected that Brooks' point would be: "well, if I did puff Bachmann in the piece you criticize--you should note that I also puffed Graves in a different piece I wrote--now that's what I call balance."

So here's an excerpt from her piece on Graves:

   Bachmann canceled the interview she had scheduled for this story. But her campaign spokesman, Chase Kroll, railed against Graves' attempts to appeal to Bachmann's conservative base. "The thing about Jim Graves is that he will say different things depending on the audience he's talking to," Kroll said.
You know--I don't see any "puffing Graves" or "free political advertising for Graves" in this piece, the one Brooks pointed us to. I don't see it as "balance in puffing." (In any case, I don't see "balance in puffing" as a desirable goal for political journalists. I see "balance in puffing" as a journalistic goal for airheads.)

I ended up by concluding that Brooks was going for the non sequitur as a form of self-defense. That was probably the best way to go: it would be very hard for reporter Brooks to give a serious, sincere explanation of why she was offering the equivalent of free political advertising to Michele Bachmann. (It's not even clear that Bachmann consents to talk to reporter Brooks for the pieces Brooks writes about this race.)

Here's my suggestion: if the candidate won't talk to you, and your "political reporting" is reduced to typing up the candidate's interaction with babies--trying looking stuff up. If Bachmann interacts with a baby and won't talk to you--look up her voting record on protecting children's health care. (There's a "news" angle for ya.) If you're reduced to writing about how Bachmann helped an elderly person across the street, write up her record on protecting Social Security and Medicare. (That contrast between "cartoon compassion" and "heartlessness"--is a news angle.)

But these suggestions assume that Brooks and the Strib are interested in printing news. Right now, they seem to be more interested in re-electing Michele Bachmann.

The City Pages (the leading alternative weekly in Minneapolis/St. Paul) did follow up piece. But it's mostly about what I printed here on the Kos yesterday.

The point is that you guys who wrote in made a difference today, calling attention to the Strib's ridiculous Bachmann puffery and equally ridiculous attempt at a lame ass defense.

Thank you.

ACTION LINK: You can see what Bachmann challenger Grave is up against in the local corporate media. Please help him defeat this nut.
https://secure.actblue.com/...

The Strib piece that Brooks cited in her defense:
http://www.startribune.com/...

Star Tribune blasted for "puff" Michele Bachmann coverage
By Aaron Rupar Tue., Oct. 2 2012 at 7:57 AM
http://blogs.citypages.com/...

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

skybluewater, Thumb, JekyllnHyde, Sylv, vicki, RF, melo, decembersue, deben, texaseditor, Bob Love, bosdcla14, Minnesota Deb, ChicDemago, eeff, rubyr, xynz, niemann, davelf2, Morgana, missLotus, TracieLynn, EricS, whenwego, biscobosco, KMc, Xapulin, joe pittsburgh, polaris2, farmerhunt, Dhavo, retLT, jalbert, PeteZerria, Nate Roberts, Alna Dem, sidnora, aitchdee, wader, Rotegard, Texknight, NMRed, tomephil, psnyder, Joe Bacon, TexDem, hoolia, kj in missouri, cosette, Sychotic1, lcrp, riverlover, Lilith, walkshills, Diana in NoVa, zerelda, Curt Matlock, mungley, tomjones, Black Max, valadon, boran2, Josiah Bartlett, xxdr zombiexx, bibble, Limelite, sawgrass727, Gowrie Gal, Skennet Boch, Los Diablo, humphrey, maybeeso in michigan, historys mysteries, NoMoreLies, Ckntfld, blueyedace2, deepfish, LarisaW, SherwoodB, Chinton, OpherGopher, Erik the Red, PBen, wallys son, kamarvt, citizenx, basquebob, MT Spaces, dewtx, myeye, Praxxus, Dobber, Gary Norton, eru, PSzymeczek, SaraBeth, The Grace Kelly, Kayakbiker, Phil S 33, markdd, sunbro, spunhard, Savvy813, Shotput8, Brian B, peacestpete, Ekaterin, kkjohnson, Alan Arizona, Land of Enchantment, zozie, xaxnar, irishwitch, myboo, hungrycoyote, tonyahky, liberalconservative, seefleur, kestrel9000, Magnifico, Shakludanto, arlene, raincrow, blueoasis, MJ via Chicago, philipmerrill, Rosaura, gooderservice, SadieSue, bleeding heart, ER Doc, Dinclusin, middleagedhousewife, democracy is coming, doingbusinessas, kurt, Statusquomustgo, Bernie68, Hedwig, Temmoku, ms badger, AllanTBG, Sapere aude, Ken in MN, Russ Jarmusch, moodyinsavannah, EdSF, yoduuuh do or do not, edsbrooklyn, sfbob, newpioneer, ubertar, crose, SeaTurtle, jnhobbs, millwood, Bridge Master, jhop7, pioneer111, Wreck Smurfy, uciguy30, GeorgeXVIII, leonard145b, trueblueliberal, wuod kwatch, TomP, Empower Ink, JDWolverton, revm3up, TruthFreedomKindness, BobBlueMass, califdem, OleHippieChick, mamamedusa, Sixty Something, Youffraita, Involuntary Exile, dadadata, elwior, skohayes, Cat Servant, Old Lefty, Akonitum, mikeconwell, pamelabrown, bluesheep, Jeff Y, mofembot, Liberal Of Limeyland, dzog, shortgirl, statsone, oldliberal, Rhysling, rubyclaire, Glacial Erratic, rudewarrior, Neon Vincent, ARS, litoralis, mjkellett, Carol in San Antonio, susanWAstate, Zotz, I give in to sin, mkor7, elziax, dskoe, politicalceci, kevinpdx, haremoor, Larsstephens, ruscle, chambord, Its the Supreme Court Stupid, mamamorgaine, confitesprit, p gorden lippy, Captain Marty, drainflake77, Orlaine, klompendanser, Crabby Abbey, freeport beach PA, ATFILLINOIS, Eddie L, cordgrass, pixxer, ItsSimpleSimon, dlemex, apip0115, DiegoUK, itswhatson, rja, Texnance, Loose Fur, Oh Mary Oh, Actbriniel, JanG, Jane Lew, Jasel, kerflooey, MidwestTreeHugger, meralda, Quite Contrary, winter outhouse, implicate order, jm214, OldGrammy, Mr Raymond Luxury Yacht, Nicci August, lillyspad, SoCaliana, jakewaters, Alice Olson, molunkusmol, marleycat, zukesgirl64, thomask, muddy boots, RfrancisR, SueM1121, IB JOHN, jgnyc, illegal smile, peregrine kate, Calvino Partigiani, mali muso, poliwrangler, Wood Dragon, VTCC73, diffrntdrummr, old mark, chuck412, Vatexia, Hayate Yagami, SteelerGrrl, stlsophos, Davui, No one gets out alive, Mathazar, YaNevaNo, Sister Inspired Revolver of Freedom, livingthedream, jacey, ridemybike, stormicats, Prairie D, KiB, OldDragon, sow hat, angry marmot, Williston Barrett, Siri, MikeyB33, IndieGuy, joanil, Joieau, a2nite, Deep Texan, Trotskyrepublican, This old man, Arahahex, BusyinCA, MartyM, wxorknot, oldpotsmuggler, raina, George3, Marjmar, Robynhood too, Hammerhand, idlemoments, DamselleFly, Panacea Paola, countwebb, Eric Twocents, Late Again, Neapolitan, broths, Nautical Knots, Smoh, ET3117, rigcath, The Beet, bontemps2012, Jim Domenico, ConfusedSkyes, OregonWetDog, Kombema, shinobi9

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site