Skip to main content

The substandard reporting done by Jeremy Peters in Thursday's NY Times should be brought to the attention of their editors. This is one of the most poorly supported articles I have read this election cycle. Read on...

Being an outstanding journalist requires great time and effort. Writing a basic news article does not. Many of us took a journalism class in school- you have your five W’s when applicable, and after that you state facts. If you make an assertion, you support it with fact.

The New York Time’s Jeremy W. Peters is not new to journalism. He began working for the paper eleven years ago, and has done well enough to assume more responsibilities since then. But you never would have guessed this having read this piece from Thursday about the presidential race in Pennsylvania.

Peters begins with the familiar question about why Mitt Romney is now putting some resources into PA. Does he see an opportunity, or is it a head fake? Though every GOP candidate going back to Bush 41 has done this the last weekend of the race and still lost the state, I suppose it is a fair question to ask.

Peters continues to conclude that it’s the former- the race is tightening and a door is opening for Romney. I’d have no problem with this conclusion if he provided some tangible evidence- a steady stream of polling showing Romney making some gains perhaps.

But none of that is to be found. Instead, his concrete evidence for ‘Mittmentum’ in PA is given to us in paragraph twelve:

"But there is a tangible sense — seen in Romney yard signs on the expansive lawns of homes in the well-heeled suburbs, and heard in the excited voices of Republican mothers who make phone calls to voters in their spare time — that the race is tilting toward Mr. Romney."
The boldface is mine. I’ll give you a moment to process the absurdity of that statement. Peters’ evidence that the race is tightening is that he (possibly) has seen some Romney yard signs in some suburbs and (presumably) some ‘excited’ Republican mothers have called people in the state in support of Romney. Though being Peters lives in Manhattan, I can’t imagine he has received any of these calls himself. He also clearly needs to learn the difference between 'tangible' and 'intangible'.

I live in Florida. I see a dozen Obama yard signs on the way out of my neighborhood in the morning. At the local OFA office, excited women (and men) place calls all day long in support of Obama. I suppose we can therefore conclude the race in Florida is tilting toward Obama?

Folks, this goes beyond partisanship- in fairness, Peters has written articles that would bother conservatives. This is about laziness. While the standards at the NY Times seem to have dropped in the last decade, this may be the worst example of journalism I have read in their paper this election cycle. Please join me in letting the Times know that we expect better.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site