Skip to main content

How many times can Mitt Romney prove he is totally clueless about the challenges of ordinary people before the American voters believe it?

Today, once again, Romney's lack of understanding and sympathy for those without health insurance is revealed in an interview with the Columbus Dispatch, where he wildly purports, with no substantiation, that under "his health plan" those with pre-existing conditions would get a chance to buy insurance, but then if they do not, they could not get it later.

He also minimized the consequences of people not having insurance, and appears not to understand that poor people can not afford health insurance, but rather he appears to believe that poor people lack health care insurance due to flawed judgement and choosing to be "free-loaders."

“We don’t have a setting across this country where if you don’t have insurance, we just say to you, ‘Tough luck, you’re going to die when you have your heart attack,’  ” he said as he offered more hints as to what he would put in place of “Obamacare,” which he has pledged to repeal.

“No, you go to the hospital, you get treated, you get care, and it’s paid for, either by charity, the government or by the hospital. We don’t have people that become ill, who die in their apartment because they don’t have insurance.” ...

“You have to deal with those people who are currently uninsured, and help them have the opportunity to have insurance,” said Romney, who favors letting states craft their own plans. ... “But then once people have all had that opportunity to become insured, if someone chooses not to become insured, and waits for 10 or 20 years and then gets ill and then says ‘Now I want insurance,’ you could hardly say to an insurance company, ‘Oh, you must take this person now that they’re sick,’ or there’d literally be no reason to have insurance.

But, the The Center for Disease Control estimates that 45,000 people die each year due to lack of health care, and I suspect the real number is vastly higher. (Updated from 26,000 - See below)

Please notice that Romney does not suggest any remotely plausible plan for how he intends to accomplish this miracle, already successfully achieved in President Obama's Affordable Care Act which he vows to repeal.  

How are states going to pay for this coverage? Why will they do it when he is president if they haven't done it already? Why will he find his reforms any easier to pass than President Obama did?  Why are journalists not even asking these questions?

In his debate with President Obama, Mitt Romney claimed people with pre-existing conditions could get coverage under his plan, but then his campaign issued a clarification that this was not the case, and it would be left up to states. States which under Paul Ryan's budget will have vastly less money because the Romney-Ryan Duo of Doom intends to slash their Medicaid funding.  

Bonnie Kavoussi reports that 26,000 deaths occur each year due to lack of health insurance, and that 49 million Americans do not have health insurance.

Romney took a similar stance in an interview with CBS' "60 Minutes" in late September, when he said: "We do provide care for people who don't have insurance. If someone has a heart attack, they don't sit in their apartment and die. We pick them up in an ambulance, and take them to the hospital, and give them care." ...

Letting so many people go uninsured ultimately can cost both individuals and society. When people lack health insurance, their health worsens, and their health treatments become more expensive, research has found. People without health insurance also are in danger of facing massive medical bills, debt, and bankruptcy if they get sick or injured.

On top of that, society at large sometimes must pay for the uninsured through higher taxes and health care costs. The government often helps pay for unpaid emergency room bills. States and cities that run hospitals lose money when hospital bills go unpaid. And economists have found that hospitals sometimes charge higher prices for health care, and health insurance companies sometimes charge higher premiums, because the uninsured often are unable to pay for health care.

This "Baffle Us With Bull Shit," BUWBS, Romney maneuver appears to be another example of Romney's "steer to center" trick Rachel Maddow pointed out last night. She described about half a dozen examples where in the afternoon Romney makes moderate statements on health care, abortion, and other topics, and then his campaign immediately issues "clarifications" or all out denials to the conservative press in the evening, which do not get reported in the traditional media. As in, wink, wink, nod, "don't worry, I'm just saying this to get elected by gullible independents, then I'll be as severe a conservative as you can imagine after I'm elected."

How can traditional media outlets have any pride, self-respect, or sense of journalistic integrity if they see this consistent pattern of behavior, completely understand the motivation, yet not preface every report that contains Romney's BUWBS ploy with "here he goes again"?

3:46 PM PT: Mil offers us this link to a Harvard Gazette report asserting a

New Study Finds 45,000 Deaths Annually Linked to Lack of Health Coverage.



Nearly 45,000 annual deaths are associated with lack of health insurance, according to a new study published online today by the American Journal of Public Health. That figure is about two and a half times higher than an estimate from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2002.

The study, conducted at Harvard Medical School and Cambridge Health Alliance, found that uninsured, working-age Americans have a 40 percent higher risk of death than their privately insured counterparts, up from a 25 percent excess death rate found in 1993.

“The uninsured have a higher risk of death when compared to the privately insured, even after taking into account socioeconomics, health behaviors, and baseline health,” said lead author Andrew Wilper, M.D., who currently teaches at the University of Washington School of Medicine. “We doctors have many new ways to prevent deaths from hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease — but only if patients can get into our offices and afford their medications.”

The study, which analyzed data from national surveys carried out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), assessed death rates after taking into account education, income, and many other factors, including smoking, drinking, and obesity. It estimated that lack of health insurance causes 44,789 excess deaths annually.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site