This is a serious question for everyone who is truly interested in America's future.
The debate between Romney and Obama was like listening to a debate about the existence of Bigfoot. On one side was Obama having a boring rhetoric that states, Bigfoot doesn't exist. There's no proof that it exists and anyone who thinks it exists is just being ridiculous.
On the other side was Romney having a boring rhetoric stating that Bigfoot is an amazing anomaly in our world. That it doesn't matter what science or the lack of proof states. It's just more fun to believe in Bigfoot. Isn't it?
The truth is even though Obama's truth may not be fun, exciting or exhilarating, ultimately it's the truth. Romney's truth, even if it's different, safe and digestible, ultimately it's a lie.
What this election comes down to is the decision between the boring truth and the exciting lie.
What will people vote for? I suppose it will be the same as any other vote. People will vote for excitement over the truth every time. And then they will boast about it.