This is what David Gregory tweeted during the Foreign Policy debate:
Obviously David Gregory thinks he is strategy decoder extraordinaire.
According to him, sitting back and not engaging is a show of confidence - when Romney does it. When President Obama played that game, in the first debate - it was a Category 5 freakout.
The pundit consensus is that Romney's strategy of non-engagement is a sign of the momentum his campaign knows it has.
The pundits on the various channels are spinning this wildly, in Romney's favor. They all agree that Obama won soundly (except for the tool David Brooks) but in the same breath they then discount the importance of the debate, saying it won't matter because of the unimportance of foreign policy to voters.
What a disgusting group of tools and fools - they take polls, and then spend hours discrediting what real people think.