Skip to main content

Last night in the Kos' Election Diaries, your attention was drawn to a Survey USA/KSTP poll that showed Michele Bachmann currently running nine points ahead of her Dem opponent Jim Graves in this year's race. The Minnesota Progressive Project blog contacted a reliable source familiar with the Graves campaign who offered the following information about polling...

A Greenberg Quinlan poll commissioned by the Graves campaign was conducted on Oct. 3-4. It shows the following:

Bachmann: 47
Graves: 45

That result is in line with other polls conducted this year:

June 12-14:  Bachmann 48, Graves 43
August 29-30:  Bachmann 48, Graves 46
October 3-4: Bachmann 47, Graves 45

The source concludes: the KSTP poll showing Bachmann up by nine points "appears to be nothing but an aberration."

Let's hope so. But here's something else you need to know about the KSTP/SurveyUSA polling:
(CONTINUED)

At the beginning of September, a SurveyUSA/KSTP poll reported that "an amendment to define marriage in Minnesota as between one man and one woman is today favored to pass 50% to 43%."

But in the same month, Public Policy Polling (PPP) found a virtual tie on the very same issue:

PPP's newest poll on the constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage in Minnesota finds it virtually tied, with 48% of voters supporting the ban to 47% who oppose it.
Which polling oufit was getting it right? The one that showed the "no gay marriage" lobby seven points ahead, or the one that showed a virtual tie on the issue?

Let's see. Later in September, the Minneapolis Star Tribune poll showed "support the amendment: 49%--against the amendment 47%."

A PPP poll conducted at the beginning of October and released on October 8 reported:
"support the amendment: 46% --against the amendment: 49%."

It seems clear that the SurveyUSA/KSTP poll was the outlier on the gay marriage amendment. So their result showing Bachmann with a comfortable lead over Graves may be an outlier, too.

And: the Minnesota Progressive Project's Dan Burns points out that DCCC has decided to get into this race this very week, to support the Graves campaign. Would they devote their considerable resources toward winning this race, at this moment--if their numbers showed that Bachmann was far ahead?

ACTION LINK: Fight the crazy and the lies and the bigotry, however you can. Donate to Jim Graves' effort to stop Bachmann:
https://secure.actblue.com/...

LINK: The SurveyUSA/KSTP poll. One interesting thing..."Bachmann's lead comes entirely from men"...she's losing women voters. Nine per cent undecided...
http://kstp.com/...

Next: Bachmann fundraising continues to astonish. From Brian Lambert at the MinnPost:

(So far this year) Bachmann's fundraising haul likely exceeds the combined amount raised by all of the major party candidates in the other eight U.S. Senate and House races in (Minnesota.) … While capable of raising enormous sums of money, Bachmann's fundraising apparatus is expensive to maintain. As MPR News reported last month, Bachmann's campaign has spent on average about 16 cents of every dollar raised on bringing in more cash.” You’d almost think fund-raising is why she’s in Congress.
There's evidence of that. Bachmann raised $4.5 millions dollars for this year's re-election bid in just three months. Despite this, she's still telling supporters that she desperately needs more money. From an email she sent out yesterday:
...your continued support has never been more important. The hyper-liberals at the DCCC are working day and night to defeat us, and we need to fight back. The fastest way to join our campaign is by making an online donation.

Won't you please give my campaign "a boost" by making a donation of $25, $50, $100 or more?

God bless,

-Michele

P.S. Fellow Conservative -- the DCCC is threatening to destroy the very values which you and I believe so strongly in. We will never be able to compete with their millions but with your donation we will be able to fight back and spread our conservative message across Minnesota. Please make your most generous contribution right away.

That's pretty shameless, telling people that you really need their $25 bucks when you're already sitting on more than $4.5 million and nearly twenty per cent of every dollar they've given you goes to more fundraising. But no one can doubt: the lie works.
http://www.minnpost.com/...

Next: We suspected Bachmann's wild charge was BS--and by God and as usual, it was:

Receiving the controversial HPV vaccine does not make young girls more likely to have sex, a new study says.

Human papillomavirus is the most common sexually transmitted disease in the U.S., and it can lead to several types of cancer. But there is political resistance to the HPV vaccine, in part because of fears that girls will become more promiscuous if they've been vaccinated...

...But fears of increased promiscuity are unfounded, according to a study published Monday in the journal Pediatrics...

Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum were playing "religious right/hate big government" politics with the lives of young girls. They excoriated GOP presidential candidate Rick Perry for mandating the vaccine in Texas. Perry responded that he was trying to do the right thing in order to prevent cancer in young women.

The appearance of this study in Pediatrics arrives to late to help Perry. But it's not too late to ask Bachmann if Perry did the right thing--if she still opposes a government cancer prevention program that doesn't encourage promiscuity.
http://thehill.com/...

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site